Look back into the archives of the 2.3 forum for some guy who posted "I agree" or "This is the right answer" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD. He was just trying to build up his post count, and he got pwnt by Crovax.
So I didnt see a definitive answer about the passenger side tail pipe. Looks like I can just move the brake line bracket over to the frame rail and run dumps with no problem, which is what I have for the car right now. But if she decides that she cant live with the dumps, will a full tail clear the brake line on that side without relocating it to the center of the housing?
Thats because your Mustang is newer than mine. My SVO came with dual fuel pumps...a low pressure and a high pressure. This was high tech before they went to one single pump in the tank. Anyways one of the fuel pumps mounts right on the body ( like the frame rail) where that second exhaust pipe would run. This isn't to bad to deal with since most people just swap in a a newer 255lp pump from a 5.0L. Once they do that, they by pass the old frame mounted pump.
But really I wouldn't run a dual exhaust anyways since to me it's a waste of money and added weight. Keep in mind this is only my opinion and may not be everyones elses. Now if I owned a 85.5 - 86 SVO I would since it already comes this way from the factory.
Thats because your Mustang is newer than mine. My SVO came with dual fuel pumps...a low pressure and a high pressure. This was high tech before they went to one single pump in the tank. Anyways one of the fuel pumps mounts right on the body ( like the frame rail) where that second exhaust pipe would run. This isn't to bad to deal with since most people just swap in a a newer 255lp pump from a 5.0L. Once they do that, they by pass the old frame mounted pump.
But really I wouldn't run a dual exhaust anyways since to me it's a waste of money and added weight. Keep in mind this is only my opinion and may not be everyones elses. Now if I owned a 85.5 - 86 SVO I would since it already comes this way from the factory.