• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Grocery Getter cam recommendation

  • Thread starter Thread starter limp
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2021
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
Apr 30, 2021
#21
  • Apr 30, 2021
  • #21
The summit carb is based off the the old Autolite 4100 line.... A very dependable set it and forget it carb, by what I have read.. Who is making it for Summit? I can only assume.......
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#22
  • May 1, 2021
  • #22
MustangIIMatt said:
In the 600cfm range, I've had Holley, Summit, and Edelbrock carburetors, and for my money, the Edelbrock 1406 (electric choke 600cfm) is the clear winner for a street 302 with mild mods.

The basic differences are as such:

The Edelbrock is 99% a "set it and forget it" solution, and is as close as you'll get to 100% without converting to EFI. It forgives novice carb tuners, has excellent street manners and drivability right out of the box when sized right. It's only drawback is that fuel will evaporate right out of the bowls if the car isn't driven frequently, something the other two are less prone to.

Holley is for the tinkerer or the one who wants maximum performance. Imminently tuneable and adjustable with a plethora of parts to make it do whatever you want, the Holley can do things the Edelbrock simply won't do with an experienced wrench-turner working on it. The biggest downside to the Holley is that they're far more sensitive to atmospheric changes, and you will find yourself making adjustments at least twice a year.

Summit's carburetor is a cheap and decent solution, but I wasn't crazy about it. Setting it up is easy enough, but it required partial disassembly of the carburetor to do so, something a Holley or Edelbrock won't require unless you make a jet change. The one I bought had some quality issues as well, and I ended up making a trip to the parts store for brass fittings to replace the leaky parts included with the carb. While it was easy to tune and ran well, I kept thinking "I should've spent the extra few dollars on an Edelbrock" the whole time.
Click to expand...
Appreciate the advise and experience...
This is the one I was thinking of mostly due to the 500 cfm rating and a copy of the 4100 series..

 
Last edited: May 1, 2021

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#23
  • May 1, 2021
  • #23
MustangIIMatt said:
500cfm will run a 302 very nicely all day with snappy throttle response and good fuel economy, but 600cfm is usually the "happy place" for a mildly modded 302. If overall performance at the top end of the rpm range isn't a concern, the 500 will probably make you happy.

The formula has always suggested 450-550 cfm for any 5.0L engine I've run, but the old hot rodder's wisdom of multiplying the CID by 2 for your ideal CFM has worked better for me. That said, I've also ignored both and run a smaller carburetor when that's all I've had or was after better fuel economy. (I've even run a Rochester 2G on a big block when gas was $4/gallon).

The Summit carb is a copy of a copy, or to be more accurate, an adaptation of an adaptation. It's based on the Holley 4010 which was based on the Autolite 4100.

The Summit works well enough, and if you're going for something that looks like it belongs on a Ford it's the automatic winner over the generic-looking Holley 4160 family or the Mopar-like Edelbrock.
Click to expand...
For what looks right on a Ford -
Holley’s have been on Fords since 1903 and on other brand factory muscle cars. Autolite and Holley carbs often shares basic designs. (Like the 4100/4010 example.)
The Edelbrock is an improved AFB.
I am not sure it matters a lot what’s under a low profile air breather from a visual point as you cannot see much anyway.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#24
  • May 1, 2021
  • #24
MustangIIMatt said:
This is true, but the street carbs Holley sells these days visually look kind of generic.

It could be because I've seen that design on virtually everything out there.
Click to expand...
Agreed. I also think it’s interesting Holley now owns Demon and QFT that were updating their designs.
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#25
  • May 1, 2021
  • #25
I haven't purchased anything yet so you never know, I might buy the 600......

Now what about cams?? LOL
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 1, 2021
#26
  • May 1, 2021
  • #26
Unless you go custom, run the stock HO cam. For a grocery getter light to light it can't be beat. Save some money and think about a set of used twisted wedge heads. Not sure it gets much better than that for a grocery getter combo.
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#27
  • May 1, 2021
  • #27
MustangIIMatt said:
It's a roller block, so I'd honestly recommend an E cam or B cam. It's gonna sound great, play nice with the carb, give you a modest bump in power, and combined with the carb will have an old-school sound and vibe.
Click to expand...
When I have looked at these seems they don't come on till after 3000 rpm.....
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#28
  • May 1, 2021
  • #28
deathb4dismount said:
Unless you go custom, run the stock HO cam. For a grocery getter light to light it can't be beat. Save some money and think about a set of used twisted wedge heads. Not sure it gets much better than that for a grocery getter combo.
Click to expand...
I am going to use the GT40 P heads that came on the engine I bought, unless they are in bad shape... Haven't got to them yet..
HO cam, any links to one of these?
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#29
  • May 1, 2021
  • #29
7991LXnSHO said:
Agreed. I also think it’s interesting Holley now owns Demon and QFT that were updating their designs.
Click to expand...
The big sometimes keep getting bigger and we lose some of the small guys we like....
 

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 1, 2021
#30
  • May 1, 2021
  • #30
limp said:
I am going to use the GT40 P heads that came on the engine I bought, unless they are in bad shape... Haven't got to them yet..
HO cam, any links to one of these?
Click to expand...

limp said:
I am going to use the GT40 P heads that came on the engine I bought, unless they are in bad shape... Haven't got to them yet..
HO cam, any links to one of these?
Click to expand...

I don't think you can get a new one, but someone on the forums will probably give one away. Save $ there, save $ on springs, sell the gt40 P heads, your getting close to used tfs 170s. Just a thought.
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#31
  • May 1, 2021
  • #31
I was on the LMR website looking at the Alphabet cams and the Comp cams...
The "E" cam comes on at 2500 RPM, while two of the comp cams come in at 1500... I want to think the comp cams are more to what I want.. Of course the comp cams are out of stock until June.....
Anyone with any experience with these cams??
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#32
  • May 1, 2021
  • #32
MustangIIMatt said:
It's a roller block, so I'd honestly recommend an E cam or B cam. It's gonna sound great, play nice with the carb, give you a modest bump in power, and combined with the carb will have an old-school sound and vibe.
Click to expand...
I am starting to like this idea more....
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#33
  • May 1, 2021
  • #33
Match the cam’s power band to the power band of the intake.

if you are not taking it the heads to a machine shop with lift specs in hand for the cam, before you get springs I hope you like coil bind or valve float. I’ve been trying to save you money, but I’m tagging out since you do not really want sound advice.
Maybe you’ll get lucky with a parts number guess, maybe parts will hit and it will get exciting.
(@CarMichael Angelo)
 
Last edited: May 1, 2021

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#34
  • May 1, 2021
  • #34
7991LXnSHO said:
Match the cam’s power band to the power band of the intake.

if you are not taking it the heads to a machine shop with lift specs in hand for the cam, before you get springs I hope you like coil bind or valve float. I’ve been trying to save you money, but I’m tagging out since you do not really want sound advice.
Maybe you’ll get lucky with a parts number guess, maybe parts will hit and it will get exciting.
(@CarMichael Angelo)
Click to expand...
I am looking for a cam so I can start to assemble my short block.. Can we talk about the heads at a later date?? I appreciate everybody's comments here, but if you want to go pee in your cheerios, that is your choice.....
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#35
  • May 1, 2021
  • #35
MustangIIMatt said:
The E cam was everyone's go-to cam in the late 90s and early 00s to make a mostly stock 5.0 fox sound amazing, bump the power up enough to feel it, and not screw up fuel economy or drivability. We're talking pure bolt-in cars that were usually even running the stock intake. Take a listen here:

View: https://youtu.be/cNWv5WpamPc


Even though technology passed the alphabet cams by in performance over the years, they are still a great value with a distinct sound for a street car where all out performance isn't the goal and drivability is important.
Click to expand...

Is this what a B or E cam sounds/idles like? While I plan on having quiet mufflers, I am not sure I want my car to have that much "lopeyness"...
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#36
  • May 1, 2021
  • #36
limp said:
Is this what a B or E cam sounds/idles like? While I plan on having quiet mufflers, I am not sure I want my car to have that much "lopeyness"...
Click to expand...
It sent me a notice even though I unsubscribed. Please listen.
Yes, these fun letter cams have a noticeable idle. The 268H does, too. The EX series should. That’s why Comp recommended a bit smaller model from your description. And no, you should not consider the heads later. The heads, rockers, springs, lifters, pistons and pushrods are all part of what cam you can run. It’s a package deal, even when bought separately.
 

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#37
  • May 1, 2021
  • #37
And I don’t care for Cheerios any more than broken new engines.
 
Reactions: limp

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
May 1, 2021
#38
  • May 1, 2021
  • #38
Matt, I am concerned that he’s going to need different springs with even a stock 5.0 cam than are on the GT-40P heads. He best be checking about coil bind and valve float with anything more.
I have built the engine he describes, but with E-7 heads. It will be fun and not obnoxious with the right combo.
Les
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#39
  • May 1, 2021
  • #39
MustangIIMatt said:
You're not wrong, but I think you're overthinking this if I'm understanding Limo's wants and needs from this engine (and I may not be).
Click to expand...

MustangIIMatt said:
You're not wrong, but I think you're overthinking this if I'm understanding Limo's wants and needs from this engine (and I may not be).
Click to expand...
I think I might have started it with my custom cam suggestion, but no, this IS getting overthought... If I put the stock Explorer cam back in it I would probably be happy.. Sounds like the isky might be closer to what I want, I will check it out.
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 1, 2021
#40
  • May 1, 2021
  • #40
7991LXnSHO said:
Matt, I am concerned that he’s going to need different springs with even a stock 5.0 cam than are on the GT-40P heads. He best be checking about coil bind and valve float with anything more.
I have built the engine he describes, but with E-7 heads. It will be fun and not obnoxious with the right combo.
Les
Click to expand...
I am looking at the beehive springs from Alex's parts, new pushrods, and the Lunati roller tip rockers... I have not purchased these items yet, before having the heads checked out by the machine shop.. right now I am getting my short block paid for ...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
784
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
788
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?