• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Grocery Getter cam recommendation

  • Thread starter Thread starter limp
  • Start date Start date Apr 30, 2021
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 3, 2021
#41
  • May 3, 2021
  • #41
limp said:
I think I might have started it with my custom cam suggestion, but no, this IS getting overthought... If I put the stock Explorer cam back in it I would probably be happy.. Sounds like the isky might be closer to what I want, I will check it out.
Click to expand...

You will surely not be happy with a stock explorer cam. That thing will be a turd.
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
May 3, 2021
#42
  • May 3, 2021
  • #42
Explorer cam is for more low end torque to get a truck moving, but it will run out of steam at higher RPM.

I'd rather run an stock HO cam (85-88 preferable although difference from 89-95 cams is only slight) with 1.7RR"s than the exploder cam. There's a good thread on corral about use of a stock HO cam and how far people are taking it. It's actually a pretty decent grind for what it is, but it just lacks the chop chop that people want.

But i understand not many people want to build a engine and then toss a stock HO cam in it. I didn't even take my advice and went with a fancy pants custom grind that required fancy springs just so i can cruise down to the local ice cream place. I get it. It's fun to have a bit of an aggressive cam as compared to the HO cam.

You've gotten a lot of good advice. It's your call at this point.
 
Last edited: May 3, 2021

deathb4dismount

Crap, didn’t realize my crotch was in that picture
15 Year Member
Oct 6, 2011
1,031
502
164
THE BUCKET
May 4, 2021
#43
  • May 4, 2021
  • #43
Mustang5L5 said:
Explorer cam is for more low end torque to get a truck moving, but it will run out of steam at higher RPM.

I'd rather run an stock HO cam (85-88 preferable although difference from 89-95 cams is only slight) with 1.7RR"s than the exploder cam. There's a good thread on corral about use of a stock HO cam and how far people are taking it. It's actually a pretty decent grind for what it is, but it just lacks the chop chop that people want.

But i understand not many people want to build a engine and then toss a stock HO cam in it. I didn't even take my advice and went with a fancy pants custom grind that required fancy springs just so i can cruise down to the local ice cream place. I get it. It's fun to have a bit of an aggressive cam as compared to the HO cam.

You've gotten a lot of good advice. It's your call at this point.
Click to expand...

Love that thread. @limp you need to be thinking about the sum of all parts, and the style of driving you'll be doing. For a grocery getter it doesn't make any sense to throw a cam in that doesn't make power till around 4k RPMS, but will make power past 6k RPMS when your heads will be choking out 5500. Even a mild OTS cam like the TFS stage 1 will compromise on low end. Sure I can spin it 6200 RPM, but then that's obnoxious on the street, and the soccer mom in the ecoboost Ford Flex that walked me off the red light already pulled into starbucks.
 
Reactions: Mustang5L5

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
May 4, 2021
#44
  • May 4, 2021
  • #44
Here's the stock cam thread on corral. Some impressive achievements in there.

Who is committed to running a stock roller cam?

Please post up your stock cammed combo and why you are sticking with a stock cam. Don't wanna here that stock cams suck, etc. Wanna know what people are doing while retaining a stock cam. Thank you everyone. UPDATED 10/9/2018 Why: I'm staying stock cam. Mine is an 85GT that has been upgraded...
www.corral.net
 

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 4, 2021
#45
  • May 4, 2021
  • #45
deathb4dismount said:
Love that thread. @limp you need to be thinking about the sum of all parts, and the style of driving you'll be doing. For a grocery getter it doesn't make any sense to throw a cam in that doesn't make power till around 4k RPMS, but will make power past 6k RPMS when your heads will be choking out 5500. Even a mild OTS cam like the TFS stage 1 will compromise on low end. Sure I can spin it 6200 RPM, but then that's obnoxious on the street, and the soccer mom in the ecoboost Ford Flex that walked me off the red light already pulled into starbucks.
Click to expand...
I am glad that comment I made got some people a little more into my "help wanted" section on cams....
Funny, I looked at a Edelbrock "Rollin Thunder" cam... idle to 5500 power curve.... SAME exact specs as a E303, which states 2200-5500?? Not an engineer here but that one has me laughing....
I can get a custom for $400, and most of the roller cams are at $350... Pretty sure I am going to order a custom...
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
May 4, 2021
#46
  • May 4, 2021
  • #46
limp said:
I can get a custom for $400, and most of the roller cams are at $350... Pretty sure I am going to order a custom...
Click to expand...

The "watch out" with the custom cam is springs. It's one thing if you were planning to change the springs on your heads anyway, but if you werent, you may find out you need to to match the cam. Something you will want to find out up front.


My Custom cam cost me $800 when i factored in ditching the equipped springs on my brand new TFS170's to install the recommended springs to match the custom grind.
 
Reactions: Adieu

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 4, 2021
#47
  • May 4, 2021
  • #47
Mustang5L5 said:
The "watch out" with the custom cam is springs. It's one thing if you were planning to change the springs on your heads anyway, but if you werent, you may find out you need to to match the cam. Something you will want to find out up front.


My Custom cam cost me $800 when i factored in ditching the equipped springs on my brand new TFS170's to install the recommended springs to match the custom grind.
Click to expand...
From what I have read gt40P heads have the weakest springs on ANY head ever.... New springs are a give me if I use these heads, which I plan to unless they become too costly and move me to Aluminum heads... Lets not go there yet... And as you said I need to match springs to the cam.....

I have been taught, and have always done it this way, that the cam is the first thing installed in a rebuild.. My block is coming home soon and I want to order a cam so I can assemble the short block...
 
Last edited: May 4, 2021

limp

wrap a little cheese around it and its a done
5 Year Member
Oct 4, 2020
5,466
2,899
173
Florida
May 4, 2021
#48
  • May 4, 2021
  • #48

Competition Products - Performance Engine Parts, Racing Engine Parts and Accessories

www.competitionproducts.com

This cam popped up on a search for "302 HO cam" Anyone familiar with Elgin cams?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
796
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Specific Cam Questions that Google can't seem to answer...
  • ChillPhatCat
  • Jun 20, 2024
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
3
Views
790
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Jun 22, 2024
ChillPhatCat
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
302 Engine build questions
  • Vulpes5.0
  • Apr 19, 2022
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2022
LEEDAY Boss
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?