• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

gt40 intake on a stock engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emeraldcoupe
  • Start date Start date Sep 25, 2005
E

emeraldcoupe

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2000
269
1
18
florida
Sep 25, 2005
#1
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #1
i picked up a gt40 ( tubular)intake for a rediculous price ( $100 upper and lower). the only thing done to the engine right now is a full exhaust. is it worth the time to put the intake on now, or should i wait until i do the cam?
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Sep 25, 2005
#2
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #2
wait until you do the HEADS!!!!!!!!!
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
Sep 25, 2005
#3
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #3
Putting it on a stock/relatively stock engine will result in an overall increase in HP/TQ, but you'll lose a LOT down low. Paul Perreca is right, wait until you have heads to match the flow, and you'll see the benefits of it.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Sep 25, 2005
#4
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #4
put it on, upgrade the tb and egr as well as mass air meter, then it will make a nice difference.
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Sep 25, 2005
#5
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #5
put it on. i dont have any numbers to back it up but i noticed gains and its not hard to put on. keep the stock tb until you get heads.
 

notchback

Founding Member
May 30, 2000
1,950
0
36
St Clair Shores MI
Sep 25, 2005
#6
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #6
it will gain nothing...but look great.

i'd do it.....

i did it b4...and ran EXACTLY the same at the track on all stock motor
 

Daniel50

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
716
1
0
Discovery Bay, CA
Sep 25, 2005
#7
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #7
yeah gains arnt to great without heads/cam. i threw a cobra intake on and felt no big difference. get crazy sideways in the 1-2 shift at redline but im not saying thats the reason why. i blew a head gasket last week due to nitrous and only 91 octane with advanced timing. so its a sign to get heads now
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Sep 26, 2005
#8
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #8
If you have the stock headers, then you may not see much difference. Either way, it will move your HP/TQ curve more towards the high-rpm range. You'll loose some low-end. IMHO, in a 5.0, many people wouldn't notice it.

Since I don't have a track-only car, I love the low-end grunt for my 5.0! So, I like more of a "well rounded" intake like the Explorer. But, some people want the most high-end HP (or dyno numbers) they can get. So, each to his own.



notchback said:
it will gain nothing...but look great.
i'd do it.....
Click to expand...
Yup, if I still had my stock intake, I also do the swap!
 
B

blackice

New Member
Sep 23, 2005
17
0
0
CT
Sep 26, 2005
#9
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #9
Personally i wouldnt do an intake , money can be spent in better areas as said in above responses. If i had an AOD i would do a torque converter , if I had a Stick I would doe gears..
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 26, 2005
#10
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #10
You'll loose some low end and gain some upper end power. Average power over the usable rpm band should be about the same. Put it on if you like it - you got one killer price on the intake.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Sep 26, 2005
#11
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #11
I did the 70mm TB an gt-40 intake at the same time. while it felt a little weaker down low it more than made up for it from 2500 rpms and up. Since you got a killer deal on the intake, and even if it doesnt pick up alot it will still look a whole lot better on your motor than a shelf.
 

aleborjas

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
610
0
0
Sep 26, 2005
#12
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #12
blackstangt said:
put it on, upgrade the tb and egr as well as mass air meter, then it will make a nice difference.
Click to expand...
in order to have more air you need more fuel so i recomend you with the intake a larger maff and some 24's...

Blackstangt how does the intake work and what rwhp does your car has?
 
I

IntenseBlue

Member
Jul 10, 2005
946
0
16
Sep 26, 2005
#13
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #13
He won't need 24s.
 

ninety15.0

New Member
Mar 10, 2004
1,336
0
0
Sep 26, 2005
#14
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #14
24's are uneccessary for his application. i would toss it on there for sure. you said you had full exhaust....so adding an open intake will most deifnately give you a noticable improvement. maybe not huge but noticable.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 26, 2005
#15
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #15
I agree, the 19#s will take him much farther than that....
 
1

1991_5.0_vert

New Member
Sep 5, 2005
22
0
0
Deer Trail, Colorado
Sep 26, 2005
#16
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #16
I'm going to agree with going ahead and putting it on there, it's a performance gain no matter how you look at it.
 
E

emeraldcoupe

Founding Member
Jul 1, 2000
269
1
18
florida
Sep 26, 2005
#17
  • Sep 26, 2005
  • #17
blackice said:
Personally i wouldnt do an intake , money can be spent in better areas as said in above responses. If i had an AOD i would do a torque converter , if I had a Stick I would doe gears..
Click to expand...

it's a 5 speed car and i have 3.27's in the rear and a full exhaust(headers to tails). i don't know, i think the $100 was well spent. i could always put it on ebay and triple my money. i'll probably use it, i love how it looks. plus i want to supercharge the car (way) in the future
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Oct 3, 2005
#18
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #18
aleborjas said:
in order to have more air you need more fuel so i recomend you with the intake a larger maff and some 24's...

Blackstangt how does the intake work and what rwhp does your car has?
Click to expand...

dont quote me... no, 24's aren't necessary, and an intake is used to divert the airflow going into the engine... never dynoed, but I'm going to do a chip when i do, so when that's in my mods, i can say.
 

blackstangt

Member
May 31, 2004
460
1
19
ny
Oct 3, 2005
#19
  • Oct 3, 2005
  • #19
oh and the typhoon intake works well, but has no oil shield in the lower and the thermostat hump is not ground down, so it gets in the way of timing which is a pita.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
330
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine Cleaning Intake valves with lower intake off
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
13
Views
390
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 11, 2026
limp
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
321
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
749
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
675
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?