• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Gt40p Roller Rocker Choice

  • Thread starter Thread starter sen2two
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2014

sen2two

I've been lubing and pulling it all morning
5 Year Member
Jul 18, 2013
396
58
59
Jul 7, 2014
#1
  • Jul 7, 2014
  • #1
So I'm setting up my gt40p heads and I am deciding between 1.6 and 1.7 roller rockers.

I have an e303 cam which has a .498" lift. With the 1.7 rr's, lift will increase to .529". I also have the gt40 upper and lower intake with 65mm TB as well as 1 3/4" MAC Long tubes. I am also porting the heads as well as my upper and lower intake. I do not plan on shifting past 6000 rpm in fear of splitting my block.

Will my set up breath enough to make the 1.7 rr's worth the cost?

Ps. I am coming from the rotary engine world so I am still learning cam tech. Where does lift actually benefit the rpm band? Or is it better everywhere since it let's more air in?
 

sen2two

I've been lubing and pulling it all morning
5 Year Member
Jul 18, 2013
396
58
59
Jul 8, 2014
#2
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #2
Also, the car does have nitrous on it. I only spray a 65 shot at the moment. But I plan to at least double that.

Basically, I am wagering the cost of roller rockers vs. the cost of milling the heads and trying to figure out where my money is better spent.

The bottom end is a completely stock 91 302.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jul 8, 2014
#3
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #3
1.6 rockers get my vote. You may run into ptv issues with the 1.7 rockers. Either way it is your best interest to check
 

sen2two

I've been lubing and pulling it all morning
5 Year Member
Jul 18, 2013
396
58
59
Jul 8, 2014
#4
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #4
Can you elaborate on why you would vote for the 1.6 rockers?

I plan on checking my PTV clearance when I do the swap. But after a lot of searching, there are quite a few people already using this set up with success.

Success referring to it working. Not referring to it being the best choice for the best results. Which is what I would like to find out.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Jul 8, 2014
#5
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #5
I vote 1.6RR's too. If you bought the car that way, or got the combo super cheap, then go ahead and get the 1.7's

But generally, its a better practice to control lift with camshaft selection, not rocker selection.

Why on earth did yo go with the 1 3/4" Long tubes? Did you get a deal on them or something? Waaaay more header than you'll ever use with a set of GT40's.

I wouldn't worry about splitting your block. You aren't making anywhere close to enough power to do that. Even if you were to take it past that, the stock ECU shuts the party down at 6,250RPM anyway......not that it matters since that camshaft start running out of steam in a hurry right around 5,500RPM.
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jul 8, 2014
#6
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #6
Exactly as Brian said, I believe that your camshaft profile should dictate your overall lift, not the rockers. While it is a common occurrence to see others bolt on 1.7 rockers it is usually due to that person not changing the camshaft at that same time. If you are changing the camshaft then I vote for picking an appropriate one and staying with the 1.6 ratio
 
Reactions: 2000xp8

sen2two

I've been lubing and pulling it all morning
5 Year Member
Jul 18, 2013
396
58
59
Jul 8, 2014
#7
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #7
The E cam was installed prior to me buying the car.

The 1 3/4 headers were to good of a deal to pass up. Plus I know they fit the P heads without any modifications at all.

So besides it being a better practice to let the cam dictate lift, is there a reason why 1.6 is better than 1.7 ratio in this scenario?

I'm still confused as to why less lift with the 1.6 rockers would be better here (assuming it is)... Will it create turbulence? Reduce intake velocity? Lose power at the top or bottom end without benefiting the other end?
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Jul 8, 2014
#8
  • Jul 8, 2014
  • #8
Your cylinder heads only flow so much air. That being said, more valve lift isn't always the answer. Your combination all has to work together if you expect it to perform well. Adding more lift to the cam in this situation will likely not yield any more power thus the recommendation to stick with a 1.6 rocker. Ideally if you are looking for more power then look into a set of TFS or AFR cylinder heads. I personally wouldn't invest a lot of money into the gt40 heads
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Oil burning on my recently buil 302
  • The blk67
  • May 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
140
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2026
Noobz347
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
787
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
349
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
Engine Roller Rocker Stud Size, GT40P heads
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
2000xp8
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
703
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?