• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Halp With Engine Selection For Muh Notch!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr. Rustypwnz
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Dec 16, 2013
#1
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #1
Ok, so I would like to do a cool engine swap into the fox. I already build a ton of modulars. Those are getting old. So I was thinking, go extreme with a SBF. This time do it right, how Ive always wanted to build one. Last one I built made around 340-345rwhp, with a 306. That was a very simple engine nothing custom or crazy. So I would like for this one to do around 400 or so.

Specs:
4.125 bore
289 crank (2.85" stroke I think?)
Dome pistons (13.1)
High ports
vic jr intake.
custom cam
Make it live at 7500+

Sound do-able?
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,762
6,927
214
SW Houston
Dec 16, 2013
#2
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #2
sounds like fun. I brought up de-stroking once and it got shot down. But don't you need light weight valves and some serious valve springs for a high winding motor?
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 16, 2013
#3
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #3
id ditch the high ports and go with the 11R head
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Dec 16, 2013
#4
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #4
I don't see the sense in de stroking the motor. at 4.125 bore I'm guessing you'll be using an aftermarket block? 7,500 in a aftermarket block is child's play. my 438 lived at 8400 and never faulted on the dyno
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 16, 2013
#5
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #5
84Ttop said:
I don't see the sense in de stroking the motor. at 4.125 bore I'm guessing you'll be using an aftermarket block? 7,500 in a aftermarket block is child's play. my 438 lived at 8400 and never faulted on the dyno
Click to expand...

yea that RPM is nothing... the 450" nitrous motor has been to 9500 and so has the little 347 turbo motor
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 16, 2013
#6
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #6
I personally never saw the value of 9000rpm destroked engines. Maybe circle track/certain drag applications but anything that sees any street time...bleh. My buddy ran a 301 Chevy that turned 8000 rpm with a 4speed/4.56 gear. It ran low 12s with slicks and was a dog below 5000rpm. Maybe with forced induction but not n/a. You'll need to gear the sh it out of it. I'd go with at least a 3.25" stroke(big bore 347)
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Dec 16, 2013
#7
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #7
srtthis said:
id ditch the high ports and go with the 11R head
Click to expand...

Never heard of this head. Specs?
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
Dec 16, 2013
#8
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #8
84Ttop said:
I don't see the sense in de stroking the motor. at 4.125 bore I'm guessing you'll be using an aftermarket block? 7,500 in a aftermarket block is child's play. my 438 lived at 8400 and never faulted on the dyno
Click to expand...

Yeah, aftermarket. I would like to do 8000rpm. But that would be the most I would go. 8500+ would prolly be way out of my league
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 16, 2013
#9
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #9
Man you cray cray. Forget de-stroking anything. It would be like Peyton Manning playing with an eye patch on. It’s still the same old Peyton, only he’s screwing up his depth perception for no other reason than to just look like a pirate.


Do a 347/363 with one of those new fancy ITB intakes and Comp’s new high-rev hydraulic roller lifters. Then cut a hole in the hood so everybody can see the beautiful induction!
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 16, 2013
#10
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #10
Rolls Royce Merlin
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 16, 2013
#11
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #11
408 windsor gets my vote
 
Reactions: A5literMan

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 16, 2013
#12
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #12
View attachment 182148
 
Reactions: 88LX5.Oh

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,762
6,927
214
SW Houston
Dec 16, 2013
#13
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #13
It'd be different. I wanna see it done, just like when everyone told @NIKwoaC he was crazy for putting monster heads on a little 302.

Those are the cars I love to see in the Super Stock class at the NHRA races. Massive wheelies and the motor is screaming the whole way. I dig it.
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,762
6,927
214
SW Houston
Dec 16, 2013
#14
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #14
stykthyn said:
View attachment 182147
Click to expand...

Who makes that?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 16, 2013
#15
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #15
hoopty5.0 said:
Who makes that?
Click to expand...
http://www.borlainduction.com/ThrottleBody/351w_cross_ram_fr.html
 

srtthis

the guy doing it does every local racers rear end
15 Year Member
Jul 3, 2009
5,129
1,666
204
Maryland
Dec 16, 2013
#16
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #16
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
Never heard of this head. Specs?
Click to expand...
New trick flow heads 11° valve angle
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 16, 2013
#17
  • Dec 16, 2013
  • #17
Mr. Rustypwnz said:
Never heard of this head. Specs?
Click to expand...
New TFS race ported 205cc heads with 2.08x1.60valves,PAC .650 lift springs,titanium locks and retainers,etc. very nice head
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Dec 17, 2013
#18
  • Dec 17, 2013
  • #18
hoopty5.0 said:
It'd be different. I wanna see it done, just like when everyone told @NIKwoaC he was crazy for putting monster heads on a little 302.

Those are the cars I love to see in the Super Stock class at the NHRA races. Massive wheelies and the motor is screaming the whole way. I dig it.
Click to expand...

Yea but the difference is, I didn't build anything bigger because the stock bottom end was all that my budget allowed... I did not spend money to intentionally go smaller. I'm certainly not one to knock anybody who wants to be a little different, though, and @Mr. Rustypwnz is a fellow big head/small engine connoisseur, so I know whatever he builds, it should be entertaining.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Dec 17, 2013
#19
  • Dec 17, 2013
  • #19
Monster turbo esllinger headed svo engine.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Dec 18, 2013
#20
  • Dec 18, 2013
  • #20
I think the bottom of the engine is a " so what?" regardless of what you do. A 327;331;347;363 looks like a 302 anyway.

A high revving " A/MP type destroked engine revved past 8000 RPM just breaks sh it more catsclysmically than one that failed at 6000, all while failing to make any power below 4500 RPM.

What makes an engine " different " visually is how you feed it. But how you feed it is the key. It's nothing now a days to see rows of centrifugal S/C 5.0's all lined up at a show,..so nothing special there. Most turbo'd combinations have the turbo located somewhere beneath all of the I/C piping, so again,......yawn.

if I was gonna do something different in an engine build, I'd either inject it using multiple throttle bodies, or some other form of exoctic looking induction

or I'd turbocharge an inline six cylinder.

But then again, that's just me.
 
Last edited: Dec 18, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
469
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
712
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?