• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Head gasket port matching plus head/intake port alignment

  • Thread starter Thread starter PonyGTrider
  • Start date Start date Dec 10, 2024

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Dec 10, 2024
#1
  • Dec 10, 2024
  • #1
Hi all,
On my 306 I have a pair of 170 TFS twisted wedge and matching lower intake.
I’m just curious if anyone tried to head/port matching and at the same time head/intake port alignment, trying to use Felpro 1262 gasket. Right now I’m using Felpro 1250.
Will head/intake alignment make any difference in air flowing without any bumps in their path or will it be irrelevant?
If anyone have done that how did you mirror transferred the head port onto the intake?

Thank you
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 11, 2024
#2
  • Dec 11, 2024
  • #2
Use a sacrificial gasket to [scribe] the pattern onto the head and intake surface then blend them smooth. You don't have to go far into the port [at all]. Go in just enough to make the ramp. Use a micrometer to keep them uniform. Scribe your intended port transition depth before you start smoothing.

Less is more and all that jazz...
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Dec 11, 2024
#3
  • Dec 11, 2024
  • #3
Noobz347 said:
Use a sacrificial gasket to [scribe] the pattern onto the head and intake surface then blend them smooth. You don't have to go far into the port [at all]. Go in just enough to make the ramp. Use a micrometer to keep them uniform. Scribe your intended port transition depth before you start smoothing.

Less is more and all that jazz...
Click to expand...
I already did that using the 1250 gaskets, is it good or bad to use the 1262??? By the way I tried to use the regular gaskets and I hate them because somehow and for some reason they disintegrate al the water ports. To avoid that I use the 1250 S3 and love them. And if I decide to go a bit bigger then I will use the 1262 S3 gasket port match and align the intake runners for a smooth transition, or at least that’s the plan

Thanks man
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,076
21,264
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 11, 2024
#4
  • Dec 11, 2024
  • #4
Port match with the same part number gasket that you intend to use. Easier to eliminate errors that way. No idea what the actual difference are between gasket ports without measuring them.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Dec 12, 2024
#5
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #5
Noobz347 said:
Port match with the same part number gasket that you intend to use. Easier to eliminate errors that way. No idea what the actual difference are between gasket ports without measuring them.
Click to expand...
That’s my intention, I don’t know if there should be a problem to open the ports by going to the Felpro 1262 S3…
Here are the two gaskets ports dimensions as reference:

Thank you

Felpro 1250 S3
Port Height (in.): 2.000
Port Width (in.): 1.200

Felpro 1262 S3
Port Height (in.): 2.100
Port Width (in.): 1.280
 

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,880
4,005
183
Claremore, OK
Dec 12, 2024
#6
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #6
My Edelbrock Performer RPM heads and Performer RPM II lower are opened up to the 1262 with zero issues. Not TFS gear but I would not hesitate to open them up to that gasket.
 
Reactions: PonyGTrider

PonyGTrider

5 Year Member
Feb 27, 2019
625
110
63
Mexico
Dec 12, 2024
#7
  • Dec 12, 2024
  • #7
AeroCoupe said:
My Edelbrock Performer RPM heads and Performer RPM II lower are opened up to the 1262 with zero issues. Not TFS gear but I would not hesitate to open them up to that gasket.
Click to expand...
That’s my plan unless there are some issues which I just don’t think there are. Doing that and a good bowls and runners cleaning (As they’re “fast as cast”) should have good results in performance nothing crazy but good enough
Thank you
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Forged flat top pistons from 5.0 fit a 351 build?
  • PonyGTrider
  • May 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 1, 2026
PonyGTrider
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
876
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
Resolved Got Too Hot!!!
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
590
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
PonyGTrider
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?