• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Header & 351w are not even close

  • Thread starter Thread starter frost0100
  • Start date Start date Jul 23, 2007
F

frost0100

Member
Jul 10, 2003
127
0
17
Wilmington, NC
Jul 23, 2007
#1
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #1
Just got my engine put in - you can see the thread here.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=711901

I have two sets of headers that I got on the cheap. The first set I got was some crappy 351w swap headers from ford. The second set was a much better pair from BBK - both headers were the shorty headers.

Neither of these even came close to fitting. I have a 68 mustang. I could get about 4 fingers on each side between the engine and the shock tower.

I thought a 351w shortie header should of fit no problem.

Just looking for some insight.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Jul 23, 2007
#2
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #2
frost0100 said:
Just got my engine put in - you can see the thread here.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=711901

I have two sets of headers that I got on the cheap. The first set I got was some crappy 351w swap headers from ford. The second set was a much better pair from BBK - both headers were the shorty headers.

Neither of these even came close to fitting. I have a 68 mustang. I could get about 4 fingers on each side between the engine and the shock tower.

I thought a 351w shortie header should of fit no problem.

Just looking for some insight.
Click to expand...

Cheap Heddman swap long tubes work pretty well for me in the ultra-tight 66. Hope it works with my t5 swap... we'll see. But htey've been solid for me for years.

If you need, you can get them shiny coated for 270, or jsut the matte finish for 130. They're prone to minor leaks, so you have to keep em tightened periodically. But they're a lot cheaper than Hookers or others, and they definitely fit...
 

geostang351

Member
Mar 30, 2005
946
0
17
Danb., CT
Jul 23, 2007
#3
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #3
frost0100 said:
Just got my engine put in - you can see the thread here.

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=711901

I have two sets of headers that I got on the cheap. The first set I got was some crappy 351w swap headers from ford. The second set was a much better pair from BBK - both headers were the shorty headers.

Neither of these even came close to fitting. I have a 68 mustang. I could get about 4 fingers on each side between the engine and the shock tower.

I thought a 351w shortie header should of fit no problem.

Just looking for some insight.
Click to expand...

What do you mean they don't fit? Did you try putting them on the engine before it went in the car to see if the mounting holes lined up or do you mean you can't even install it in the car because of clearances? If it's the latter, you'll need to bring them up to the motor from underneath.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jul 23, 2007
#4
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #4
first the shock towers need to be spread apart as they are too close together. get an export brace for your car and install it. second, you have the wrong headers for your car. the 351w swap headers turn down much sooner than the headers you have on the car now. those look like fox body swap headers.
 
F

frost0100

Member
Jul 10, 2003
127
0
17
Wilmington, NC
Jul 23, 2007
#5
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #5
Headers fit the engine, no clearance. I couldn't tell you what the headers were too. just that they fit the 351w. cheapo stuff here... Probably fox body stuff.

1. Export brace - I agree - Ordered.

Anyone offer up any links to some shorty type headers that would work for me and not break the bank.
 

jikelly

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 9, 2003
872
53
99
Lubbock Tx
Jul 23, 2007
#6
  • Jul 23, 2007
  • #6
I'm assuming the headman shorty headers I've got on my 73 wouldn't do it for you. Dang those shock towers are close tot he engine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
4.8 LS swap in a 1975 coupe
  • DFlikks
  • Jul 7, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
8
Views
566
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Aug 21, 2025
DFlikks
D
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
587
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
119
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 7:02 PM
AeroCoupe
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
742
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?