• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Header Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter jrod92
  • Start date Start date Aug 16, 2007
J

jrod92

Member
Jun 17, 2004
66
0
7
Aug 16, 2007
#1
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #1
I just ordered a set of full length Flowtech headers for my 1987 GT, part # 12104. After about 6 hours of trying to fit them i find out they will not work. I understand that full length headers are a pain to put in but i have never had a problem before this. Also aftermarket parts dont always fit right but, even after removing the driver side motor mount and steering linkage there was no way the linkage would be able to turn with the header in place. I would like to use full length headers if possible which brand would you recommend?? by the way it is a 5 speed manual trans
 

rockytoohot

New Member
Jan 21, 2007
48
0
0
Aug 16, 2007
#2
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #2
I have found with most long tube headers you need to change your steering shaft. Maximum Motorsports makes a nice one for about $200.00
 

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Aug 16, 2007
#3
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #3
bbk.

they are fairly easy to install (i installed them by myself on 2 cars). they clear the steering shaft. you do have to raise the engine 4-5" on the pass side
 

408gt91

Member
Apr 29, 2007
114
0
16
N.H.
Aug 16, 2007
#4
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #4


bbk all the way,dont buy the chrome get the ceramic coated.there very easy to install.pull the spark plugs,put the front end up on jack stands,loosen up the driver side motor mount and jack it up by the bellhousing and install the header from underneith,once installed, lower the motor,tighten the motor mount. do the same on the other side,but this side installs from up top.you wont have to mess with your steering.
 

Attachments

  • incar013.webp
    66.5 KB · Views: 97
D

Deleted member 87397

Aug 16, 2007
#5
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #5
Flowtech FTL. Go BBK all the way. They cost more, but they are worth saving the hasle of install and they are a quality product.
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Aug 16, 2007
#6
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #6
Flow Tech FTL. BBK all the way man. They fit extremely well, they are much less of a hassle to install than most others, and they are quality.
 
D

Deleted member 87397

Aug 16, 2007
#7
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #7
Son of a Bi***! My first post did not show up after I submitted so I thought it did not go through.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Aug 16, 2007
#8
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #8
BBK makes a great set of long tube headers, their flange is nice and thick too, no warping!
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
2
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Aug 16, 2007
#9
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #9
you get what you pay for...we have had many problems with flowtech headers not fitting good.....some were not even close.
 

rpm182000

New Member
Jan 2, 2007
49
0
0
Valdosta, Ga.
Aug 16, 2007
#10
  • Aug 16, 2007
  • #10
slow95gt is running mac longtubes on his car and they where a pain in the arse to install but fit nicely,
 

79Mustang302

Founding Member
Dec 6, 2001
2,986
0
0
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 20, 2007
#11
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #11
what about bassani? i know they are expensive but is the stepped design and their quality worth it?
 

samickguy15

Member
Sep 1, 2005
404
0
16
Delavan, IL
Oct 20, 2007
#12
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #12
Stepped design helps with torque, but is not really worth the extra cost. I would also say stick with BBK's or similar
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Oct 20, 2007
#13
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #13
I run BBK LTs.

Mine went in pretty easy. I uncoupled the rag joint on the steering shaft and put the drivers side in and I pulled the starter on the passenger side and put it in. Bolted the starter and rag joint back together and was done in under 2 hours tops.
 

79Mustang302

Founding Member
Dec 6, 2001
2,986
0
0
Colorado Springs, CO
Oct 21, 2007
#14
  • Oct 21, 2007
  • #14
does anyone have any pics of the ground clearance of longtubes? my car is not lowered and i don't plan on lowering it, but in colorado ground clearance can be an issue with our roads.
 

bloopbloob

Member
Sep 27, 2006
578
4
16
Alberta
Oct 22, 2007
#15
  • Oct 22, 2007
  • #15
79Mustang302 said:
does anyone have any pics of the ground clearance of longtubes? my car is not lowered and i don't plan on lowering it, but in colorado ground clearance can be an issue with our roads.
Click to expand...

no pics, but i'm running bbk LT's on a stock height car, and they dont even hang as low as other stuff under the car. i live in canada, and our roads are total garbage, but they dont scrape
 

873Stang

New Member
Jun 19, 2006
221
0
0
riverside
Oct 22, 2007
#16
  • Oct 22, 2007
  • #16
bbk's really that good??? what about jba lt's
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
292
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
235
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
522
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
0
Engine Multiple o2 sensor codes, car runs terrible
  • 02newedge
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
456
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?