• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Headers for Stock 5.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter 50specialist
  • Start date Start date Apr 2, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#1
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #1
I'm doing research for my near future purchase of 1 5/8 shorty headers. My car has stock internals, but has offroad 2.5 inch x-pipes with 40 series flowmasters. I also have K&N filter, Pro-m 75mm MAF, 65mm TB and EGR, so I stuffed the stock intake manifold with as much air as possible, and I have msd cap/rotor kit, ford racing 9mm wires. I would like to purchase either summit, mac, or bbk. Which of these is the best for my stock 5.0?
 

1red95gt

New Member
Dec 22, 2006
31
0
0
Three Rivers, Mi
Apr 2, 2008
#2
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #2
which ever you get make sure it has a thick solid flange.. the others warp..
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Apr 2, 2008
#3
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #3
i would stay away from mac
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#4
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #4
SteedaGT9150 said:
i would stay away from mac
Click to expand...

Ok. BBks are good? I always had a good feeling about the bbk's.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Apr 2, 2008
#5
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #5
BBK's are good...but as stated...a solid flange mount where they are linked together is what you want. The seperate ones warp and are junk.
 

SteedaGT9150

Advanced Member
Nov 10, 2004
1,351
59
68
Maryland
Apr 2, 2008
#6
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #6
ive had no problems with my bbks, grey has the summit ones and he said they were pretty good too. i think hooker makes the summit headers, someone correct me if i am wrong
 

Beasty306GT

Active Member
Dec 19, 2002
671
4
28
Oxford,Mass
Apr 2, 2008
#7
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #7
I love mac shorty headers
 

5.0Torx

Active Member
Dec 30, 2007
252
3
29
Apr 2, 2008
#8
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #8
BBK unequals here. love em! i dd my car, rain or shine. Right now my body is rotting away and my BBKs look brand new.

the only thing i'd recommend you do with BBKs is check the flange. mine only had 3 spot welds on them, and when you really get cranking on it to seal a stupid exhaust leak, they may bend. mind did. had to pull it all back out, shell out the $$$ for new gaskets, chop off the flanges, and hammer them down flat. then i welded the living piss out of em! solid as can be now!
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 2, 2008
#9
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #9
Just keep the stock headers on, they are the BEST headers for stock 5.0's.
Once you get above 260RWHP then you can change them

You will notice a low end torque loss if you change them. YES! You will gain a little up top but not enough to notice. Again, just keep them on and put the money towards another mod.
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#10
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #10
373 gears is better? ^^
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 2, 2008
#11
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #11
50specialist said:
373 gears is better? ^^
Click to expand...

Rule of thumb for stock 5.0's

AOD = 373's

5spd = 355's
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#12
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #12
How much gas mileage will suffer with 373 gears on a AOD?
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Apr 2, 2008
#13
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #13
GTOReturns said:
Rule of thumb for stock 5.0's

AOD = 373's

5spd = 355's
Click to expand...

gears have debated to death on here. I thought most people chose 4:10's for autos and you could go 3:73 or 3:55 for the 5 spd cars. I have 3:73 and love them and from what I have read if you have had 3:73 for awhile you will not noticed much difference between 3:73 & 3:55 .

by the way 1 1/2 primarys are the best for shorty headers on a stock/mild motor. equal length shorties will get back some of the torque but they suck to install and take up alot of room. long tubes are the best gainers though.
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 2, 2008
#14
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #14
50specialist said:
How much gas mileage will suffer with 373 gears on a AOD?
Click to expand...

Its not that bad. Putting a higher stall speed converter in is what killed mine. But the performance gain and fun facter are out of this world!
 
G

GTOreturns

Well-Known Member
Oct 1, 2003
51
17
59
West Coast Best Coast
Apr 2, 2008
#15
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #15
greensvt21 said:
gears have debated to death on here. I thought most people chose 4:10's for autos and you could go 3:73 or 3:55 for the 5 spd cars. I have 3:73 and love them and from what I have read if you have had 3:73 for awhile you will not noticed much difference between 3:73 & 3:55 .

by the way 1 1/2 primarys are the best for shorty headers on a stock/mild motor. equal length shorties will get back some of the torque but they suck to install and take up alot of room. long tubes are the best gainers though.
Click to expand...

I put in 410's after my 373's and went 2 tenths slower in the 1/4.
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#16
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #16
GTOReturns said:
I put in 410's after my 373's and went 2 tenths slower in the 1/4.
Click to expand...

I guess it's because it killed your top speed, even though it improved your take-off.
 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#17
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #17
greensvt21 said:
gears have debated to death on here. I thought most people chose 4:10's for autos and you could go 3:73 or 3:55 for the 5 spd cars. I have 3:73 and love them and from what I have read if you have had 3:73 for awhile you will not noticed much difference between 3:73 & 3:55 .

by the way 1 1/2 primarys are the best for shorty headers on a stock/mild motor. equal length shorties will get back some of the torque but they suck to install and take up alot of room. long tubes are the best gainers though.
Click to expand...

So, overall, because this decision is a bit stressful , equal length will be even better for stock than unequal length? One or two guys will say that for stock or slightly modified mustangs, it is bad for low end, while a lot of them say that they are great. How much low-end will I loose, if any? I appreciate the advices all of you guys are giving, but when some say it's good, while a few say it's not that good, it gets pretty hard to decide wether to do it or not.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Apr 2, 2008
#18
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #18
GTOReturns said:
I put in 410's after my 373's and went 2 tenths slower in the 1/4.
Click to expand...

ahh gotcha. but at the track how about if you street the car 90% of the time? just curious don't own an auto.
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Apr 2, 2008
#19
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #19
50specialist said:
So, overall, because this decision is a bit stressful , equal length will be even better for stock than unequal length? One or two guys will say that for stock or slightly modified mustangs, it is bad for low end, while a lot of them say that they are great. How much low-end will I loose, if any? I appreciate the advices all of you guys are giving, but when some say it's good, while a few say it's not that good, it gets pretty hard to decide wether to do it or not.
Click to expand...

you are making it harder than it has to be, we went through this in tech. you are going to a larger primary tube so you are giving up flow velocity for flow volume, this will drop off some of low end torque and give you hp on the top side(are you still with me). they say 1 5/8 are for more modded 5.0's and stay with 1 1/2 headers for stock/mild 5.0's but try and find 1 1/2 headers. I didn't notice it to much but I have alot of mods, okay maybe still mild . going crazy over a set of shorties and thinking it's a big gain is nuts and spending huge dollars on shorties is the same nuts. the stock headers like I said over tech already gave the H.O 7-10hp over cast iron headers just the contours of the tubes suck. sooo get headers with a flange summit, ford racing , brothers, bbk are all going to do the same period!!! the only difference will be fit, some will go on nice some will be a pain. If you want a gain from headers and can deal with the tight fit and such then go long tubes, you get hp, torque improvements.

so to sum it up, you are going to lose low end torque..yes. you will gain upper range hp..yes. all the aftermarket unequal length headers do the same for gains, some are made crappy, fit crappy but still do the same.

here you go..
ford racing..fit the best, most people like them, no other issues or complaints.

bbk's ..alot of people on here use them, look good, chrome pits and gets rusty, some guys have had problems fitting to h-pipes, but most like them.

summit...good bang for the buck. no bad reviews yet. they stand behind thier stuff.

Brothers..don't know they just started making thier own headers.

MAC..individual flanges offer sealing problems, leak prone but still people like them. nio big fitting issues

JBA..good stuff, huge dollars.

pick a budjet, pick your headers.

stay away from flowtech, pace setter...junk..junk.

hope this helps.Best of luck to ya

 
5

50specialist

New Member
Mar 27, 2008
33
0
0
ft. lauderdale, FL
Apr 2, 2008
#20
  • Apr 2, 2008
  • #20
greensvt21 said:
you are making it harder than it has to be, we went through this in tech. you are going to a larger primary tube so you are giving up flow velocity for flow volume, this will drop off some of low end torque and give you hp on the top side(are you still with me). they say 1 5/8 are for more modded 5.0's and stay with 1 1/2 headers for stock/mild 5.0's but try and find 1 1/2 headers. I didn't notice it to much but I have alot of mods, okay maybe still mild . going crazy over a set of shorties and thinking it's a big gain is nuts and spending huge dollars on shorties is the same nuts. the stock headers like I said over tech already gave the H.O 7-10hp over cast iron headers just the contours of the tubes suck. sooo get headers with a flange summit, ford racing , brothers, bbk are all going to do the same period!!! the only difference will be fit, some will go on nice some will be a pain. If you want a gain from headers and can deal with the tight fit and such then go long tubes, you get hp, torque improvements.

so to sum it up, you are going to lose low end torque..yes. you will gain upper range hp..yes. all the aftermarket unequal length headers do the same for gains, some are made crappy, fit crappy but still do the same.

here you go..
ford racing..fit the best, most people like them, no other issues or complaints.

bbk's ..alot of people on here use them, look good, chrome pits and gets rusty, some guys have had problems fitting to h-pipes, but most like them.

summit...good bang for the buck. no bad reviews yet. they stand behind thier stuff.

Brothers..don't know they just started making thier own headers.

MAC..individual flanges offer sealing problems, leak prone but still people like them. nio big fitting issues

JBA..good stuff, huge dollars.

pick a budjet, pick your headers.

stay away from flowtech, pace setter...junk..junk.

hope this helps.Best of luck to ya

Click to expand...

thanks. I get it. Is 1 1/2 bigger than 1 5/8's? I thought it was smaller than 1 3/4's. I'm going to be specific on what I have now. I have a 2 1/2 X-pipes with no cats and flowmasters. I have K&N filter, 65mm throttle body and EGR, Pro-M 75mm mass air sensor calibrated for stock injectors, msd cap and rotor, ford racing 9mm wires, smog pump delete, and I will advance my timing to possibly 13 to 14 degrees with 93 octane fuel. I now have stock 3.27 gears, stock AOD trans and stock headers. I already filled the stock intake manifold with the most air as possible. Longtubes will be better for stock engine then? Just curious.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
S
5.0 Rebuild
  • smittys7up
  • Nov 29, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
524
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 20, 2025
Noobz347
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Progress Thread 1989 LX 5.0 convertible - mild project
  • Scott_S
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 4 5 6
Replies
103
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 6:42 AM
AeroCoupe
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?