• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Help on Choosing new intake

  • Thread starter Thread starter Credzba
  • Start date Start date Aug 27, 2004
C

Credzba

Member
Jul 11, 2004
37
0
6
Aug 27, 2004
#1
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #1
I am building a 347 stroker with AFR 185 heads.
AFR suggests "RPM Performer, Vic Jr.".
I presume that means either the RPM Performer or the Victor Jr. as I didnt see anything with the combined name on Edelbrock site.

Edelbrock lists these:
Performer RPM 302 (1500-6500 RPM)
RPM Air-Gap 302 (1500-6500 rpm)
Torker II 302 (2500-6500 RPM)
Victor Jr. 302 (3500-8000 RPM)

Since this is just a good-times car for around town, I was thinking either the performer or ... I really want the air-gap. I see the vic. jr. as just being to high rpm range for city driving.

So, what do you think, and if you agree with the air-gap, will it fit under the hood on my stock 66 mustang?
 
6

66HertzClone

New Member
Aug 24, 2004
428
0
0
Central New Jersey
Aug 27, 2004
#2
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #2
I purchased a 331 stroker from Keith Craft. They include a Vic Jr. with the engine I chose. I had them substitute an Air Gap instead of the Vic. I also had the cam changed to a less radical one than they supply. My engine has the AFR185 heads, and I am using a Speed Demon 650 vac secondary carb. Keith Craft sells the unit as delivering 450 HP, with the changes I asked for my engine on their dyno ran 410Hp at 4800 RPM and 430 # torque at 4100 RPM. Despite the drop in HP I am still happy with the output of my engine. I have a C4 trans and power brakes so having adequate manifold vacuum was kind of important.

By the way the Air Gap is no high than the Perform RPM unit. My only comment with this manifold is it seems the water outlet has been relocated slightly. I had great difficulty getting the lower bolt in place, I used a chrome outlet and the supplied bolt would not fit between the timing cover and the outlet. I had to cut it shorter by 1/4 inch in order to fit it between, a real PIA to tighten as well.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 27, 2004
#3
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #3
Just my opinion:
The RPM is overrated for the SBF.
I used a Torker 289 on a 306 before and after a short swap to an RPM, the Torker blew that intake away.
Your engine will have even more cubes and torque, I can't imagine using an RPM on that engine. I wouldn't anyway.
Either Victor or a mild single plane... don't bother with dual plane on an SBF.
Good luck
Dave

BTW: I am comparing to a Torker 289, NOT a Torker 2 (aka Torker 302). They are completely different animals.
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Aug 27, 2004
#4
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #4
I want to clarify:

Victor: Higher rpms, some strip, a little low on street manners.

Mild single plane: Street manners, more useable torque, a little less off top... But are you really going there with a 347 anyway?
 
C

Credzba

Member
Jul 11, 2004
37
0
6
Aug 27, 2004
#5
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #5
I am confused

I don't really understand intakes, thus the question.
Ratio you said mild single plane for street, what is a mild single plane?
I currently have a performer 289 intake from my old 289. Would it work just as well for street use on the 347 and save me 200$ ?
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Aug 27, 2004
#6
  • Aug 27, 2004
  • #6
What cam are you going to use? Velocity is what you worry about. A runner sized for a 302 will have much greater velocity on a motor 45ci bigger. I've not heard anybody with 347s complain the the Vic jr kills the torque. My brother has one and it does great. Maybe someone else that has driven a car with a 347 and vic jr will chime in.
 
V

VictorII

New Member
Jun 19, 2004
148
1
0
Cotati, CA
Aug 29, 2004
#7
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #7
What are your rear end and first geat ratios? And what are your cam specs? The idea is to keep the engine in its power band. The RPM, with decent gears is great for street. The Jr. is better on the track for higher RPM bands. I am really happy with my RPM on my streeter. The Jr. has poor street manners in my opinion. Subjective, I realize, but that is my opinion.
 
B

billy

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
356
0
16
White Lake, MI
Aug 29, 2004
#8
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #8
I am running a 347 in my 65'..... I am also running a Victor jr. manifold... Absolutly no problems... Car is very streetable... Personally I think the 185's are a little small for a 347... I am very happy with my 205's... I am running a very agressive Ed Curtis Custom Rollor camshaft and the vehicle is totally streetable... I cruised Woodward Dreamcruise with no problems at all.. Very drivable and streetable....

You have to remember those 45 extra cubes are going to suck up some of the motor... So a totally radical set up on a 302 will be tame on a 347.....

But to give you a realistic answer we need to know more info on the vehicle.... Camshaft specs, rear end gear, convertor, carb, e.t.c.....

Billy
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Aug 29, 2004
#9
  • Aug 29, 2004
  • #9
Not an expert here, but from what I've read/heard/seen the Weiand Stealth seems to be a great all around manifold. Seems to make great power on strokers as well. Just my .02

The Swede
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
505
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
721
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Hi. Im new here and new to the Megasquirt scenes..
  • 67Fairlane
  • Jul 19, 2022
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
763
The Welcome Wagon Jul 19, 2022
General karthief
7
Suggestion for camshaft. Help appreciated.
  • 7Srancher
  • Nov 30, 2022
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
971
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Dec 3, 2022
CAMTWO1070
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?