• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

HO vs. non-HO intake , how to tell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MrKwik
  • Start date Start date Jan 8, 2006

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jan 8, 2006
#1
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #1
I was looking for a stock 87-93 intake for the motor I'm puting in my 86 GT and i know the later intakes are worth a little power over the 86 one. The guy told me that it came off his 88 Mustang. I had specified I wanted a the Mustang one, not the Lincon\couger one. All the 87 up mustang intakes I have had in the past had HO stamped on top under where the plate goes. This one doesn't. It also has a circle with 86 cast into it under the TB opening. So Im guessing this is the non HO lincon intake but how can you tell for sure? Is it the same as the one already on my 86? And besides the TB opening size, is there any other difference between it and the later Mustang intakes?
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Jan 8, 2006
#2
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #2
My 87 stock ho intake had ho casted in it but had 86 in circle also.
 

RacEoHolic330

I like to dress like a pretty girl
15 Year Member
Mar 4, 2003
4,014
1,698
203
Allentown, PA
Jan 8, 2006
#3
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #3
Yea, mine had H.O. casted right under the removable plate on the top.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 8, 2006
#4
  • Jan 8, 2006
  • #4
If it's not an HO intake, I have both an upper and lower (HO upper) sitting in my garage i'd be willing to part with. They are both stock and slightly dirty.
 

z2o_what

Member
Mar 31, 2005
309
1
19
princeton, WV
Jan 9, 2006
#5
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #5
the intake you discribed is the '86 mustang intake...witch i think is the same as a non-h.o. intake

IMO the power gain with the h.o. intake over the standard is not noticeable.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jan 9, 2006
#6
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #6
z2o_what said:
the intake you discribed is the '86 mustang intake...witch i think is the same as a non-h.o. intake

IMO the power gain with the h.o. intake over the standard is not noticeable.
Click to expand...
I was thinking they were the same but I was thinking that even my 86GT had HO stamped into it. But Im still wondering if the only difference is the opening for the TB, which is easy enough to change. or are the runners different somehow?


srothfuss said:
If it's not an HO intake, I have both an upper and lower (HO upper) sitting in my garage i'd be willing to part with. They are both stock and slightly dirty.
Click to expand...

Would you sell just the upper? The lower I got is real nice.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 9, 2006
#7
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #7
If you pay'd for shipping, I would be willing to part with it for free. I can take some pictures later today once I am out of work and send them you.
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 9, 2006
#8
  • Jan 9, 2006
  • #8
OK, here are two pictures of the upper&lower (I'll seperate it from the lower later)





I have more pictures of it. I sent you a PM (obviously) with my email address if you are still interested.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
#9
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #9
Major props for this dude for going out of his way to hook a fellow stanger up.

The intake showed up today. Looks good. Thanks again brother
 

srothfuss

Last night I stabbed the same guy 7 times in a row
Oct 17, 2004
1,796
3
0
Woodward Ave.
Jan 13, 2006
#10
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #10
Sweet! did everything make it OK?
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jan 13, 2006
#11
  • Jan 13, 2006
  • #11
srothfuss said:
Sweet! did everything make it OK?
Click to expand...
UPS mangled the box the intake was well padded so it took the beating fine.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
899
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
196
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
A
Vacuum line help
  • Artyom
  • Aug 27, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
4K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 26, 2024
Artyom
A
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?