• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

how many are EGR less on the street?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jackchan
  • Start date Start date Nov 6, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

jackchan

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
507
0
0
Mobile Alabama
Nov 6, 2005
#1
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #1
I once removed my EGR vavle and installed a plate for my throttle stuff to mount on. The car ran fine but I only ran it at the track (old combo, old notchback) well I still have that plate laying around and was thinking if I go to an explorer intake, or cobra I may want to do that same plate thing again for my throttle linkage. I didnt run a chip or anything before......and DOnt remember having any problems with idle, etc.....but how many of you are going EGR less on the street and how does it effect your cars?
thanks
Jack
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Nov 6, 2005
#2
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #2
I just changed back to EGR. The car ran decent but I couldn't advance my timing at all without getting detonation. Also since I was thinking about going FI I figured that I needed to go back to EGR.

If you want to go with no EGR let me know. I have a GT40 upper intake, ported explorer lower and an EGR delete plate for the TB to bolt up to for sale.
 
8

87'GTstang

New Member
Feb 16, 2004
1,025
0
0
Nov 6, 2005
#3
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #3
RYC CUKR said:
have a GT40 upper intake, ported explorer lower and an EGR delete plate for the TB to bolt up to for sale.
Click to expand...
Does it have internal EGR on it? What "kind" of gt40 upper intake is it?
 

jackchan

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
507
0
0
Mobile Alabama
Nov 6, 2005
#4
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #4
how ported is the lower? how much for the upper and lower. I have the plate, or do you mean the spacer? my price range isnt very high but if can work out a deal I'll try to get it from ya. PM me
 

mbsprinks281

Member
Apr 19, 2005
58
2
9
Lockport, IL
Nov 6, 2005
#5
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #5
I dumped the EGR along with all the lines and havent had a problem.
 

1EVIL88VERT

New Member
Jul 12, 2004
314
0
0
Dyess AFB, TX
Nov 6, 2005
#6
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #6
mine has been gone for a couple of years and no problems
 
9

95cobradude

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
194
0
0
long island, ny
Nov 6, 2005
#7
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #7
dumped it on my 95 cobra
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Nov 6, 2005
#8
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #8
NOt to thread jack..but when you remove the EGR do you notice a change in gas mileage ?
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Nov 6, 2005
#9
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #9
I removed my egr when I changed motors, so I can't help with real world fuel economy consequences. However, all of the theory is there to support that conclusion.
I would like to hear of peoples experiences on this. I plan on reinstalling the egr fairly soon, and have been keeping very close tabs on my economy, so I should have some reliable results.

I have been without egr for a few years now with several 351w combos. I don't seem to have drivability issues, and only have the CEL problem. From what I have heard the consequences of removing the egr seem to be hit or miss. Some do just fine others don't fair as well.
 

jackchan

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
507
0
0
Mobile Alabama
Nov 6, 2005
#10
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #10
Some do just fine others don't fair as well.
Click to expand...

i wonder if that has anything to do with automatic computers and manual? Also for the one's with EGR removed.......are you running cats or smog pump still? ..........I see many turbo and blower cars with a pump used to pull air from the crankcase.....to better seal the rings? Or something else?
Jack
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Nov 6, 2005
#11
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #11
EGR and the AIR system are independant.

Jack, I think you are referring to an Evacuation or scavenging pump.
 

jackchan

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
507
0
0
Mobile Alabama
Nov 6, 2005
#12
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #12
yea that was what I meant. one side of the pump pulls and the other pushs thru the h pipe between the cats. My smog pump is still attached but no line from that side to cats....
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Nov 6, 2005
#13
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #13
jackchan said:
i wonder if that has anything to do with automatic computers and manual? Also for the one's with EGR removed.......are you running cats or smog pump still? ..........I see many turbo and blower cars with a pump used to pull air from the crankcase.....to better seal the rings? Or something else?
Jack
Click to expand...

Interesting, the computer could have something to do with it. Especially if the timing curves are different?
Also, compression ratio. Coolant/oil temps, maybe. H/C/I combo?
Compression ratio is probably the big one though. Mines in my sig. pretty low.

I do not have cats currently. That will be changing fairly soon though, as I will have to pass emissions next summer.

I have wondered if a stock smog pump could work as a crankcase vac pump. It has been several years since I have seen the stock pump though. Is there a provision for an inlet hose? They are also used when low tension rings are used.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 6, 2005
#14
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #14
EGR intact, although not working correctly. I get a ping at cruse on the highway.
 
M

mustang-a-holic

New Member
Jul 8, 2005
51
0
0
Nov 6, 2005
#15
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #15
I made my own egr delete.

However, my puter still thinks its there.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Nov 6, 2005
#16
  • Nov 6, 2005
  • #16
87'GTstang said:
Does it have internal EGR on it? What "kind" of gt40 upper intake is it?
Click to expand...

It is a GT40 tubular upper. The problem with the EGR is that the internal EGR tube is cracked and broken on the upper. I tapped out the lower and upper and installed some 3/8" or 1/2" threaded plugs to block off the EGR. I have the EGR delete plate that does away with the EGR spacer.

jackchan I shot ya pm about the intake.
 

18mustangs

New Member
Jun 8, 2005
533
1
0
Virginia Beach, VA
Nov 7, 2005
#17
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #17
vristang said:
I removed my egr when I changed motors, so I can't help with real world fuel economy consequences. However, all of the theory is there to support that conclusion.
I would like to hear of peoples experiences on this. I plan on reinstalling the egr fairly soon, and have been keeping very close tabs on my economy, so I should have some reliable results.

I have been without egr for a few years now with several 351w combos. I don't seem to have drivability issues, and only have the CEL problem. From what I have heard the consequences of removing the egr seem to be hit or miss. Some do just fine others don't fair as well.
Click to expand...

Glad to hear you're reinstalling your EGR! A couple of years ago I capped off the EGR valve without turning EGR off in the computer like the guys above when I put my LT headers on (the LTs didn't have the EGR bung), and my car pinged like crazy, and mileage did go down a little as well. When I did my fox TB conversion I installed the Fox EGR setup and the car stopped pinging and mileage improved. IMO EGR is a good thing, and since there are no performance gains from deleting it my advice to everyone is to keep it.
Tim
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
Nov 7, 2005
#18
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #18
mine been off all summer. no problems for me. i don't have any chip or anything.
 

jackchan

New Member
Oct 17, 2004
507
0
0
Mobile Alabama
Nov 7, 2005
#19
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #19
one of the reasons i deleted mine the first go round was that I had access to a 65mm tb but no spacer so thats why I deleted it.......to save on having to buy the EGR spacer. I may do the same thing this go round. Depends on how it drives. I'm wanting a chip burning software so I can burn my own chips.....but will have to see how it all plays out.
Thanks
Jack
 

88_GT_5_oh

Sportin' a turbo 5.0 in Canadistan
Jul 4, 2004
1
0
1
WPG/MB/CA
Nov 7, 2005
#20
  • Nov 7, 2005
  • #20
jackchan said:
one of the reasons i deleted mine the first go round was that I had access to a 65mm tb but no spacer so thats why I deleted it.......to save on having to buy the EGR spacer. I may do the same thing this go round. Depends on how it drives. I'm wanting a chip burning software so I can burn my own chips.....but will have to see how it all plays out.
Thanks
Jack
Click to expand...


thats the exact reason i deleted mine. i got a tb for cheap but no EGR spacer. i didn't wanna spend more money on the spacer so i deleted it
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
874
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Engine Popping noise in the intake. Frustrated still.
  • esteban31065
  • Apr 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
15
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 23, 2025
gkomo
new :poo: box, may need to hit you guys up for 79-82 info when i fix thIs turd.
  • rednotch
  • Sep 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
40
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 4, 2026
Noobz347
T
Fox 1993 FOX High Idle
  • TheJay806
  • Dec 24, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
37
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
Resolved Fixing a GT40P Valvetrain nightmare
  • foxbodyclark
  • May 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 24, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?