• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

How much did all those lowering springs actually lower? SN95 question

  • Thread starter Thread starter bennylava
  • Start date Start date Aug 23, 2022
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 23, 2022
#1
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #1
About 5 years ago I bought some lowering springs for my 94 Gt from Late Model Resto. They claimed to lower the car 2", in reality it was 1" at most. But upon closer inspection, when running 18" wheels, the 94-98 cars look like they really should be lowered somewhere around 3 inches. Maybe it's 3.5", because you need to account for raising the car up an inch with the bigger rims. Do you agree? How low do you think the car should go if I still want it to be somewhat streetable? Remember, it gets raised a whole inch by the 18" wheels. I prefer not to sacrifice any tire height.

I like the car to be very low, but still above "slammed". I'm hoping someone here knows the right set of springs to accomplish this. I don't think it's the obligatory Eibach Pro kit. IIRC those only lowered the car something like 1.5". Not nearly enough.

Thanks!
 

Essn95

5 Year Member
Jun 21, 2017
817
622
113
Aug 23, 2022
#2
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #2
Coilovers will get you where you need to be. To look good imo you need H&R springs with no isos which yields the biggest drop of the springs
 
Reactions: bennylava

bird_dog0347

still married haven't seen testicles in years
15 Year Member
Jun 7, 2012
2,300
2,027
174
Little Elm, TX
Aug 23, 2022
#3
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #3
The size of the rim doesn't raise or lower the car, you need to pay attention to the overall diameter of the tires. If you want a ride height at a specific place or have the ability to adjust it easily, you'd be better off with a Coil Over setup.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,257
17,941
224
Massachusetts
Aug 23, 2022
#4
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #4
It’s not that these cars sit too high, but more that the fender gaps are just so large that the car needs to drop that far just to close up the gaps. There are drawbacks to lowering the car too much on stock suspension parts in terms of handling and practicality (speed bumps for example).

Did you install new isolators with the springs? Were they poly by any chance? That will lift the car up 1/4" or so more than if you use rubber isos.
 
Last edited: Sep 11, 2023
M

mustystang

Claiming to be an Alpha Chassis
Aug 20, 2022
47
7
28
TX
Aug 23, 2022
#5
  • Aug 23, 2022
  • #5
I agree with the above. Stock suspension is best and not as rough a ride. Get some bigger tires that fill up the wells. If money is no object then maybe a lowered setup would be doable. There's better performance parts I would be spending my money on though. I get enough rocks and road tar as is, no way would I consider lowering something that didn't come lowered from factory.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 24, 2022
#6
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • #6
Mustang5L5 said:
It’s not that these cars sit too high, but more that the fender gaps are just so large that the car needs to drop that far just to close up the gaps. There are drawbacks to lowering the car too much on stock suspension parts in terms of handling and practicality (speed bumps for example)
Click to expand...

Yeah that's the real issue, sucking up that gap. Speed bumps used to give me trouble in my old car. Maybe an air suspension could help with that while giving a better ride. Raise it just a bit for parking lots. There's some air suspension racing company so I don't think handling would suffer too much by going that route. But I'm not going road racing, so taking corners at high speed isn't a huge concern.
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 24, 2022
#7
  • Aug 24, 2022
  • #7
The FR C-springs lowered my car the exact amounts quoted in the catalog.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 25, 2022
#8
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #8
mustystang said:
I knew someone who had adjustable air suspension on a VW. He also had those slanted tires that look ridiculous so..
Here's a good article on tilted tires. https://www.hotcars.com/tilted-wheels-explained-and-if-its-useful/
I am a disbeliever in tilted tires. Increased inner tire wear, which is important. Now unless you are driving in circles I can't see any practicality unless you need that crutch to take corners and keep up. I bet they would fail at some point unpredictably as well. I also wouldn't trust air suspension to hold up on some of my corners. You may need new wheels or spacers to get what you want, but there can be benefits to not being so tight as well. I personally run square and as wide and big as possible without adjusting stock wheels. Newer gen mustangs can go significantly wider than what I run though. At some point I may consider slightly wider in the rears. I may have slight rubbing in the front at full lock currently.
Click to expand...

WhiteCobra95 said:
The FR C-springs lowered my car the exact amounts quoted in the catalog.
Click to expand...

When did you buy them though? I bought the early models, before they changed them. Didn't feel like getting some kind of refund and redoing all the work since the car is mainly a garage queen. But when I go to working on it again and driving it again, their springs gotta go.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 25, 2022
#9
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #9
mustystang said:
I knew someone who had adjustable air suspension on a VW. He also had those slanted tires that look ridiculous so..
Here's a good article on tilted tires. https://www.hotcars.com/tilted-wheels-explained-and-if-its-useful/
I am a disbeliever in tilted tires. Increased inner tire wear, which is important. Now unless you are driving in circles I can't see any practicality unless you need that crutch to take corners and keep up. I bet they would fail at some point unpredictably as well. I also wouldn't trust air suspension to hold up on some of my corners. You may need new wheels or spacers to get what you want, but there can be benefits to not being so tight as well. I personally run square and as wide and big as possible without adjusting stock wheels. Newer gen mustangs can go significantly wider than what I run though. At some point I may consider slightly wider in the rears. I may have slight rubbing in the front at full lock currently.
Click to expand...

Yeah but I don't think tilting the tires is actually necessary if you have air suspension. I believe you could put in an air suspension system that didn't actually do that. The accomplish it on all those squarebody trucks, raising and lowing the truck 6-8". Also I'll try to find that air suspension racing company... can't remember where I saw that. It may have been on My Classic Car. They had some old camaro (among a few others) that they'd road race on their air suspension. They wanted to prove to everyone that handling doesn't die just because you went with the soft cushy air ride. This was probably 8 years ago though. Been a while.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 25, 2022
#10
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #10
Your 4 minute editing time royally sucks, admin. I'd change it. Just going through and correcting a few spelling and grammar errors takes longer than that.
 
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 25, 2022
#11
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #11
Either that or some people will just make a lot more posts I guess.
 

WhiteCobra95

10 Year Member
May 2, 2006
634
177
74
Aug 25, 2022
#12
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #12
bennylava said:
When did you buy them though? I bought the early models, before they changed them. Didn't feel like getting some kind of refund and redoing all the work since the car is mainly a garage queen. But when I go to working on it again and driving it again, their springs gotta go.
Click to expand...
I installed mine in 2009. They were purchased a year or two before that. You make a good point, some parts can change over time if they get re-sourced. I would hope that FR quality control would keep the same general specifications and performance. However, there are no guarantees with aftermarket parts. I can only give you the limited information I have based on the experience with my mostly stock car.

I think the other guys make some good points. You have to choose your suspension parts to fit the driving characteristic you're looking for. Then select a wheel and tire combination to fit the wheel wells and performance goal as needed. Using springs to extend or retract the suspension too far from stock is going to compromise the performance and in some cases have serious adverse effects on how it drives. This why some companies like Steeda offer offset balljoints to maintain correct suspension geometry while lowering the wheel position and body at the same time. (I've never used them and can't comment on how well they work.)
 

Essn95

5 Year Member
Jun 21, 2017
817
622
113
Aug 25, 2022
#13
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #13
Here is me on B springs with no isolators. 275/35/18 tires on 18x9 wheel
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 25, 2016
27,926
10,572
203
polk county florida
Aug 25, 2022
#14
  • Aug 25, 2022
  • #14
bennylava said:
Your 4 minute editing time royally sucks, admin. I'd change it. Just going through and correcting a few spelling and grammar errors takes longer than that.
Click to expand...
What are you talking about?
 

TIGGER

Founding Member
Mar 6, 2000
877
244
104
Portland, OR
Aug 26, 2022
#15
  • Aug 26, 2022
  • #15
I lowered my wife’s old beater 96gt last summer with H&R springs and fox struts. I thought the stance looked good and it rode nice. I always hated the wheels though but they were 18’s.
 

Attachments

  • 5A8B52C1-2ED3-4E3A-AFCD-7C215B5BFF5B.webp
    432.4 KB · Views: 289
Reactions: General karthief
B

bennylava

Member
Oct 18, 2017
30
1
8
Aug 30, 2022
#16
  • Aug 30, 2022
  • #16
Essn95 said:
Coilovers will get you where you need to be. To look good imo you need H&R springs with no isos which yields the biggest drop of the springs
Click to expand...

Well my question has pretty much been answered. So I might as well ask you - What's the story on those two-top cobras? Was that a Ford factory deal? Or was it some aftermarket company? I always wanted to install some kind of removable hard top on my car. Even if I had to pay some engineering company to do it... or something.
 

Essn95

5 Year Member
Jun 21, 2017
817
622
113
Aug 30, 2022
#17
  • Aug 30, 2022
  • #17
bennylava said:
Well my question has pretty much been answered. So I might as well ask you - What's the story on those two-top cobras? Was that a Ford factory deal? Or was it some aftermarket company? I always wanted to install some kind of removable hard top on my car. Even if I had to pay some engineering company to do it... or something.
Click to expand...
It was a factory ford option in 1995 only. They produced 499 with the removable hardtop out of the 1003 convertibles from that year. I have seen someone install the Ford Hardtop on a normal vert with minimal modification. However, it is nearly impossible to find the hardtops. There is an aftermarket company called smooth line that makes hardtops for convertibles as well.

Smoothline.com

www.smoothline.com
 

BlakeusMaximus

Still got to try a little lube on my speedo head
5 Year Member
Jul 12, 2017
2,474
1,348
173
Aug 30, 2022
#18
  • Aug 30, 2022
  • #18
My buddy's dad had a black one too, years ago. I didn't know what to think when I first saw that car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
277
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
757
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
R
Help to identify lowering springs
  • Rembrant
  • Feb 4, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
991
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 5, 2024
Mcmahst
Intended Headers and Trans, questions about fitment
  • from6to8
  • Aug 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 6, 2025
from6to8
4.6 question for those in the know....
  • LILCBRA
  • Aug 30, 2024
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 4, 2024
Adieu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?