• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

How much faster is the 94-95 than the 96-98?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rudeone707
  • Start date Start date Dec 23, 2003
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
43
Fairfield, Ca
www.agpnet.net
Dec 23, 2003
#1
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #1
Last night i pulled up next to a 96 gt with 17" saleens and an s351 wing at a stoplight. So i look at him and he looks back. We both took off normal then i hear him floor it, so i floor it to. By third i had a car on him. Then we were both driving at about 20 and we get ready to race from a roll. He honks 3 times and we both take off. By the end of 3rd i had 2 cars on him and i shut down because he doesnt look like hes catching up.

Are the 4.6s really that slow, or is the driver hella crappy?
 

MO351

Founding Member
Jan 14, 2002
136
0
16
49
MO USA
Dec 23, 2003
#2
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #2
The stock 96-98 4.6 SOHC is a mid 15 sec car at best. Every once in a while you might find a factory freak that runs low 15s but on street tires they are a mid 15 sec car. My 96 that I used to have, on street tires and stock, ran 15.4 @ 94 with 2.3-2.4 60s. If you can get traction in them they will do better. But that's the same with any stang. I might add that my 96 was the stripped version (248A Package) like the GTS. Weighed in around 3200 pounds and a 5-speed with 2.73's.
 

red94fiveo

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
1,269
0
0
44
Wichita, KS
Dec 23, 2003
#3
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #3
Every 96-98 4.6 that I have ever been in/driven (about 3 or 4) has pretty much been a dog. I know both car were rated about the same from the factory, but I would bet the difference lies in the power curves, the 4.6 just don't seem to have the same twist down low. Not to mention how much easier and cheaper it is to mod our cars.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
42
San Diego
Dec 23, 2003
#4
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #4
Yeah when i was bone stock i raced a couple, and beat them both by a little over a car, that made extra content with my 95 purchase.
 

redsvtcontour

Founding Member
Apr 17, 2002
175
0
0
Detroit
Dec 23, 2003
#5
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #5
WhiteDevil said:
Yeah when i was bone stock i raced a couple, and beat them both by a little over a car, that made extra content with my 95 purchase.
Click to expand...
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Dec 23, 2003
#6
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #6
A stock 96-98 is the slowest V8 Mustang in recent memory. The 4.6L is handicapped by its cute little bore. On a 2V, it's hard to get enough airflow. I'd like to see Ford come out with a 5.0L cammer with the same bore/stroke as the 302.

Dave
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
43
Fairfield, Ca
www.agpnet.net
Dec 23, 2003
#7
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #7
HairyCanary said:
The 4.6L is handicapped by its cute little bore.
Click to expand...

Thats funny
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
48
Portland, OR
www.cardomain.com
Dec 23, 2003
#8
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #8
Stock 96-98 4.6 is slow than hell , I been racing 5 speed coupe and I beat him , (I have heavy vert 3900 lb and 5 speed)
Plus 99 up 4.6 GT isn't that fast eather , I have few races and I beat few times )
5.0 is way to go
 

94Blue302GT

Member
Oct 20, 2003
704
3
19
43
Chicago
Dec 23, 2003
#9
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #9
I think the newer 4.6 is pretty cool with technology. 287 horse i think? Dual cam, right? All's i know is that my friend and i call it the "hemi head" mustang cuz the heads look huge in the mustang. I think a little of that dual cam technology in the famous 5.0 would be great!
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
39
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
www.cardomain.com
Dec 23, 2003
#10
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #10
some guy in the other forum about the tailights claims a 13.774 with Pullies, Filter, X-Pipe, Mufflers and a Chip. he even has the slips to prove it. that sounds faster then my car, is this ?
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Dec 23, 2003
#11
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #11
BlueOvalStangGT said:
some guy in the other forum about the tailights claims a 13.774 with Pullies, Filter, X-Pipe, Mufflers and a Chip. he even has the slips to prove it. that sounds faster then my car, is this ?
Click to expand...
That's doable. Any car can be fast, it's the driver that gets good ET's. Mid-13's for a 99+ 4.6L with every single bolt-on and drag radials is typical with a decent driver.

Dave
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
43
Fairfield, Ca
www.agpnet.net
Dec 23, 2003
#12
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #12
94Blue302GT said:
I think the newer 4.6 is pretty cool with technology. 287 horse i think? Dual cam, right? All's i know is that my friend and i call it the "hemi head" mustang cuz the heads look huge in the mustang. I think a little of that dual cam technology in the famous 5.0 would be great!
Click to expand...
You must be thinking about the DOHC cobras. The 96-98 4.6 are rated at 215 hp, and are not DOHC
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
39
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
www.cardomain.com
Dec 23, 2003
#13
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #13
posted by hairy canary- That's doable. Any car can be fast, it's the driver that gets good ET's. Mid-13's for a 99+ 4.6L with every single bolt-on and drag radials is typical with a decent driver.

its not a 99+, its a 98 GT
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Dec 23, 2003
#14
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #14
BlueOvalStangGT said:
its not a 99+, its a 98 GT
Click to expand...
With just bolt-ons, I'd be very surprised. With a head swap, and bolt-ons, then yes, doable.

Dave
 
R

rudeone707

New Member
May 17, 2003
1,829
0
0
43
Fairfield, Ca
www.agpnet.net
Dec 23, 2003
#15
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #15
yeah with the PI heads and PI cam i think that could happen. Are you sure that he didnt have a 98 Cobra?
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Dec 23, 2003
#16
  • Dec 23, 2003
  • #16
94Blue302GT said:
I think a little of that dual cam technology in the famous 5.0 would be great!
Click to expand...
Perhaps, or not. We can make all the airflow we need with just 2 valves. There are 4 valve heads that have been created for the 5.0L, but they're pointless. I'm not convinced at this point that any of the current modular technology is an improvement over pushrod. Different, yes, but better? ...

Dave
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
39
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
www.cardomain.com
Dec 24, 2003
#17
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #17
well his name is 984.6gt so i doubt its a cobra.
 
S

SuperDust22

The Power of Pixie Dust?!
Oct 19, 2003
1,821
0
0
41
Gilbert,AZ
members.cardomain.com
Dec 24, 2003
#18
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #18
My first time at the track I raced a 1997 GT 5 speed. I he ran a 15.5 stock. I ran a 14.9 with a few blots ons. Not every thing I have done now. Plus I have a AODE.
 

Slow5.0

Active Member
Feb 13, 2003
2,554
0
46
48
Portland, OR
www.cardomain.com
Dec 24, 2003
#19
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #19
94-95 GT have 215 hp , 285 ft-lbs
94-95 Cobra 240 hp , 285 ft-lbs
96-97 GT 215 hp , 285 ft-lbs
98 GT 225 hp , 290 ft-lbs
96-98 Cobra 305 hp , 300 ft-lbs
99 GT 260 hp , 300 ft-lbs
00-03 GT 260 hp , 302 ft-lbs
99-02 Cobra 320 hp , 317 ft-lbs
03 Cobra 380 hp , 390 ft-lbs

THIS HP and torque is at flywheel
 

Rootus

Officially Addicted
Feb 8, 2003
6,659
1
0
52
Portland, Oregon
Dec 24, 2003
#20
  • Dec 24, 2003
  • #20
Seth5.0 said:
03 Cobra 380 hp , 390 ft-lbs
Click to expand...
390/390 for the Cobra. And it's underrated, unlike most/all of the others on the list.

Dave
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 6
Next
1 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
M
Progress Thread '96 Saleen S281 restoration project
  • m98alissa
  • Apr 16, 2020
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Apr 3, 2021
2Blue2
I
Exorcising a '78
  • IICrew
  • Mar 29, 2020
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 13 14 15
Replies
287
Views
33K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Apr 14, 2023
IICrew
I
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?