• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

how to identify 351w as opposed to a 302 or 289?

  • Thread starter Thread starter vin1382
  • Start date Start date Feb 19, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
V

vin1382

New Member
Oct 17, 2003
27
0
0
Feb 19, 2004
#1
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #1
How can i be absolutly certain my 1970 mach 1 has 351w and not a 289 or 302? I heard they look very similar.. just want to make sure some moron didnt plant a 302 in there for some reason!
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 19, 2004
#2
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #2
if you look at the front of the block on the driver side where the timing cover is, a 351 will have an extra reinforcement cast in to the block, it will angle up from the very front of the timing cover to the intake sealing surface, i can't find a good pic, or i would post it.other than that the 351w is quite a bit wider than a 289/302, hope that helps
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 19, 2004
#3
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #3
The deck height of the 351W is almost an inch higher than the 289/302. This cuases the heads to be forther apart, just over half an inch on each side. So the manifold is about 1.5 inches wider where it meets the heads. If you cannot judge by the width (and many cannot if they are not side by side), then look at the area where the distributor comes out of the block.

If the visible base of the distributor is about even with the bottom of the intake manifold it is a 289/302. If it is about an inch BELOW the bottom of the intake manifold it is a 351W. Wont even get into FEs and Clevelands here since they are more easily distinguished
 

351LX

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
1,007
0
0
Regina, Saskatchewan
Feb 19, 2004
#4
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #4
I usually look at the thermostat housing.On a 302 the lower bolt is behind the front cover so you need a wrench to get at it but on a 351w with the higher deck you can get at the lower thermostat housing bolt with a socket as it is above the front cover.
 
L

Lswhat

New Member
Feb 9, 2004
126
0
0
Orlando
Feb 19, 2004
#5
  • Feb 19, 2004
  • #5
one intake is like a 11 inches and one is 13 inches across or mybe 13 and 15 something like that.
 

69stang351

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
191
0
0
Spokane, WA
Feb 21, 2004
#6
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #6
also isnt the firing order different?? just guessing here, but i think this is true...
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Feb 21, 2004
#7
  • Feb 21, 2004
  • #7
Depends on the cam.
 

67coupe351w

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
424
0
0
Portland, OR
Feb 22, 2004
#8
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #8
First off, changing a cam is not going to change your firing order "Depends on the cam"...

The easiest way to tell if its a 289/302 or a 351w is to look at the front of the block. Notice the timing chain cover behind the water pump, on either the left or right side to the farthest extremity of the waterpump there is a long bolt that continues through the timing chain cover and into the block. look at the block at this point. On a 289/302 this point is flush with the deck of the block (the surface the head mounts against). On the 351w there is about an inch of material (along the direction of piston travel) until you get to the deck surface.

I hope that makes sense, its perfectly clear in my mind
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 22, 2004
#9
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #9
The early 351W's also have 16 intake bolts as opposed to 12 for the 289-302's. The extra bolts are right next to the end ones in all four corners.
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Feb 22, 2004
#10
  • Feb 22, 2004
  • #10
check this out:

http://www.wrljet.com/fordv8/small.html

The firing order depends on the cam. There is much better after market availability of cams with firing order of 289 or 302 (not HO), so it may or may not have the original firing order.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Feb 23, 2004
#11
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #11
67coupe351w said:
First off, changing a cam is not going to change your firing order "Depends on the cam"...
Click to expand...
yes, it does.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Feb 23, 2004
#12
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #12
Not only the cam but the crank will change firing order right? It seems that the pistons would need to be in the right place at the right time no? Or was the firing order change so slight that they both used the same crank?

I have to put one more sentence in here so I have one that is not a question. Or do I?
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 23, 2004
#13
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #13
67coupe351w said:
First off, changing a cam is not going to change your firing order "Depends on the cam"...
Click to expand...

Second off, um, yeah it most certainly can. So.........would this be your first mustang?
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 23, 2004
#14
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #14
Edbert said:
Not only the cam but the crank will change firing order right?
Click to expand...
No, the crank does not change in this case.
The reason Ford changed the firing order was to spread out the stress on the crank. The original SBF order had one journal taking a beating. I don't have the specifics in my head right now, but that is the jist of it.
By camming the engine so that one of the power strokes on this journal would now be an exhaust stroke, it balanced the force applied to the crank and supposedly added durability/longevity.
FWIW, next SBF I build will use a 351 firing order along with good rod bolts and main studs. This will make for a nearly bulletproof bottom end for a street engine with it's tiny 3" stroke. IMHO
Dave
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 23, 2004
#15
  • Feb 23, 2004
  • #15
It wasn't one journal taking a beating, it was two; the 2/6 journal and the 3/7 one. But now that I think about it, those same journals still get hammered with the different order, just in reverse order.
 

67coupe351w

New Member
Jan 31, 2004
424
0
0
Portland, OR
Feb 24, 2004
#16
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #16
Pakrat said:
Second off, um, yeah it most certainly can. So.........would this be your first mustang?
Click to expand...

Oh looky me im so cool. Pakrat yur an as$. I knew a 289/302 cam would fit in the block but Id never had guessed it would be compatible with the crank.

But seriously, thats really interesting.
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 24, 2004
#17
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #17
You come in with an affirmative "First off let me correct you all as I know exactly what I am talking about statement" but I'm the a$$??????? Too funny. At least I'm not a dumba$$ then. If you hadn't sounded so snippy in your jerk tone like there was no way you were wrong I would likely have said nothing, and I point out that at least I ended it with a friendly tongue sticking out unlike yourself. Just because you're mad at yourself for f**king up and getting called on it, don't blame it on me.

You should seriously either consider being sure before you speak from now on or at least learn to take a frickin' joke and friendly kidding for pete's sake.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 24, 2004
#18
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #18
pak your such an a$$, and you know it, don't try to deny it, you know what they say denial is the first sign
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 25, 2004
#19
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #19
Hey 2cents from a nickel, what a surpirse.

Look, I've worked very hard for several years at being a dick, and not you or anyone is going to demote me back to a$$, got it? :damnit:

 

68stang351

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
850
9
39
Savoy TX
Feb 25, 2004
#20
  • Feb 25, 2004
  • #20
Pakrat said:
Hey 2cents from a nickel, what a surpirse.

Look, I've worked very hard for several years at being a dick, and not you or anyone is going to demote me back to a$$, got it? :damnit:

Click to expand...



I'm still in the lowly ranks of "butthole", but I'm working on a promotion.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
289 to 302 Engine
  • Fri Guy
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
678
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 13, 2025
Fri Guy
F
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
331
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
D
Brakes 1966 Mustang convertible 289, Auto - Disc brake conversion issues
  • DRGunn427
  • Feb 26, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
687
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 23, 2026
All Stock93
T
What's it Worth? 1970 Mach 1 Q code value
  • tkinak428
  • Apr 13, 2025
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
864
What is it Worth?!?!? Apr 13, 2025
horse sence
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
507
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Thursday at 5:49 PM
85GT4V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?