• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

HP Rating / Dyno

  • Thread starter Thread starter MACH1MUSTANG
  • Start date Start date Feb 9, 2007
M

MACH1MUSTANG

New Member
Aug 9, 2005
28
0
0
Missouri
Feb 9, 2007
#1
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #1
I have the 1969 351W 2V, that is the one with a HP rating of 250. Is that 250 at the rear wheels or the fly wheel? The original set up was a C-4 trans. and 3:00 gears. It now has a C-6 trans. and 3:73 gears. The questions is, does the C-6 hold back more HP to the rear wheels than a C-4? If so, about how much? I'm seeing poor number on the dyno, only 235 HP.
 

Decurion

Member
Sep 28, 2006
353
0
16
Livonia, MI
Feb 9, 2007
#2
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #2
If youre actually getting 325 at the wheels with a c6, youre doing pretty good. I think the drivetrain will typically soak up in the neighborhood of 20% of the power at the flywheel. The original numbers were flywheel, gross if I remember right, which doesnt take into account a number of factors that a real car has, but an engine in a dyno cell doesnt.
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Feb 9, 2007
#3
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #3
yup thats flywheel power. and i dont think they even put on all the accessories on the engine to make it drop down even more. my c code had a 200 hp rating. my dyno results with mods are in my sig. its actually really sad lol
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Feb 9, 2007
#4
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #4
Yeah 250 would be at the flywheel with no accessories with ideal conditions. Yes the C6 does rob more power than the C4. I am not sure exactly how much there is said to be a difference. In general expect about a 20% and sometimes as high as 30% loss in power for an automatic tranny. Looks like its time for you to change intakes and carb.
Kevin
 

ratio411

Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
3,870
73
109
Pensacola FL
Feb 9, 2007
#5
  • Feb 9, 2007
  • #5
The drivetrain loss is about 20-22% with a C4.
I don't know about the C6, except that it soaks up quite a bit more power.
I have heard, don't know the accuracy, that if you change from C4 to C6, you will lose about 35 rwhp on the dyno. With no other changes of course.

Also have to look at weight...
100 lbs is equal to 10 rwhp or .10 sec in the quarter.
So once you start driving, you not only have the extra parasitic loss of the C6, but you have the equivalent of another 1 rwhp per 10 lbs of weight added by using the larger tranny.

250 fwhp with 20% parasitic loss, gives you 200 rwhp.
That said, I believe that Ford had a habit of underrating their engines in the late 60s-early 70s. Even the smaller V8s.
If they were going to get Uncle Sam and the insurance companies to believe the 428 SCJ only made 335 fwhp, then they couldn't rate the 351w 2v at 300 fwhp!
Dave
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Ford 460 swap
  • Ford460
  • Sep 13, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
417
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 14, 2026
Ford460
F
S
Fox Another try for the European guy to get his first Fox
  • Schargedfox
  • Aug 3, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 4, 2026
DadLife0724
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
295
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
439
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
560
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?