• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

I am dynoing tomorrow! ..Vote on my rwhp.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Jul 14, 2008

Pokageek's rwhp #'s

  • Serious Pain. Get out the crack pipe. I quit. Less than 350rwhp.

    Votes: 2 6.1%
  • Painful. I am going to get drunk and sell it. 350 to 375rwhp.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • What the Hell is wrong with this POS car. 375+ to 400rwhp.

    Votes: 7 21.2%
  • Ok, I feel a tad better... 400+ to 425rwhp.

    Votes: 20 60.6%
  • I am going to break out the champagne. 425+rwhp

    Votes: 4 12.1%

  • Total voters
    33
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 18, 2008
#41
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #41
Ok. I'll bite..what exhaust should I have? mid length and 3" catback? Are acufab mid-length ok?
 

D-Phresh

New Member
Jul 16, 2008
2
0
0
st.pete.FL
Jul 18, 2008
#42
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #42
:damnit:Man that sucks but hey good things come to those who wait well so they tell me
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
www.angelfire.com
Jul 18, 2008
#43
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #43
I'm surprised you are running such a small header and exhaust. I'd think 1-3/4 would be the MINIMUM size primary you would want. I will have dyno numbers soon of what a 1-3/4" primary does on my car, but if it doesn't pick up 10-15rwhp I'm going to be mad.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 18, 2008
#44
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #44
I cant find anyone to tell me if 17/8 will fit let alone 1 3/4...I would like to go LT 1 7/8 - to 3.5 collector. Unless mid-legnth is just as good.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 18, 2008
#45
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #45
I'd be looking at 1 7/8 LONGtube and a 3" exhaust. Ask Ed @ FTI what you need since he designed the cam. Have him get you the correct valve springs as well. I use 1 3/4" on my little 347 streeter.
 

str8stang036

New Member
Dec 28, 2002
1,382
0
0
Miami
Jul 18, 2008
#46
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #46
What is the reason you were not able to get the car tuned in one day? Hopefully the shop is not running your car at that out of state event.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jul 18, 2008
#47
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #47
Yep, I am with Paul.

I would run a 1.875" o.d. diameter exhaust and I personally would have went with large heads, i.e., AFR 225 cc.

Per cubic inch, a 302 stroker will make more than a 351 stroker. Some forget this...

Many stangers are not realistic and tend to give you 100% + VE power numbers.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 18, 2008
#48
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #48
"Per cubic inch, a 302 stroker will make more than a 351 stroker. Some forget this..."
Why?

I dont think they are driving it. They better not be.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
49
MAINE
Jul 18, 2008
#49
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #49
Are you getting a tune done to or just dyno numbers? Either way it should not take more then a few hrs. Dont know why they need it for so long
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Jul 18, 2008
#50
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #50
I would be worried especially if your car was supposed to be done and all of a sudden they are out of town with no phone call to let you know that their gone. If they were going to keep it longer wouldn't they have told you that they were going to an out of state event? That seems pretty shady to me..
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
www.angelfire.com
Jul 18, 2008
#51
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #51
I know where your car is and I bet they are in Joliet IL for the NMRA/NMCA race this weekend. Two of the guys from there run renegade. I know the tuner there pretty well and I'd trust him with my car. That is kind of ****ty though that they didn't notify you that they'd be gone.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 18, 2008
#52
  • Jul 18, 2008
  • #52
Yea. Next time they should leave a recorded message at least that they are going to be out of town.

To answer your questions, I am having it dyno-tuned meaning both. For example, thanks to Grady I asked that they tune it for 42# inj in the start up tables so it dont flood ..you know - stuff like that..remove ALL limiters including the speed, revv and timing cut that ford likes to kick in when you reach 100mph.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 19, 2008
#53
  • Jul 19, 2008
  • #53
............zzzzzzzzzzzzz..............
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Jul 21, 2008
#54
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #54
Happy Monday!
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
49
MAINE
Jul 21, 2008
#55
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #55
Today is the big day
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
44
ohio
Jul 21, 2008
#56
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #56
:worthlesa without numbers!

Good luck!
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 21, 2008
#57
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #57
And now the numbers...that we've all been waiting for............................................................................Drums please....



























400rwhp on the button and 432rwtq (with the poopy headers)! Thanks SGS! I am satisfied for a while. With the long tubes and some port matching..and coupla other items..they know I can get more. I am stopping here for now. Any guesses on the Long-tube output?
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Jul 21, 2008
#58
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #58
alright!! 400hp I was thinking around 1hp per ci which was close.


You should see some pretty big gains with atleast 1 3/4 longtubes and 3" exhaust.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jul 21, 2008
#59
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #59
Thanks man. BTW that means the difference between the professional products upper and lower and pro-comp heads vs Rick's from (RNH Performance) recommended edelbrock Victor Intake and AFR 205's was worth 70 rwhp! The TQ was nearly there all along. So grn, I know you meant well but looks like you were off on your guess. But I agree I am leaving some on the table but that's just for now.

p.s. SGS didn't think the mid-length headers do much . They said go long-tube or go home.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Jul 21, 2008
#60
  • Jul 21, 2008
  • #60
I was pretty close. I didn't want to throw out high numbers like some guys to gas your head up and have you bummed. 400hp is a good start considering the exhaust and possible wrong springs for the FTI cam. I would guess 30-40hp with the right exhaust (probably 1 7/8" longtube and full 3" system) Once 400hp gets boring, you can upgrade the exhaust.

If this was the price is right I would have won, everyone else over guessed
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
439
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
300
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
1
Fox Looking for a digital counsel clock for my 1979 Mercury Capri
  • 1979CapriRS
  • Nov 26, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
224
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 8, 2024
qikgts
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
217
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
M
Hello all, I am new to this forum
  • Maddog 302
  • Dec 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
233
The Welcome Wagon Dec 20, 2025
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?