• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Ignition Control Module

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1990lx5oh
  • Start date Start date Sep 16, 2008

1990lx5oh

New Member
Aug 10, 2007
26
0
0
Weaverville, NC
Sep 16, 2008
#1
  • Sep 16, 2008
  • #1
Is there a major difference between a regular "OE replacement" module and the "hi perf" version from accel? or is the only difference a lilltle bit longer dwell time? The only solid thing that i read about it is that its more reliable, but the one that just went out was 18 years old...how much more reliable do you really need?
 

skunk21

Active Member
May 22, 2007
1,203
3
36
Taxachusetts
Sep 16, 2008
#2
  • Sep 16, 2008
  • #2
I would just stay with stock, at one time I thought about getting another one myself and even upgrading the ignition system itself but after searching and talking with some peeps on here the stock system is just fine and pretty much the other stuff is money wasted. unless others disagree I think stock is fine.
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Sep 17, 2008
#3
  • Sep 17, 2008
  • #3
if you have a stock dizzy, i wouldnt even bother wasting your money. just get a 'stock' one.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Sep 17, 2008
#4
  • Sep 17, 2008
  • #4
I agree. OEM is tough to beat.

We don't really need additional dwell. The stock ignition has been dyno shown to hold up to nearly 400 hp NA.

I'd almost rather use a multiple spark box to achieve more spark energy and duration anyhow.
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Sep 17, 2008
#5
  • Sep 17, 2008
  • #5
Believe it or not, DYNO MOD TFI's from perf dist and accel TFI's are cheaper than Motorcraft TFI's. But i would probably go with Motorcraft, Just because of longevity.
Ant
 

1990lx5oh

New Member
Aug 10, 2007
26
0
0
Weaverville, NC
Sep 17, 2008
#6
  • Sep 17, 2008
  • #6
thanks for the input, and saving me some cash...i couldnt figure out how they could say it was more reliable then oe, when my oe lasted 18 years!! i guess that one would last 19....but thanks again, can always count on you guys for great info!!!:SNSign:
 

monte87

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
876
18
49
new york
Sep 18, 2008
#7
  • Sep 18, 2008
  • #7
U bet bud, Gotta love stangnet!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Help with a 95 5L crank no start
  • TheBubbaJoe
  • Nov 4, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
392
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 5, 2025
AeroCoupe
G
Fox 1993 2.3 Aftermarket Relay Control Module (CCRM) contains more relays than original.
  • greentee12
  • Jan 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
378
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 8, 2025
dcm0123
D
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
557
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
798
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
503
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?