• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

ignition output voltage vs. spark energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter virgostang94
  • Start date Start date Sep 3, 2004

What do you believe to be a better ignition? Crane or MSD???

  • MSD Digital-6

    Votes: 4 100.0%
  • Crane HI-6R

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    4
  • Poll closed Sep 18, 2004.
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 3, 2004
#1
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #1
What aspect of aftermarket ignition's should you be more concerned with the ignitions output voltage or the spark energy measured in millijoules when coupled with the coil???
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 3, 2004
#2
  • Sep 3, 2004
  • #2
msd vs. crane ignition

The MSD digital-6 ignition claims 535V power and 135 millijoules of spark out-put. Crane Cams Hi-6R claims 450v power and 1,200 millijoules of spark out-put. What is more important spark voltage or current so to speak.

-Steve-
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 4, 2004
#3
  • Sep 4, 2004
  • #3
millijoules is the better measure - it relates to the total heat released in the spark.
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#4
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #4
I'm convinced that current is more important than voltage because you can have 10 million volts at the tip of the spark plug but it isn't going to jump across that spark gap with out current. Therefore I would rather buy the ignition that has more millijoule output than voltage.
 

stang_gt_1994

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2002
2,723
0
0
Powder Springs, GA (30 min. from Atlanta)
Sep 8, 2004
#5
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #5
After high voltage is created in the coil your not going to have many amps anyway, like 0.00175A with a 8000 ohm secondary reading.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 8, 2004
#6
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #6
In a spark gap system like a car ignition and spark plug, the voltage developed is self limiting. The voltage rises when the coil fires to the point where the air between the electrode and the ground strap on the plug is overstressed and the air/fuel ionizes until the voltage jumps the gap. At that point the voltage (like water pressure) has been building up, but once the plug fires, the voltage "potential" (pressure) is turned into current and the voltage drops as current rises.
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#7
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #7
You got your milliamps wrong...

175 milliamps equals .175amps.
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#8
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #8
ohms laws says: current is proportional to voltage. I=current, E=voltage, R=resistence. If "E" is equal to "I" times "R" Then if voltage increases then current either current or resistence had to have increases. Resistence is set. it doesn't change whatsoever. SO THE BIG QUESTION IS "WHAT IS BETTER HAVING MORE VOLTAGE OR MILLIJOULES OUT OF THE IGNITION???
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#9
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #9
Electronics Technician in the house... What about you.
 

squall9393

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
534
0
0
Oceanside, CA
Sep 8, 2004
#10
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #10
tmoss said:
millijoules is the better measure - it relates to the total heat released in the spark.
Click to expand...
I second that. You want a hotter spark to burn the mixture. Voltage is "electromotive force" that causes the current to overcome the sparkplug gap. the voltage is gonna be stepped-up by the ignition coil anyhow so when your in the 5 digit range of voltage I would think one is as good as the other. If I take a rock and throw it over a gap in the road and then take one and throw it with harder force- yes, it will get there faster. Same with increased force (voltage)- it will overcome the restistance of air in the gap of the sparkplug electrode more efficiently. All this can be compensated as well by shortening the spark gap if you want a smaller gap to overcome and a hotter spark. My 2 pennies.
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#11
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #11
I work around high voltage and also high current electronics. I've seen idiots get shocked way more doing stupid things around high current electronics.
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#12
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #12
Hard facts finally.

After a little while searching the web I came across this site with dyno proven numbers. and It's just what I expected.

http://www.4wheeloffroad.com/techarticles/53778/index2.html
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#13
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #13
millijoules per spark in each 20 degree crank rotation.

So If crane cams says their hi-6r ignition puts our 1200 millijoules and msd's digital-6 say's their ignition puts out 135 millijoules per spark. is crane cams advertising the total millijoules added together in their total spark duration??? Meaning crane cams hi-6r ignition puts out a max or 12 sparks in one 20 degree crank rotation for spark up to 3000rpm's equaling 100millijoules per spark???
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#14
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #14
vote in the poll for the better ignition module.

CRANE VS. MSD

HI-6R VS. DIGITAL-6
 
V

virgostang94

New Member
Mar 12, 2004
20
0
0
Norfolk, VA
Sep 8, 2004
#15
  • Sep 8, 2004
  • #15
-test signature-
 

squall9393

New Member
Feb 7, 2004
534
0
0
Oceanside, CA
Sep 9, 2004
#16
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #16
Holy cow virgostang94. That was like 5 posts back-to-back. So what's up yo come to conclusion yet? If you want, start a poll thread MSD vs. Crane. BTW you stole wytstang's avatar. He has the same one. Got confused there for a sec on who's who.

JJ
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Sep 9, 2004
#17
  • Sep 9, 2004
  • #17
Mallory HyFireVI series is a good choice too from what I have read.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Help with initial Microsquirt ignition setting
  • germain101
  • Nov 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
554
Digital Self-tuning Forum Nov 15, 2025
Mustang5L5
8
Did I fry something messing with my ignition?
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
8
Electrical Crank-no start ... no spark ... no injector pulse, was it something I did? (redux)
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
534
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
R
1994 GT 5.0L crank no start
  • Red1994MustangGT
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Aug 19, 2025
Kurt_MO
K
SURGING IDLE / NO IDLE CHECKLIST FOR 1999–2004 MUSTANG GT (4.6L 2V) - Work In Progress
  • Noobz347
  • Aug 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
865
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?