• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

improving performance through rear end ratio

  • Thread starter Thread starter showtime56
  • Start date Start date Jan 23, 2022
S

showtime56

Member
Jan 23, 2022
3
1
13
Bridgecreek okla
Jan 23, 2022
#1
  • Jan 23, 2022
  • #1
I am new to the forum and not for sure how to post a question. Here is my dilemma.. I have a 56 ford customline show car with an almost stock 390 fe. the only thing not stock is dual carbs and high performance coil and dist. setup.. I am going to get carbs adjusted to run right. They are way to rich at this time but can be calibrated down. I can not add anymore hp because there is no room to add headers (have had it looked at by pro custom people). Did 250 hp on dyno (17 inch wheels on rear) and a 325 rear end ratio positrac with 4 speed shifter. Not for sure how much power loss due to the dual carb set up but am looking at how to increase performance on zero to 60 and eight mile runs. At 65 mph in 4th I am tacking 2400 rpm and it will only do 4400 rpm. ( that's borderline to much) If I go to a 6 speed manual shifter and change rear end gears to a 370, will the 6 speed (.63 in 6th compared to 1 to 1 presently in 4th) get me down the road quicker with out hurting my top end or cruising speed?? there are no power adds possible at all because of the header situation.
 

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jan 24, 2022
#2
  • Jan 24, 2022
  • #2
What 6 speed transmission? What 1st and 2nd gear ratios? Lets assume a 1st gear of 2.96. With a rear end ratio of 3.70 * 2.96= 10.952. A ratio like that means you are going to run out of 1st gear fairly quickly...that isn't a big deal for a SBF that revs to 6000RPM, but its a much bigger deal if you only have 4400 RPM to work with. You will end up with something that is worthless after about 30 feet. A 6 speed is just going to make you shift more and slow you down...especially with a 390 paired with a 3.70 rear end ratio. A T4 or a C6 would be more appropriate with that rear end gearing.

I don't believe for a second that there isn't room to add headers, as an example, I built headers for my engine and only had this much room to work with:



Most times shops just don't want to take on tight clearances when building headers, too many issues that come with it.


That being said, there are other ways to add power...such as turbocharging...or keep it simple and run a reasonably sized shot of nitrous. 250HP(Call it 285 to the wheels) isn't a whole lot of power to work with...a small block could easily make that and have a lot more room to work with for things like headers as well as being able to rev a lot higher and take advantage of lower gearing better.
 

manicmechanic007

5 Year Member
Sep 26, 2017
2,526
710
143
Roy, Utah
Jan 25, 2022
#3
  • Jan 25, 2022
  • #3
Internal engine mods will be your best bet for a performance upgrade
Make it a 428 and tell them it's a 352 or stock 390
Dual carbs is a bit too much for a stock 390 IMHO (yours 10,5:1 and 315 HP)
I agree that headers can be made for the vehicle
I have a 56 too with a 429 in it and Headers are next.
I agree there is not much room. I am going with custom made fenderwell exit headers
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Jan 25, 2022
#4
  • Jan 25, 2022
  • #4
I think we're missing something here, the OP knows it's running like crap but is going to ignore that and swap trans and Diff. I think you need to fix the engine issue before you start throwing cash at the rest of the car.
 
Reactions: 2Blue2

wicked93gs

15 Year Member
Sep 30, 2006
1,198
228
93
Nashville TN
Jan 28, 2022
#5
  • Jan 28, 2022
  • #5
WORTH said:
I think we're missing something here, the OP knows it's running like crap but is going to ignore that and swap trans and Diff. I think you need to fix the engine issue before you start throwing cash at the rest of the car.
Click to expand...
Agreed. Fixing the engine is #1. A pretty common mistake is too much carb for the engine. Assuming the carbs are reasonably sized and you just have them for the cool factor(no judgement here, I do after all have individual throttle bodies and while potential is good, setup on multiple throttle plate and linkage systems is always a pain), they still need to be correctly synched up or you are just going to be chasing your tail
 
S

showtime56

Member
Jan 23, 2022
3
1
13
Bridgecreek okla
Feb 28, 2022
#6
  • Feb 28, 2022
  • #6
I just am finishing putting a Tremec 5 speed in (287 - .68) this gets me a lower 1,2, and 3rd gear while solving my cruising problem (previously 2450 rpm @ 70 mph). ordered an Edelbrock "Multiport injection" system. This should free up a lot of horsepower! I took it down to performance shop to jet carbs down and discovered it was running non 1 degree of timing... they jetted it down which fixed most of the "too rich issue" and found that it ran a whole lot better at 10 degrees (they said at least another 50 hp and 700 rpm gain) but wont start once warm without having it to sit for 5 minutes. The best right now is timing set at 5 degrees where it will start warm. The Edelbrock comes with a handheld tuner and will allow the timing to be set at 12 degrees on full throttle but at startup and idle 5 degrees. So I am hoping to see a gain of 50 to 65 more hp thru the timing and good fuel system. when done, I will probably spent $8000 for good gearing and fuel delivery (OUCH). On the header issue, I have added the pics. notice the poer brake setup is a half inch above the valve covers so raisiing up motor to put hearers on dont work. Car was built to show, not for hp...
 

Attachments

  • 20220106_170112.webp
    187.2 KB · Views: 150
  • 20220106_170134.webp
    267.5 KB · Views: 156
  • 20220106_170309.webp
    326.2 KB · Views: 155
  • 20220106_170428.webp
    248 KB · Views: 160
  • 20220106_170512.webp
    247.4 KB · Views: 149
Reactions: jikelly
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
684
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Progress Thread Giving an abandoned 88 GT project a new chance at life
  • jaketractor
  • Jan 9, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 20, 2025
Noobz347
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?