SVTdriver
Founding Member
I know that steel is cheaper than aluminum. You don't have tobe an engineer to know that. But the platform is only based on the LS. So cost could have been making the aluminum fit to the new mustang chassis.
SVTdriver said:I know that steel is cheaper than aluminum. You don't have tobe an engineer to know that. But the platform is only based on the LS. So cost could have been making the aluminum fit to the new mustang chassis.
SVTdriver said:I think your misunderstanding what I'm saying. Or maybe I'm not understanding you. Since the chassis is not the exact same as the lincoln. The cost could have been in making any suspension aluminum or steel fit in.
SportscarFan said:AMEN, From Ames, IA.
Add a Limited Slip, and ford would have a deal, maybe in a year or two.
My wife's miata with 4 snow tires, IRS, Torsen Limited slip, and a 5 speed was comparable in the snow to my old 93 Probe GT with FWD, 5-speed, and 225/45-R16 All-season tires. A little common sense on the road in the snow, and the little sportscar will do OK. My 88 Mustang (before the Probe GT) with an automatic was a basketcase.
My 2000 Ranger 4x4 is now (replaced the probe) the true blizzard warrior, though. Drove from Des Moines to Ames at 3am through more than 8 inches of falling new snow on the interstate, last february, no plows on the road. She's a keeper, but no performance car.
shatner saves said:I'm not having much of a problem right now.
205/65/15 Blizzak tires - $85 per (2 on the back)
15x7 alloys - ($30 per at the scrap yard I got them from)
stock limited slip.
The only weight I have in the back are my 2 summer tires/wheels, and I removed the doughnut spare. Make sure you don't let the fuel level get below half a tank and that's all the weight you'll need. That, and, don't drive like an ass.
Mind you, my solid axle/Eibach spring combo means a first gear crawl over the ice ruts.
SportscarFan said:Glad to hear that it is going well for you. I wish the miata had blizzaks, it has el-cheapo snows on el-cheapo steel wheels and hubcaps. (looks bad, but it was cheap, and I was unemployed at the time.)
My old 88 LX Mustang was the car I drove in college (And looked quite a lot like yours, BTW. Good looking car!), and it had wider than stock all season Firestone Firehawks on it, and it was terrible, but couldn't afford or store dedicated snow tires. The Probe GT had 225/55 - r16 all season Cooper Cobras on it. it was ok, but the tires were just too wide, and would skate over most things, rather than bite in.
The Miata on cheap snows does about as well, if not slightly better on it's narrow (195/55) snows with limited slip, and good contact patch control from the IRS. That is with NO weight (added or otherwise ), other than at least half a tank of gas, and someone in the driver's seat.
I can't really fit a full sized wheel and tire, or a sandbag in the miata's trunk, and still be able to fit a birthday card in there besides.
Downside is that it handles badly on those cheap balloons in the dry.
The thing is, now I am going to have to get new Bridgestone Dueler AT Revos for my Ranger 4x4, then a new set of summer tires, probably Bridgestone Potenza RE750s, for the 16" summer wheels on the Miata, before I can get some 15" aluminum take-offs from a wrecker, and a set of blizzaks for the miata's winter shoes. I gues I am going to be helping supporting the tire industry for the next 18 months or so.
(&) said:Virtually everyone (except Mustang and truck drivers) already does. So believe it.
(&) said:Where do you live? The roads here suck ass, and complaining to the Board of Supervisors isn't going to change that. Might as well adapt to the situation.
(&) said:It's not hard to make a live axle ride well, and it's not hard to make a live axle handle. But it's damn near impossible to have both, and I want both.
(&) said:I'm hardly ever at the front at a stop light, and when I am I'm usually in the city and tend to take it easy. And the on ramps I use have pretty sharp turns. So pretty much any time I'm doing any spirited driving, I'm not going in a straight line. Don't get me wrong, I like power, but on an average day, the pedal does not reach the floor, but I do tend to turn the steering wheel...several times, in fact!
(&) said:Then can you explain why 99% of cars on the road have IRS?
(&) said:RWD was NEVER considered primitive with performance enthusiasts. And trust me, IRS is not going away, because a solid axle is only good at one thing, and IRS is good at many.
CuddaWuddaShuda said:IRS is probably not going away. Neither are power windows, in-car DVDs, etc. Manufacturers like to make over-accessorized, expensive cars.
SVTdriver said:But the biggest fallacy of all. Is that the mustang needs it.
Mach460 said:But the IRS would have made the car better.
Mach460 said:You're right..it doesn't need it. But heck. it's doesn't need a 3 vavlve SOHC engine with VVT to make 300 hp, the Mach 1 DOHC would have done the job just as well.
But the IRS would have made the car better.
SVTdriver said:Your right it didn't need the 3 valve. But I'd rather have the aluminum block 3 valve than an iron block mach engine. Since the weight will effect more than just handling.
Answer me this one thing. Would IRS as stock equipment make the Mustang more expensive than it would be now that it's not?Mach460 said:IRS...an accesory.....oook, there are million of over accesorized cars out there then.
I just don't understand all this hostility towards IRS. It will make the car better...what's so evil about that?
And don't tell me cost either...because that's the biggest fallacy being thrown around here.