• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Is a 4" CAI overkill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mob
  • Start date Start date Mar 6, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mob

the guy who hits on his mom
20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 3, 2003
2,566
136
104
Dallas, TX
Mar 9, 2009
#21
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #21
I ordered the 3.5" today, should get here in a couple days.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Mar 9, 2009
#22
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #22
Now that i'm thinking about this....does anyone know what the cfm rating would be on a 65-70mm throttle body? I'm curious what size carb flow that would equate to. Another thing i was thinking about was how a lot of Ford's show cars have duel CAI and duel throttle body setups...i wonder why?
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 9, 2009
#23
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #23
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Well, needed or not...consider this...

The carbed cars have a duel "CAI" with the duel snorkel air cleaner setup. The tubes that are in the fenders are between 3.5 and 4 inches, and there are two of them. I know this is a sort of apples to oranges comparison, but like you said it's also not gonna hurt either. I would say that too much throttle body is going to hurt worse. We could go into intake air velocity, but that's really only an issue after the air passes the throttle body since that's what is controlling the intake of air. As long as it's a smooth intake track and free of kinks and rough places that would cause turbulance, i'd think that 3 or 3.5 is plenty. But, i also know Rick Anderson knows his stuff and he wouldn't sell a 4 inch if it didn't work for somebody.
Click to expand...

A large throttle body does not hurt low-end power.

It is just a valve that lets air in the engine. This is the same reason why a 4.00" pipe will not hurt.

Either way you attack it, just keep the intake tubing size area consistent (tube, MAF, TB).
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Mar 9, 2009
#24
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #24
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
Now that i'm thinking about this....does anyone know what the cfm rating would be on a 65-70mm throttle body? I'm curious what size carb flow that would equate to. Another thing i was thinking about was how a lot of Ford's show cars have duel CAI and duel throttle body setups...i wonder why?
Click to expand...

Throttle Body CFM Flow Ratings for the 5.0L:

Stock 5.0L 60 MM - 526 CFM
SVO 65 MM - 540 CFM

Accufab:

65 MM - 664 CFM
70 MM - 787 CFM
70 MM - 896 CFM (Race version)
75 MM - 924 CFM
75 MM - 1045 CFM (Race version)
80 MM - 1142 CFM
85 MM - 1322 CFM
90 MM - 1369 CFM
105 MM - 1550 CFM

Holley:

65 MM - 750 CFM*
70 MM - 790 CFM*
75 MM - 840 CFM*
80 MM - 892 CFM*

*Information given by Tech Rep.

BBK:

70 MM - 726 CFM

Dual throttle body set-ups are for packaging reasons and it is also a bit easier to control (think throttle modulation) two small blades, than one big blade.

Throttle Body Blade Area:

One can figure out the area by a simple formula. Take the millimeter measurement and divide by 25.4 to get the inches across at the blade. Take that number and use it to find the area of the blade. We will use the area of a circle, which is roughly the shape of the throttle body blade and will give a good estimate.

The area of a circle is PI x radius x radius. The radius is half of the diameter of the blade or circle.

Example: 60 mm/25.4 = 2.36. 2.36/2 = 1.18. Then 3.14 x 1.18 x 1.18 = 4.38” (squared).

58 mm - 4.09”
60 mm - 4.38”
65 mm - 5.14”
70 mm - 5.96”
75 mm - 6.84”
80 mm - 7.79”
85 mm - 8.79”
90 mm - 9.86”
95 mm - 10.98”
105 mm - 13.41”

The twin throttle bodies are a little different. You need to add the areas together of each individual blade, so the areas are:

57 mm - 7.90”
62 mm - 9.36”
65 mm – 10.28”

NASCAR is in the 125% VE with 358 cubic inches. They also run 750-830 CFM carburetors. Could they make more power with a larger carburetor? Very possible, but it shows you that the restriction is small, considering they are making near the 850 HP mark.
 

TweekedGT

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
1,274
0
0
Alberta
Mar 9, 2009
#25
  • Mar 9, 2009
  • #25
I have my own custom 4" on the 408. Flows awesome.
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 10, 2009
#26
  • Mar 10, 2009
  • #26
the way i see it is that you want to get as much air into the engine as possible, people told me that a 90mm tb and 4" powerpipe was overkill and i would loose all my low end with the big pipe and too much cylinder head... Well if you look at my dyno sheets you can see that im giving up no TQ. down low, and the motor feels pretty f9cking snappy to me.


But for your setup i think the 3.5 pipe is the correct choice, but i dont think that if you put a 4'' pipe on the car and drove it you would notice much if any difference
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Mar 10, 2009
#27
  • Mar 10, 2009
  • #27
mine is 4 1/4" works great! plus works as ram air!


serious tho




and my buddies 3 1/2"



peace











john
 

90lxcoupe

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 7, 2003
3,596
350
134
Mar 11, 2009
#28
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #28
SMOKEDYA said:
mine is 4 1/4" works great! plus works as ram air!


serious tho




and my buddies 3 1/2"



peace











john
Click to expand...

thats a good looking engine compartment... whats the rest of the combo?
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Mar 11, 2009
#29
  • Mar 11, 2009
  • #29
mine is a 351w 40 over AFR 185 58cc heads L/T's trick flow R upper/lower intake 42# injec voodo flat tappet cam MSD dizzy crane gold race rollor 1.6 rockers accufab 90 to 75MM throttle body 90 LMAF no P.S,A/C, anything else just alt and water pump. his i caint disclose but it's nice! peace


john
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
120
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
P
Air Fuel ratio bung location.
  • Praetorious
  • Feb 7, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
39
Views
890
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 11, 2026
Noobz347
Which SN95 axles for 93 LX, disc brakes, ABS rings?
  • dan50
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
381
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
757
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
860
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?