• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Is it worth it to go from 342 to 363?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stangboy
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2012
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 11, 2012
#1
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #1
Hey guys I'm about to build a Dart based stroker. I have everything to do a 342 but I'm thinging about spending the extra $500 to buy the 4.125 pistons to make it a 363. Are those extra cubes going to give me that much more hp to warrant that extra $500? I have a set of AFR 185 heads, I'll be ordering a custom cam, Holley Systemax II intake, 75mm TB, etc. I'm thinking about upgrading to AFR 205s. I'll only do the 363 if I get the 205s tho. What do you guys thing?
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 11, 2012
#2
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #2
I think you should be more concerned with the top end parts you're putting on it. Those parts you listed...

I have a set of AFR 185 heads, I'll be ordering a custom cam, Holley Systemax II intake, 75mm TB
Click to expand...

... Are 302 parts, IMHO. You would probably stand to gain more by putting money in better flowing parts than you would the extra cubic inches. I would unquestionably be ditching the 185s and going after the AFR 205s and the biggest TB you can hog out that intake to match (which is probably an 80mm). Really, the SysteMax is a good intake BUT I would be considering an intake that can handle a 90mm TB, like a Trick Flow R or a Victor 5.0.

That said, if you haven't got it together yet, why not run the bigger pistons? There is no replacement for displacement. For argument's sake, let's say you make the exact same specific horsepower (hp/ci) out of each engine. Let's say you make 425 HP out of the 342 (1.24 hp/ci). That equates to 451 hp out of the 363.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 11, 2012
#3
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #3
NIKwoaC said:
I think you should be more concerned with the top end parts you're putting on it. Those parts you listed...



... Are 302 parts, IMHO. You would probably stand to gain more by putting money in better flowing parts than you would the extra cubic inches. I would unquestionably be ditching the 185s and going after the AFR 205s and the biggest TB you can hog out that intake to match (which is probably an 80mm). Really, the SysteMax is a good intake BUT I would be considering an intake that can handle a 90mm TB, like a Trick Flow R or a Victor 5.0.

That said, if you haven't got it together yet, why not run the bigger pistons? There is no replacement for displacement. For argument's sake, let's say you make the exact same specific horsepower (hp/ci) out of each engine. Let's say you make 425 HP out of the 342 (1.24 hp/ci). That equates to 451 hp out of the 363.
Click to expand...

While I agree w/ Nik on the old adage of no replacement for displacement,..if you bore that block to 4.125, AND if a cylinder wall is ever damaged by a (take your pick) broken ring, ring land, piston pin, connecting rod, etc. the "replacement" you'll end up dealing with is the entire block, as opposed to having to reserve capability to over bore it for that calamity should it ever arise. (or you'll have to have that cylinder sleeved). Boring it to capacity will make it more costly to repair, and given the smallish cylinder heads you currently have, will probably not warrant spending the money for the 363.

Lastly, I'm sure that a dart block has ample wall thickness to support the 4.125 bore, but I'm wondering if the engine will run hotter as a result.
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 11, 2012
#4
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #4
I don't think I'll have any cooling issues due to the bore size. I'm sure Dart thought of that when they designed their blocks....well, I hope they did. I really want to get the 205s but my budget won't allow me to get too many other parts like another intake and TB. I already have most of the parts for this motor. I will have to refinance a loan I have to get the money to get the heads and pistons.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Apr 11, 2012
#5
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #5
You can always change the induction later. Those parts are pretty hot so they will sell rather quickly. I went with Holley Intake, 70MM TB, Pro-M 80MM on my 347 stroker with 185 Heads. It was very quick and the motor was toquey. I went with a huge exhaust system 1-3/4" Long Tubes, 3" Prochamber, 3" Cat Back which helped.

If I were to do it again, 363 from Woody @ Fordstrokers and 205 heads with more aggressive induction if kept N/A.
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 11, 2012
#6
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #6
I was about to by a shortblock from Woody but a friend of mine gave me a HELL OF A DEAL on this Dart Sportsman 8.2 block, Scat 342 forged rotating assembly, billet steel flywheel and SFI balancer(everything still brand new in the boxes). So, I'm getting all the machining and assembly done locally. This motor will be mostly driven in N/A trim but I do plan to spray at least a 150hp shot occasionally depending on how much power it makes N/A.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 11, 2012
#7
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #7
madmike1157 said:
While I agree w/ Nik on the old adage of no replacement for displacement,..if you bore that block to 4.125, AND if a cylinder wall is ever damaged by a (take your pick) broken ring, ring land, piston pin, connecting rod, etc. the "replacement" you'll end up dealing with is the entire block, as opposed to having to reserve capability to over bore it for that calamity should it ever arise. (or you'll have to have that cylinder sleeved). Boring it to capacity will make it more costly to repair, and given the smallish cylinder heads you currently have, will probably not warrant spending the money for the 363.

Lastly, I'm sure that a dart block has ample wall thickness to support the 4.125 bore, but I'm wondering if the engine will run hotter as a result.
Click to expand...

Mike, those Dart blocks will safely go to 4.185... So if you bung up your big bore engine, you can... make it a bigger bore engine. This gives you .060 over the 4.125 big bore which honestly IS more than you can safely overbore the stock 302. Dart blocks are a thing of beauty. And I want one....
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 11, 2012
#8
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #8
SSeater said:
Mike, those Dart blocks will safely go to 4.185... So if you bung up your big bore engine, you can... make it a bigger bore engine. This gives you .060 over the 4.125 big bore which honestly IS more than you can safely overbore the stock 302. Dart blocks are a thing of beauty. And I want one....
Click to expand...
They don't make no stinkin' dart blocks for a 4.6
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 11, 2012
#9
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #9
SSeater said:
Mike, those Dart blocks will safely go to 4.185... So if you bung up your big bore engine, you can... make it a bigger bore engine. This gives you .060 over the 4.125 big bore which honestly IS more than you can safely overbore the stock 302. Dart blocks are a thing of beauty. And I want one....
Click to expand...

Ha, beat me to it. Yep, the Dart blocks can handle a ton of bore. My next short block will likely be a Dart 363.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Apr 11, 2012
#10
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #10
The AFR 205 can take advantage of the larger bore but id be looking at some other things as well. The larger bore can cause some detonation issues with the larger flame travel area amongst other things.

If the combo is right the extra cubic inches is good. Id prefer to see more then the 4.00" bore you have planned even with the AFR 185. I've sonic tested the DART, a 4.2" bore is possible. Most companies offer a 4.155" piston after that you get into custom. If you decide to change I have a set of Probe SRS pistons sitting on my shelf 4.125" bore if you can use them Ill let them go heavily discounted.
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 11, 2012
#11
  • Apr 11, 2012
  • #11
Rick 91GT said:
The AFR 205 can take advantage of the larger bore but id be looking at some other things as well. The larger bore can cause some detonation issues with the larger flame travel area amongst other things.

If the combo is right the extra cubic inches is good. Id prefer to see more then the 4.00" bore you have planned even with the AFR 185. I've sonic tested the DART, a 4.2" bore is possible. Most companies offer a 4.155" piston after that you get into custom. If you decide to change I have a set of Probe SRS pistons sitting on my shelf 4.125" bore if you can use them Ill let them go heavily discounted.
Click to expand...

I PM'ed you
 
T

turbogt

Member
May 1, 2003
723
16
19
Montana
Apr 12, 2012
#12
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #12
SSeater said:
Mike, those Dart blocks will safely go to 4.185... So if you bung up your big bore engine, you can... make it a bigger bore engine. This gives you .060 over the 4.125 big bore which honestly IS more than you can safely overbore the stock 302. Dart blocks are a thing of beauty. And I want one....
Click to expand...


This.. and the advantages of the 4.125 will mostly be gained by unshrouding the valves.. its better any way you put it.. you will still have tons of overbore room as well.

spelling errors brought to you by tapatalk
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Apr 12, 2012
#13
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #13
Rick 91GT said:
The AFR 205 can take advantage of the larger bore but id be looking at some other things as well. The larger bore can cause some detonation issues with the larger flame travel area amongst other things.

If the combo is right the extra cubic inches is good. Id prefer to see more then the 4.00" bore you have planned even with the AFR 185. I've sonic tested the DART, a 4.2" bore is possible. Most companies offer a 4.155" piston after that you get into custom. If you decide to change I have a set of Probe SRS pistons sitting on my shelf 4.125" bore if you can use them Ill let them go heavily discounted.
Click to expand...

Rick be hookin you uuuuuuup!

Rick, good point on the detonation thing.
 

Boosted92LX

It's only an inch or two. What's the big deal?
15 Year Member
Dec 19, 2010
5,721
4,244
224
Apr 12, 2012
#14
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #14
madmike1157 said:
They don't make no stinkin' dart blocks for a 4.6
Click to expand...

Well, those blocks are tough as hell anyway, unlike a 302 block.... And, due to Ford's brilliant "modular" idea of 100mm bore spacing, the holes are simply too close together to open up that far. Because of this, best way to get power out of a mod IMO is air stuffage....(Yay turbo!!)
 

hoopty5.0

mechanicus terribilis
15 Year Member
Dec 14, 2010
7,785
6,938
214
SW Houston
Apr 12, 2012
#15
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #15
SSeater said:
Because of this, best way to get power out of a mod IMO is air stuffage....(Yay turbo!!)
Click to expand...

"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink..........Until you stuff a fire hose down its' throat"
 
Reactions: srtthis

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 12, 2012
#16
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #16
turbogt said:
This.. and the advantages of the 4.125 will mostly be gained by unshrouding the valves.. its better any way you put it.. you will still have tons of overbore room as well.

spelling errors brought to you by tapatalk
Click to expand...
I've heard about unshrouding valves but what exactly is involved with doing that? If I buy a $1800+ set of heads I'm not really going to be excited about spending MORE money on modifying a BRAND NEW set of heads...I don't really have that kind of money.
 

stangboy

Founding Member
Aug 31, 1999
3,932
469
194
New Orleans, LA
Apr 12, 2012
#17
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #17
Oh, another thing...fuel. I have and Aeromotive 340lph pump in the tank. Will that be enough to feed a 363? What size injectors will I need? I was going to be using 39s for the 342, do I need to go up to 60s for the 363? Will a 90mm 03 Cobra MAF be enough?
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,107
21,285
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 12, 2012
#18
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #18
madmike1157 said:
They don't make no stinkin' dart blocks for a 4.6
Click to expand...

4.6... 4.6... OH! Now I remember... I have one of those on my weed eater!
 
T

turbogt

Member
May 1, 2003
723
16
19
Montana
Apr 12, 2012
#19
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #19
stangboy said:
I've heard about unshrouding valves but what exactly is involved with doing that? If I buy a $1800+ set of heads I'm not really going to be excited about spending MORE money on modifying a BRAND NEW set of heads...I don't really have that kind of money.
Click to expand...


You aren't modifying anything.. The bigger bore "unshrouds" the valves, meaning it allows them to flow more. The heads don't need to be touched.
 

LarsD

Founding Member
Jul 2, 2002
2,680
119
123
Texas
Apr 12, 2012
#20
  • Apr 12, 2012
  • #20
Knowing what I know now I wish I'd gone with at least 205 TFS heads and a 363 bottom end. Or an 03/04 Cobra swap.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Digital Tuning Going heads/cam/intake. Do I need a tune?
  • karhoot
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
588
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 14, 2026
karhoot
K
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
934
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
517
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?