• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Is the IAT really needed?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KBCobra95
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Nov 22, 2005
#21
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #21
Thanks for the info fellas, I will be getting atune very very soon
 

KBCobra95

New Member
Aug 28, 2005
356
0
0
North Carolina
Nov 22, 2005
#22
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #22
I just looked at my intake and there is NO brass plug in my intake....there is no hole at all... just aluminum. Guess that means I'm gonna have to drill and tap the JLT
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 22, 2005
#23
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #23
mackey said:
If you move it to the lower intake you WILL need a tune for your car to operate correctly.
Click to expand...
you also need to splice the wires because they are not long enough to reach the new location.

i'll be using solder and shrink-wraps on mine
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 22, 2005
#24
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #24
KBCobra95 said:
I just looked at my intake and there is NO brass plug in my intake....there is no hole at all... just aluminum. Guess that means I'm gonna have to drill and tap the JLT
Click to expand...

From TMOSS from my "Going Kenne-Bell (again)" thread:

tmoss said:
Use a 9/16" drill and 3/8 NPT for the ACT.
Click to expand...
 
9

95cobradude

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
194
0
0
long island, ny
Nov 22, 2005
#25
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #25
kb, i think i have an extension harness for that connector if your interested.
 

Labora

Founding Member
Jun 11, 2000
1,855
26
69
Dallas, Texas
Nov 22, 2005
#26
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #26
xkuntrycowboyx said:
don't know if you'd wanna try this...(i dunno about 18HP) but it would b a solution to DELETING it .... i believe... http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/18HP-PERFORMANCE-CHIP-FORD-MUSTANG-87-93-94-98-99-04_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQcategoryZ33598QQitemZ8016664305QQrdZ1
Click to expand...

Wow. Why is that even posted..Total waste of time. Why don't you send me 10$ and you can unplug your IAC sensor about the same effect.
 

95COBRA241

New Member
Sep 3, 2005
339
0
0
Delray Beach, FL
Nov 22, 2005
#27
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #27
BlackVert said:
in this picture, it is just below the leftmost port. there is a brass plug in it.
Click to expand...

Isn't that a stock lower manifold. He has a '95 Cobra so there won't be a hole in the #5 runner. He will either have to drill it or buy a '93 cobra lower or I believe the explorer lower's should also have the IAT fitting in the manifold. The GT40's as well have it.
 

Attachments

  • dscf0858.webp
    108 KB · Views: 108

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Nov 22, 2005
#28
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #28
Yeah with a KB, you will max out the table on the IAC temp. So you'll need to come up with a new table to retard your timing and possibly modify the sensor to keep it withing it's operating range.
 

BlackVert

15 Year Member
Oct 3, 2003
5,589
9
98
Bethesda, MD
Nov 22, 2005
#29
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #29
95COBRA241 said:
Isn't that a stock lower manifold. He has a '95 Cobra so there won't be a hole in the #5 runner. He will either have to drill it or buy a '93 cobra lower or I believe the explorer lower's should also have the IAT fitting in the manifold. The GT40's as well have it.
Click to expand...
Nope, it's a Holley SysteMAX, you can see the name on the front, but it takes a stock gasket and has bolt holes in the stock locations.

I'm just relaying info I have learned here on this forum. Don 95Vert knows his $hit and he says moving the IAT to the #5 runner is the right thing to do for ppl with KBs. I believe him.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 22, 2005
#30
  • Nov 22, 2005
  • #30
I have not taken the time to compare the tables that would pertain to act temps between the a9l & cbaza strategys.

The a9l temps have to be higher it goes without saying.

That is only one of the reasons I think putting the a9l pcm in our cars is hokey. You got a pcm that is expecting to be see temps that are higher than what it does see.

All that was said to somehow show that just moving the act to the lower is only gonna be step one in a two step process.

The second step is ..............

One is gonna have to make adjustments to compensate for the act temps that are now much higher than expected by the pcm.

I most certainly do see the advantage of moving the act to the lower with the KB.

Grady
 

Don 95Vert

Founding Member
Oct 1, 1999
1,091
1
39
Delaware, OH
Nov 23, 2005
#31
  • Nov 23, 2005
  • #31
On an A9L the ACT doesn't pull timing until 240* - then it pulls 6*. It also limits adaptive learning above 200 and below 100 and adds fuel at and below 0*. It also adds to idle speed above 200.

On a T4M0 (94-95 % speed GT) the adaptive learning limits are wider. It also uses the ACT to add a ton of fuel above 116* up to 30% more at 200*. Then it pulls timing starting at 150* - the amount of timing depends on load and RPM - at 150* it pulls a little over 1* at max load and max RPMs - it goes up from there.

From this you can see that the ACT from the factory is in a cool place (LOL!!) - the TB/MAF pipe and if you move it, which you SHOULD do on any blower car, you absolutely need to adjust the tune to reflect this or the car will run like crap. On a blower car it's a good safety valve to prevent detonation fram a hot intake charge.

You should use a Gen 2 Lightning downstream ACT (F6SZ1-2A697A) and you'll need a new style connector too.

Don
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Blow through intercooled questions
  • AngryH58
  • Aug 31, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
228
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2026
AngryH58
A
9
Paint and Body Rust what to do now
  • 97sn95
  • Aug 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
162
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 13, 2026
Noobz347
B
Fuel 1990 installing edelBrock intake
  • Beaker
  • Oct 5, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
251
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 6, 2026
Noobz347
M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
766
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
S
ECU help!
  • starkiller1134
  • Aug 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
440
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
starkiller1134
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?