• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Is there any difference in look, feel, or weight between a 17x8 and 17x9?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date Mar 20, 2006

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Mar 20, 2006
#1
  • Mar 20, 2006
  • #1
Some wheels sell with 17x9 back and 17x8 front...Any ideas?
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Mar 20, 2006
#2
  • Mar 20, 2006
  • #2
Well, you can toss on meatier tires on the rears if the backs are wider with the 9 inch...
i'm running...
i can't remember, my lord.
I dunno, but I got 275/40s on the rear
if i upped my width on the rears, i could probably push like a 315/35
whereas you SHOULDN'T do that in the front.
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Mar 20, 2006
#3
  • Mar 20, 2006
  • #3
Caldwell said:
Well, you can toss on meatier tires on the rears if the backs are wider with the 9 inch...
i'm running...
i can't remember, my lord.
I dunno, but I got 275/40s on the rear
if i upped my width on the rears, i could probably push like a 315/35
whereas you SHOULDN'T do that in the front.
Click to expand...


dont want to hijack the thread but I want to run 275/40s in the back on 17x9 rims on STOCK suspension stuff, it'll fit without problems caldwell ? any tractions issues with those ?

Thanks
 

xc_myers_06

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
64
0
0
Nebraska
Mar 20, 2006
#4
  • Mar 20, 2006
  • #4
I would say you will see a $ increase for tires with wider wheels. You will feel a traction difference with the wider tires and also they just look much nicer especially from behind the car with big, fat wide-ass tires on it.
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Mar 21, 2006
#5
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #5
xc_myers_06 said:
I would say you will see a $ increase for tires with wider wheels. You will feel a traction difference with the wider tires and also they just look much nicer especially from behind the car with big, fat wide-ass tires on it.
Click to expand...
deep dish 17x10.5 w/ a 315/35 are what i run in the back--hawt1!!
 

Methodical

15 Year Member
Dec 1, 2003
1,192
11
59
Clinton, MD
Mar 21, 2006
#6
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #6
Wider wheels and tires:

1. fill our big wheel openning
2. makes the car look tighter -check out those BMWs
3. Just plain looks good
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Mar 21, 2006
#7
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #7
TheDamned said:
dont want to hijack the thread but I want to run 275/40s in the back on 17x9 rims on STOCK suspension stuff, it'll fit without problems caldwell ? any tractions issues with those ?

Thanks
Click to expand...
I have 275/40x17 all around on a completely stock suspension. I have had no problems with the rear tires and the fronts only rub a little on the swaybar at wheel lock. So, if you use 17x9's with the same backspacing as what the Steeda wheels have, you should be all set.
 

xc_myers_06

New Member
Aug 6, 2004
64
0
0
Nebraska
Mar 21, 2006
#8
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #8
do you need wheel spaces with 9" wide tires?
 

Blackened302

Active Member
Jul 21, 2005
1,439
0
36
South TX
Mar 21, 2006
#9
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #9
xc_myers_06 said:
do you need wheel spaces with 9" wide tires?
Click to expand...
if the car has a stock set-up outback, no you don't
 

TheDamned

"I am Canadian and Damned for it!"
Jul 22, 2003
457
0
48
Montréal, Québec, Canada
Mar 21, 2006
#10
  • Mar 21, 2006
  • #10
aight thanks guys
 

Caldwell

New Member
Apr 27, 2004
528
0
0
Ontario Canada
Mar 23, 2006
#11
  • Mar 23, 2006
  • #11
TheDamned said:
dont want to hijack the thread but I want to run 275/40s in the back on 17x9 rims on STOCK suspension stuff, it'll fit without problems caldwell ? any tractions issues with those ?

Thanks
Click to expand...

illwood said:
I have 275/40x17 all around on a completely stock suspension. I have had no problems with the rear tires and the fronts only rub a little on the swaybar at wheel lock. So, if you use 17x9's with the same backspacing as what the Steeda wheels have, you should be all set.
Click to expand...

I've never had any rubbing issues/traction problems with 275/40s on the rear, ever. Like he said though, be careful with the rubbing on the fronts. 275/40 will probably wear off the inner tire wall of your rubber sooner than it should. Ideally you'd like to get a minimal of 2 years out of tires if you're nice to them. Anticipate a swap about every year or so.

Stock suspension shouldn't have any bearing on traction so long as your suspension's still in good shape. My offset I think changed a bit. If you want, I can go hunt around to see what it was set at.
 
G

Gopher

New Member
Jan 7, 2007
2
0
2
Jan 8, 2007
#12
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #12
+1in in rears

I'm looking at the same thing for my fourth-gen Camaro. Since this is my daily driver with V6 engine, I am keeping the fronts the same width as OEM to avoid adding steering effort in turns. I am adding an inch to the rears to combat wheel slip.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Jan 8, 2007
#13
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #13
Like others have said, I think the look of wide tires on the back is great.

Sure, you are gonna have more weight with a larger wheel
and
You'll take a double hit since you will be using a larger tire

With the focus on a Street Application

Increased diameter of wheel and tire will hurt your acceleration
as it lowers the ratio.

http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/608.shtml

So you see, one could suffer a small amount of performance
when you add up the loss from all three hits

On the other hand .....
Race wheels/tires are light weight
but
They are not durable enough for street use

As for traction ..........

I read an article and the jest of it was ......
Compound of tire was more effective than width of tire

anyway

Just info to let you know about the compromise of ... looks for performance!

Mods and Compromise
Ever notice how that usually kinda goes together?

Grady
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Jan 8, 2007
#14
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #14
Gopher said:
I'm looking at the same thing for my fourth-gen Camaro. Since this is my daily driver with V6 engine, I am keeping the fronts the same width as OEM to avoid adding steering effort in turns. I am adding an inch to the rears to combat wheel slip.
Click to expand...

Kind of strange the one post count and pull up of a very old thread....and he is not asking a question......
 
T

turbogt

Member
May 1, 2003
723
16
19
Montana
Jan 8, 2007
#15
  • Jan 8, 2007
  • #15
Our cars PLOW so much we need all the tire we can get in the front.. Run 17x9's with 275/40/17.. You could run a 295/35/17 on the rear with the 17x9 or go wider.. Personally, I would run 10.5's out back. 17" tires are cheap anyway..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

305-45-17 tires on Pony wheels (17")?
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
514
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 1, 2026
limp
D
Harmonic Balancer brand, weight?
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
246
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 18, 2025
revhead347
Suspension Is somethig Wrong Here?
  • Icemanxxxv
  • Jul 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
118
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2026
AeroCoupe
P
Progress Thread Weight loss 90s coupe . -500lbs
  • ponixpress
  • Mar 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
42
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 13, 2025
ponixpress
P
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
287
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?