• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is there such a thing as a "Factory Freak"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JuggalotuStang
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 3 of 10 Next Last

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 12, 2004
#41
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #41
All I know is that anyone that thinks they have a freak or thinks someone else has a frwak, you cant compare. People call my car a freak, it isnt...

Some cars perform better but there is almost always a reason for it, or a few small reasons. In my eyes most cars out there well taken acare of can look like a freak in the hands of the right owner...

This is proven when people dont believe what me and my friends run for times at the track. If you believe in freaks I have about 5-6 cars to show you that can all be considered freaks, yet the owners wont tell you they are!
 
S

slickshift

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
51
0
0
New England
Oct 12, 2004
#42
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #42
If the factory uses tolerences for their parts, (x-z is OK, y being ideal)
You could have one car with 4 x injectors and 4 z injectors, 6 x rockers and 2 z rockers, etc.
And one car with all y injectors and rockers, etc.

I don't mean this would make one car a freak, just to point out not all leave the factory exactly the same

Once you add up all the parts like these, couldn't it make a noticable difference?
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
Oct 12, 2004
#43
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #43
I've heard that the factory stockers will go through a bunch of stock cams to find that gem of a stocker?

No 1/4 times with these #'s they closed the track

went 12.20's@114 with 330rwh(first dyno pull no tuning) on drag radials. old intake less gear no tube front end no tune.
I'd be happy w/11.60's as it sits now maybe 117 or 118

The 330rwhp is still a guess as I never dynoed the motor w/ gt-40 intake
might have been a little less then that
 
S

slickshift

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
51
0
0
New England
Oct 12, 2004
#44
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #44
Exactly
And a batch of rockers and injectors...
 

rsw007

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
469
1
0
Lexington,SC
Oct 12, 2004
#45
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #45
Not a believer of the freaks either but im sure 5.0's have a 30hp range"210-240"
mine in current form as of dyno put down 210hp/266tq and weighted 3280 with me and ran 13.35@99mph.dynoed,weighted and ran all in the same weekend.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 12, 2004
#46
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #46
rsw007 said:
Not a believer of the freaks either but im sure 5.0's have a 30hp range"210-240"
mine in current form as of dyno put down 210hp/266tq and weighted 3280 with me and ran 13.35@99mph.dynoed,weighted and ran all in the same weekend.
Click to expand...
Case in point rite here.I know guys with 5spd's and these mods and cant get these times.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 12, 2004
#47
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #47
This thread has been going all day long,all the sudden its quiet.
 
S

SCameron

New Member
Jan 28, 2004
37
0
0
Zanesville, Ohio
Oct 12, 2004
#48
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #48
No 2 motors are the same. The new cobras are built starting with a bare block now (before they started with a short block). I have seen different RWHP numbers for different cars in stock form. Can someone explain this? I used to work for Detroit Desiel. They built the series 60 motors at the plant and dynoed them. there were a few motors that just produced unexplained horsepower. must be gremlins.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 12, 2004
#49
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #49
Haahhhhh!!!! Gremlins,,freaks,,same thing Non believers
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 12, 2004
#50
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #50
LOL,,,sorry guys its late,Im tired,we been going at this all day.I got excited.But how about rsw007,,hah,,,hah
 

ninjacoupe

New Member
Jul 6, 2003
174
0
0
NY
Oct 12, 2004
#51
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #51
SCameron said:
I used to work for Detroit Desiel. They built the series 60 motors at the plant and dynoed them. there were a few motors that just produced unexplained horsepower. must be gremlins.
Click to expand...

WOW I remember those series 60 from some Peterbuilt cab overs. I used to be a deisel mech. COOLEST sounding engines ever. Way better then your runomill Catterpiller...OFF TOPIC
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 12, 2004
#52
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #52
rsw007,thanks for showing up bro I believe this debate is over
 
H

Highbredcloud

Active Member
Mar 4, 2003
1,075
1
36
Palos Hills, IL
Oct 12, 2004
#53
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #53
rsw007 said:
Not a believer of the freaks either but im sure 5.0's have a 30hp range"210-240"
mine in current form as of dyno put down 210hp/266tq and weighted 3280 with me and ran 13.35@99mph.dynoed,weighted and ran all in the same weekend.
Click to expand...

What elevation were you in when you ran your car? Those ET numbers are extrmely high for a stock 5.0...To run those times you would need about 260-270RWHP in a car that weighs 3200lbs...on top of that you have an AOD too...hmm I don't know about that.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 12, 2004
#54
  • Oct 12, 2004
  • #54
rsw007 said:
Not a believer of the freaks either but im sure 5.0's have a 30hp range"210-240"
mine in current form as of dyno put down 210hp/266tq and weighted 3280 with me and ran 13.35@99mph.dynoed,weighted and ran all in the same weekend.
Click to expand...

I see nothing "freaky" about those times...your mph shows the power you have 99mph which is right on with your horsepower...the reason why your E.T. is so low is your 60fts...

Willys1...your 60fts were closer to 2.0 weren't they?

About every full tenth taken off your 60ft takes off about .2 tenths from your E.T....

No factory freak there...just traction and good matched parts...what exactly is done to your car rsw007?
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 13, 2004
#55
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #55
Highbredcloud said:
What elevation were you in when you ran your car? Those ET numbers are extrmely high for a stock 5.0...To run those times you would need about 260-270RWHP in a car that weighs 3200lbs...on top of that you have an AOD too...hmm I don't know about that.
Click to expand...
You dont know about that?,,Let me explain,its a "FACTORY FREAK"
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Oct 13, 2004
#56
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #56
5spd GT said:
I see nothing "freaky" about those times...your mph shows the power you have 99mph which is right on with your horsepower...the reason why your E.T. is so low is your 60fts...

Willys1...your 60fts were closer to 2.0 weren't they?

About every full tenth taken off your 60ft takes off about .2 tenths from your E.T....

No factory freak there...just traction and good matched parts...what exactly is done to your car rsw007?
Click to expand...
I believe he has about what I have, plus he has ac delete.Dude admit it,those are some freaky times for a stock aod 5.0/ But yeah,those 60's are huge
 

rsw007

New Member
Jul 7, 2004
469
1
0
Lexington,SC
Oct 13, 2004
#57
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #57
ive got all the bolt-ons exept for 1.7 rockers,full suspention and built up aod with the stock gear ratio in the tranny and 4.10's when it still had power sterring and ac it ran 13.35 @ 99mph. i think now it can go 13.2's since removing that stuff and moving bat to back and glass hood
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Oct 13, 2004
#58
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #58
Ever had your car weighed? The reason why he is running so fast is because of his weight and excellent launching :thumbs up:
 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Oct 13, 2004
#59
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #59
Highbredcloud said:
What elevation were you in when you ran your car? Those ET numbers are extrmely high for a stock 5.0...To run those times you would need about 260-270RWHP in a car that weighs 3200lbs...on top of that you have an AOD too...hmm I don't know about that.
Click to expand...

Are you KIDDING??? I have 272 rwhp, an untouched original suspension and pulled 12.63. You think my car should be running mid 13s? Its not all about the power but how you manage to get it to the ground, and with a 99 mph trap, 13.3 is getting it to the ground. Plus his 210 hp is through an auto with a converter, which will kill rwhp numbers.

This isnt a factory freak, its a car that has been well planned and has the right mods!
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Oct 13, 2004
#60
  • Oct 13, 2004
  • #60
25thmustang said:
Its not all about the power but how you manage to get it to the ground, and with a 99 mph trap, 13.3 is getting it to the ground. Plus his 210 hp is through an auto with a converter, which will kill rwhp numbers.

This isnt a factory freak, its a car that has been well planned and has the right mods!
Click to expand...

Yep...the 99mph shows the actual power (which is where most people think the factory freak myth comes from = power)...that is all traction...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • …
  • 10
Next
First Prev 3 of 10 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
924
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
5
Hello Everyone !
  • 5150K
  • Jul 3, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
85
The Welcome Wagon Jul 3, 2026
5150K
5
L
Exhaust 95 gt pypes catted x pipe
  • Lx5.0fiend
  • Aug 22, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
361
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 18, 2025
revhead347
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
585
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Can ya Hemi now?
  • RaggedGT
  • Jul 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
74
Other Auto Tech Jul 2, 2026
RaggedGT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?