• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Just picked up my graduation present

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveohh94gt
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2004
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 28, 2004
#1
  • May 28, 2004
  • #1
I just got back from Powered by Ford in Orlando where i picked up my new TK-600 tranny I cant wait to get everything put together, hopefully I will be done sometime today. i know the TK-600 is a little overkill for my current combo but i dont wanna ever have to worry about a transmission again. BTW anyone now any specific way i need to break in this transmission ?
 

go-stang5.0

New Member
Jan 27, 2003
2,244
0
0
Glenview,Il
May 28, 2004
#2
  • May 28, 2004
  • #2
Hell, I've never even heard of it....Wanna give some info on it for us guyz that dont keep with the times...
 

Numbles

Active Member
Dec 10, 2003
998
0
36
Chicago, IL
May 28, 2004
#3
  • May 28, 2004
  • #3
I thought they didn't come out with that trans yet. May I ask how much you picked it up for.

For breaking it in, dunno , take it easy for the first 100 miles maybe to make sure nothing is seriously wrong then have some fun.
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
May 28, 2004
#4
  • May 28, 2004
  • #4
I think they recommend 300-500 miles of easy driving, then change the fluid, then go rip on it.

Have fun.

Joe
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 28, 2004
#5
  • May 28, 2004
  • #5
go-stang, the TK-500 and TK-600 are the two new transmissions that tremec just released. with all the goodies like bellhousing and clutch and everything i ended up paying a little over $2k, i hope its well worth it. Oh and the one i have is serial number 000002, second one they made, hopefully all the bugs were worked out on number one
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 28, 2004
#6
  • May 28, 2004
  • #6
everything finished except for filling it up with syncromesh and taking it off the jackstands, its gonna be hard to go easy on it for the break-in period
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
May 28, 2004
#7
  • May 28, 2004
  • #7
Curious as to why you chose the 600 over the 500? The gear ratios are better with the 500 IMO. 3.27 first vs 2.92 first. I think 2nd and 3rd is slightly different as well.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 29, 2004
#8
  • May 29, 2004
  • #8
i picked the 600 because with the 3.73 rear gears it makes first pretty much useless with that low of first gear. i got everything together and took it to town a little while ago and the transmission is awesome, the ratios are great. first feels like about the same ratio as the stock tranny with 3.55 gears. i cant wait for the end of the break-in period so i can really see how this transmission performs
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 29, 2004
#9
  • May 29, 2004
  • #9
That's awesome man. I'm trying to score a killer deal on a 3550, but if I had the bling to buy a new tranny it would be a TKO 500 or 600. There really isn't much price difference between the 2, and the 600 is stronger and can apparently take more punishment. Good choice!
 
A

Adrenalin

Member
Apr 25, 2004
168
0
16
Central Florida
May 29, 2004
#10
  • May 29, 2004
  • #10
I am currently running a TK500 and love it save for a few "odd" noises. First off, what does the little tag read that is bolted to the front of the transmission?

Don't forget to "index" the bellhousing if you chose the Lakewood. I also bought my TK500 from PBF and it was the very first one they sold. They also installed it and told me to break it in for 500 miles which I did and it nearly killed me!

Now keep in mind my car is stock accept for underdrives and a K&N filter so the car is so quiet you can hardly hear it run. The noise* I do hear isn't the slight gear whine that is "normal" of Tremecs but almost like a bearing gone bad (*=rattling of a sort). Driving it around town I love the way it shifts. I hear a little noise* in second gear for a split second between 1600 and 1900 rpm. I also hear the same noise* except louder in 4th gear between the same rpm. Recently another noise started only in 4th gear that begins at 3 grand and gets louder til about 3300 rpm or so then gradually falls off as the rpm increases to about 5000 rpm.

I called PBF and told them about it and I am supposed to take it over to let them check it out as soon as I have a day off. When I did call, I explained the situation to them and got this response: "I don't mean to sound rude but what in the hell were you doing in 4th gear at that rpm?" I dismissed the commment and continued the conversation until he told me I should bring it in.

I understand racing or accelerating from 1500-1900 rpm, isn't ideal but cruising, windows up, a/c on in mild traffic, in a 99.9% bone stock M u s t a n g with factory 3.27s should not be any sort of a problem with the tranny riding at that rpm. I don't think it takes a genius to figure that out. Also, the car being that stock and the tranny rated for 500 ft lbs of torque, I don't think I could have broken it either.

The reason I asked about the tag on your tranny is the tag on mine, ( I didn't write down all the numbers/letters) but saw 3550 on it. This made me wonder did I really get the TK500 or a 3550. I know the TK500 replaced the 3550 and has a red shifter (which mine does)and also as the TK600 replaced the TKO so maybe that is why the tag has 3550 on it.

Anyway I would definately pay attention to noises in that tranny. I think that although there is a new name on the trannies and maybe only a little design change, we are the guinee pigs. Wish you well on yours.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
May 29, 2004
#11
  • May 29, 2004
  • #11
Imyourzero said:
and the 600 is stronger and can apparently take more punishment. Good choice!
Click to expand...


The only difference is the gear ratio's, not power rating. The 600 also comes standard with a 26 spline input shaft I believe.
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 29, 2004
#12
  • May 29, 2004
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
The only difference is the gear ratio's, not power rating. The 600 also comes standard with a 26 spline input shaft I believe.
Click to expand...

As published by Tremec on 5speedtransmissions.com:

TKO-500: 500 lb. ft.
TKO-600: in excess of 600 lb. ft.
 
F

fiveohh94gt

New Member
Dec 26, 2003
277
0
0
May 30, 2004
#13
  • May 30, 2004
  • #13
what do u mean "index" the bellhousing if i have the lakewood? the break in period is killing me too, i really want to rip some gears and see what this tranny will really do but i know i have to take it easy for a while, i only have about 150 miles on it now. the tag on mine says something like 3550 also, along with the 000002 serial number meaning it was the second tk600 they made. so far i'm loving the TK except it takes a little more force than i like to put it into gear. i'm hoping that will loosen up by the end of the break in period.
 
A

Adrenalin

Member
Apr 25, 2004
168
0
16
Central Florida
May 30, 2004
#14
  • May 30, 2004
  • #14
fiveohh94gt said:
what do u mean "index" the bellhousing if i have the lakewood? the break in period is killing me too, i really want to rip some gears and see what this tranny will really do but i know i have to take it easy for a while, i only have about 150 miles on it now. the tag on mine says something like 3550 also, along with the 000002 serial number meaning it was the second tk600 they made. so far i'm loving the TK except it takes a little more force than i like to put it into gear. i'm hoping that will loosen up by the end of the break in period.
Click to expand...

Indexing the bellhousing - Click the link here for the info on it. Bellhousing Blues

More or less you need to do this or vibration and abnormal wear may occur. Before I had PBF install the TK500 I had a used Tremec 3550 that the bellhousing wasn't indexed (to my car) so it had some bad vibrations among other problems, and some not related to the bellhousing.
 

Imyourzero

Learned that lesson as a horny teenager with lots
Founding Member
Mar 10, 2002
2,298
0
0
Hoonose, U.S.A. Posts: 39,051
May 30, 2004
#15
  • May 30, 2004
  • #15
fiveohh94gt said:
what do u mean "index" the bellhousing if i have the lakewood? the break in period is killing me too, i really want to rip some gears and see what this tranny will really do but i know i have to take it easy for a while, i only have about 150 miles on it now. the tag on mine says something like 3550 also, along with the 000002 serial number meaning it was the second tk600 they made. so far i'm loving the TK except it takes a little more force than i like to put it into gear. i'm hoping that will loosen up by the end of the break in period.
Click to expand...

It might get somewhat better the more you drive it, but keep in mind it will never be as street-friendly as a T5. That's the price you pay for having a tranny that can take more abuse (well, except in the case of a G-Force which I hear shifts just like a stock T5).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
Fox Opinions Wanted- at a crossroad with my '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 18, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
32
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 22, 2025
pindude80
P
3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
554
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
A
Fox Planning on building my foxbody and was wondering if I can get any tips or anything to watch out for!
  • Angelq1028
  • Oct 31, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3 4
Replies
76
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Robman8028
R
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?