• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Kilrcanary

  • Thread starter Thread starter JAM
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2003
J

JAM

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
130
0
0
60
al
Dec 20, 2003
#1
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #1
could you expand on your 'maximized' theory???
i'm interested in a 331 short block , but wasn't planning on changing my present mods????

"If its a daily driver, stay with the stock flywheel IMO. Adding cubes is ALWAYS a good thing. A good rule of thumb is 1 HP per cubic inch. Sure you can exceed that, but it s good rule of thumb so you don't expect too much. The 331 will give you more low and mid range torque which is IDEAL for the street too. I'd go 331 if I were you and planning a rebuild. I have to rebuild my stang, but I will NOT be stroking it, at least I don't think so. The reason being a stroker will take my maximized combo and make it restrictive, plus I want to see how fast a 302/306 can go in one of our cars, namely my vert. If I didn't already have my cam, heads, and intake I'd do a 347 and be done with it though."
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
www.angelfire.com
Dec 20, 2003
#2
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #2
What I meant is that my H/C/I are setup to work with 302 cubes. Adding more cubes will increase the airflow demands of my motor, and thus make my current "maximized" parts on my 302 restrictive on the 331. I'd still gain some power, but I won't make as much as I could with the extra cubes. I'd need a cam with more duration, a head with more flow, and an intake with more flow and shorter runners (like and RPM). If you put your parts on a 331 it will work fine and make more power than you currently do, but you won't make anywhere near as much as you could if you had different heads, intake, etc that are setup to match the air requirements of the larger cubes.
 
J

JAM

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
130
0
0
60
al
Dec 20, 2003
#3
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #3
more hp > less hp ??

what would be the bad side of using the 331 v.s. the 306???
allowing that the motor wouldn't be optimized,,,,
>gas mpg
>cost
>reliability
>ect....
BTW thanks for the reply
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
www.angelfire.com
Dec 20, 2003
#4
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #4
Really there isn't a bad thing I can think of. Reliability shouldn't be an issue if its assembled correctly, gas mileage may be slightly less than with the 302, but I wouldn't suspect much, cost will be a little more... all in all if I were in your shoes, I'd probably opt for the stroker. Like I said, I don't want to do it as it has taken me a long time to sort out my combo to get it to run the way it does, if I added more cubes I'd be starting all over and it would bother me to know that I'm not optimized and I have HP laying in there untapped because of my induction components, plus I still want to see how far the 302/306 will take my heavy beast.
 
J

JAM

Founding Member
Oct 19, 2002
130
0
0
60
al
Dec 20, 2003
#5
  • Dec 20, 2003
  • #5
Thanks

thanks for the data, my car's running fine,, just thinking of the future
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
222
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
931
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
S
Block questions
  • s_vargas54
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
751
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 8, 2026
Trogdor
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
956
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
D
97 V6 suspension upgrades
  • Dale1bre
  • Jan 18, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
346
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jan 19, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?