• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Light caliper drag on new rear disc conversion both sides. Can I just run it down?

  • Thread starter Thread starter crazypete
  • Start date Start date Jun 14, 2005

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 14, 2005
#1
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #1
Hey guys. I finished my mc-2300c rear disc conversion: basically turbocoupe rear brakes on a mustang 8.8. Got me an SVO MC and prop valve. Took car for a drive and the rear brakes were lightly smoking. Rotors were really hot. Car didnt feel really bogged down so it must be on light contact. I remember the parking brake cables seemed really tight and were an enourmous b1tch to put in. The PB holds and releases.

As a quickfix, I sprayed the rotors with tire silicone, my favorite lubricant and took it for a drive. The smoking was gone completely but the rotors were still a bit hot. Later, after valiantly taking it up on the highway for a quick blast, the smoking returned a tiny bit...guess the silicone wore/spun off. No wheel blackness from brake dust though....odd.

Now I dont give a damn about rear brakes. Theyre bling as far as I'm concerned and their only real purpose is to make my parking brake do something. Front brakes do all the work and they are 73mm steel pistons with hawk pads. Stops the car cold solid. If it werent for the parking brake....I would be tempted to even remove the rear brakes completely for weight savings.

Could I just drip synthetic oil on the rear rotors and pads and let them "sand down" a bit or will the problem persist even after some material has been removed? I know the proper solution is to replace the calipers but at $64 EACH with like a $75 core EACH for 86 TC rear brakes, that is simply not going to happen.

Help me mickey mouse something together guys
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 14, 2005
#2
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #2
Seems kinda silly to spend the time and money on rear discs and then oil them down ...but thats just me.

Did you gut the combination valve and then install the adjustable prop valve in the rear brake like at the firewall or did you use a combination valve off of an SVO?

Also, I seem to recall that you need to modify the parking brake lever to bypass the self adjusting mechanism or something along those lines. Im too lazy to go research it right now but you might check into that. Disconnect the park brake cables and see if it still happens, at least you would isolate the problem.
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 14, 2005
#3
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #3
I used svo front calipers, the factory brakelines, svo MC and svo proportioning valve (didnt they have these same brakes out back?) and then the 2300c kit which was brackets, rotors and the calipers from the 86 tc. I used the axle brakelines and flex line from an 86 turbocoupe. Ironically, there did not seem to be much fluid dripping out at all when bleeding the brakes, barely a drip or two. I was under the impression that the lines were not working. But then I had the tail in the air, put it in gear and stepped on the brake and the rear wheels stopped.

I used the old factory front DS pv->caliper brakeline as a hardline from that distribution block on top of the axle to the PS rear brake. I needed to adapt and it was the right threads on both sides. On the DS rear, I used the TC factory hardline/rubber line original combo. Neither bled more than a hesitant few drips with engine off and me busting a vein up front stomping the pedal.

When rebuilding tracloc, I could turn the rear wheels by hand with it in the air and there was only minor minor minor drag.

You need to take out the auto adjuster? Oh......is that unhooking the spring? Where is the autoadjuster?

This whole rear disc thing was a horrendous PITA expensive mistake to have done and so I am ready to oil the SOB's to get the car back on the road. Just wondering if there is like.....a break in period for brakes?
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 14, 2005
#4
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #4
The brake lever mod includes cutting and welding the little catch mechanism if I remember. Do a google search and you will run across it I bet.

So the gold block below the MC...that came from the SVO?
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 14, 2005
#5
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #5
AHA!!!

This is my problem!! The spring would providde just enough force to cause the slight drag but not enough to slow the car down.

But I am confused.....with the ratchet welded.....wont the parking brake not stay up? I need to go take it apart tonight and look at the insides.
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 14, 2005
#6
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #6
crazypete said:
AHA!!!

This is my problem!! The spring would providde just enough force to cause the slight drag but not enough to slow the car down.

But I am confused.....with the ratchet welded.....wont the parking brake not stay up? I need to go take it apart tonight and look at the insides.
Click to expand...
I dont think you weld on the part that holds it up. Seems like there is something else in there that only effects the self adjusting mechanism. Did you find the article?

Also...you DID use the FMS ebrake cables right?
 

MrKwik

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
1,008
0
0
Kansas City, Kansas
Jun 14, 2005
#7
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #7
I was also thinking about your bleeding issue. Did you bench bleed the MC before you installed it? If not, you will most likely have a hell of a time getting the system to bleed out right. Just thinking out loud here.
 
T

tjm73

Founding Member
Aug 3, 2000
2,418
2
48
Rush, NY
Jun 14, 2005
#8
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #8
All disc brakes drag slightly. This is normal.
 
M

MarkFJ40

Member
Jun 3, 2005
44
0
6
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Jun 14, 2005
#9
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #9
Is that master cylinder for 4wheel discs ?
Drum brake master cylinders have a residual pressure valve that keeps some pressure in the line to keep the wheel cylinder setup.
Calipers don't need this pressure and that could be what is causing your drag.
don't oil your pads. You can throw them away if you did. They're done.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 14, 2005
#10
  • Jun 14, 2005
  • #10
I have the TC rearend in my car, & it caused the rear brakes to drag slightly if I ever used the parking brake. I did the parking brake lever mod, and my problems have cleared up.


See http://www.mustangcentral.net/tech/brake.html for help with the emergency brake - the stock setup tends to lock up and not release properly.
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 15, 2005
#11
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #11
The pads are not oiled but they have some residual tire silicone on them that will burn off with a little heat.

That link is gold. I now see what they are trying to do visually. Apparently you defeat the big loop spring then fuse the adjuster teeth together and cut a tab so it sits down......

My kit seems to have come with the exact same equalizer I already had and a set of ebrake cables that were identical to the ones already in the car. I swapped both in anyways.

About that procedure...

Does the parking brake still work that way, button and all? Can I still lift it hearing a ratchet sound then push the button to make it go down or is this now a yank and hold up e-brake for e-brake use and not parking brake use? Honestly.....after putting the equalizer in once....thats it. It's not coming off. It was such a pain I still vividly remember it. Will this work without the threaded bolt adjuster? Cant I just....torch the spring or unhook it and spin it one turn and hook it back so it has far less tension? I kinda like my ebrake since I live on a hill and all.
 

Asha'man

Founding Member
Feb 5, 2002
1,909
0
0
Denver
Jun 15, 2005
#12
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #12
'86 TC had drums, just FYI. '87-'88 had the desirable discs.

Brian
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 15, 2005
#13
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #13
Woops, you're right!

Wow, the 87-88 rear calipers are even more expensive! 72$ each with $80 core each. And thats just reman stuff....
 

vristang

15 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
4,933
101
124
Seattle
Jun 15, 2005
#14
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #14
Just thought I would throw out a safety concern. I have been told that silicone cannot be removed from a material once it has been applied. This is from building 777s for 6yrs. If silicone has gotten onto the rotors or pads they will both have silicone on them forever. There was some debate as to how much material you would have to grind down on the contaminated part to reach virgin material (and whether it could be done at all).

I realize that the original poster does not care about rear brake performance, but for any car that is on the street this would scare me. If it were my car I would toss the rotors and the pads, as I would not trust their performance when I needed it (desperate braking in an emergency)

This is just my opinion, I'm not looking to start an argument. Just wanted to through out my experience and opinion.
Jason
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 15, 2005
#15
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #15
Well, the way I look at it:

1. The rear brakes do about 15-20% of the overall braking.
2. Lets say once the pad has heated through and burned off the silicone, I get back to 50% of their original effectiveness (which isnt much to begin with)
3. Effect: I'm at 90-93% braking efficiency

So yes, I am unconcerned with the loss of brake effectiveness. Based on their smoking and the car's excellent braking performance even with smoking rear siliconed pads, I'd say the brakes have plenty of friction left.

The SVO master cylinder is a dual reservior MC. Chance of me losing both circuits without noticing (if I notice, I'll use the remaining circuit to stop the car) and then having to rely on the ebrake is very very slim.

What you said about silicone is why I love, absolutely love to use it as a lubricant. Good stuff!
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jun 15, 2005
#16
  • Jun 15, 2005
  • #16
crazypete said:
About that procedure...

Does the parking brake still work that way, button and all? Can I still lift it hearing a ratchet sound then push the button to make it go down or is this now a yank and hold up e-brake for e-brake use and not parking brake use? Honestly.....after putting the equalizer in once....thats it. It's not coming off. It was such a pain I still vividly remember it. Will this work without the threaded bolt adjuster? Cant I just....torch the spring or unhook it and spin it one turn and hook it back so it has far less tension? I kinda like my ebrake since I live on a hill and all.
Click to expand...
I used the FMS M-2810-A center Ebrake cable and modfied the ebrake handle per the instructions at http://www.mustangcentral.net/tech/brake.html. The brake handle works just like stock, the button unlocks it, the rachet allows you to set it where you want it. I used cutoff tool to remove the spring. Be sure to closely follow the instructions on how to weld the ebrake handle. I didn't and the first handle made it hard to get the proper cable adjustment.
 

crazypete

All my crevices are greased.
Oct 22, 2004
930
4
18
Arlington, MA
Jun 16, 2005
#17
  • Jun 16, 2005
  • #17
Well that was definately the problem! I didnt have a chance to roadtest it but the amount of force coming from that spring was definately pulling on the ebrake cables a bunch. I cut the spring off completely and the tab on top. I goofed and welded the adjuster on the second tooth from the beginning (looking at the picture this morning) but oh well. No adjuster underneath but lets hope this is enough to effect brake operation. Did it with the handle in the car.

Handle still ratchets and gives plenty of resistence so I think I am ok.

Thanks guys!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Brakes Rear brakes feel stuck after replacing pads and rotors
  • 99stanggtvinx
  • Aug 31, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
527
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 1, 2024
nickyb
S
Drivetrain 8.8 Pinion and 302 rear main seal leaks after replacing. 93 5.0 with t-5
  • Steigy4827
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
668
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 1, 2026
Steigy4827
S
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
Granada Front Disc, 9” Drum Rear, 86 Bronco II MC, and Manual Brakes - Pedal Slack
  • AeroCoupe
  • Jul 8, 2023
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 14, 2023
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?