• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Limits of twEECer

  • Thread starter Thread starter loud 95
  • Start date Start date Feb 25, 2006

loud 95

New Member
May 29, 2003
562
0
0
Milwaukie, OR
Feb 25, 2006
#1
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #1
I will soon be building a low compression, Dart blocked 347 for my '95 GT. I am also planning to run a twin turbo kit on this engine. Has anyone tuned a similar combo with a twEECer or twEECer R/T? Is it possible to attain good driveability with an extreme combo like this? At this time, I would like to avoid popping for an AEM EMS or similar stand alone system.
 

blksn955.o

Founding Member
Mar 15, 2002
3,263
0
66
st.louis mo 314
Feb 25, 2006
#2
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #2
I would not think it would be too bad....

Now if your going to rev the thing to 8k+ and whatnot the factory tables realy wont give you much tuneability at those high rpm's, it should be ok though.

If your going with such a high $$$ setup IMHO I wouldnt expect a factory type "piggyback" setup to be the absolute best route.

with a good TT347 you have some realy high hp numbers that are possible...say 750-1000 or so...I would REALY be thinking about a F.A.S.T. setup or something at that point to get the most out of your combos parts and money spent.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Feb 25, 2006
#3
  • Feb 25, 2006
  • #3
The base Tweecer is next to worthless IMHO simply because you give up the most valuable asset the Tweecer has to offer ...... Data Logging.

Even the more so with what kind of plans you tell us about.

Several forced combos like you talk about on the Tweecer site. They seem to be able to tune for good drivability if you ask me.

I think you could make it happen but check for yourself.

http://eectuning.org/forums/viewforum.php?f=2

Grady
 
S

silversaleen01

New Member
Mar 2, 2006
15
0
0
Mar 3, 2006
#4
  • Mar 3, 2006
  • #4
I am new to this site so sorry i didn't get to put my .02 in earlier. I talked to the guy at induction concepts sick sick tt people. I want to build a tt car but have to finish this project first I hate priorities lol. He said as far as drivebility is concerned whose got a better setup than ford? Also eec 5 if that is what your running can support 112.5 pound injectors that is a lot of gas mang. There are also impedence crossovers to run bigger injectors yet. Everything that I have heard is that FAST is basically wide open not to much driveability in it. Hope this helps
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
584
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SOLD For Sale '92 LX Street/Drag car - WV
  • MikeyMustang
  • Apr 12, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Dec 31, 2025
MikeyMustang
So, inflation's a b@#$^, but car part inflation's even worse!
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2024
Mustang5L5
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?