• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Long tube vs. short tube headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bullitt23
  • Start date Start date Dec 21, 2006
B

bullitt23

New Member
Dec 20, 2006
4
0
0
Dec 21, 2006
#1
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #1
Whats the difference as to sound and performance? if i got long tube i'd get a magnaflow x pipe with cats, and either way im going with borla exhaust. what would you guys recomend?
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
Dec 21, 2006
#2
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #2
you get a lot better gains wiht mid length or long tube headers. i personally will be going with short tube as where i live (CA) there are no legal mid or long tubes as they require removal or relocation of the stock cats.
 

merc123

Active Member
Jan 27, 2003
420
2
39
North GA
Dec 21, 2006
#3
  • Dec 21, 2006
  • #3
Headers in general will change (increase) the amount of sound outputted by your exhaust.

Generally speaking, dyno results have yielded higher performance from a L/T header and lower performance from a shorty.

If you don't have emissions testing I would recommend doing L/T, magnaflow non-catted X and borla. It will give you a lot more sound and a little more horsepower (less torque though). If you want to stay legal though, go with the setup you have chosen.
 

BooWFO

New Member
May 10, 2005
991
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 22, 2006
#4
  • Dec 22, 2006
  • #4
I'm running FRPP shorties, Pypes Xpipe, Borla catback. With the addition of the FRPP's I picked up 20rwhp v the stock manifolds that seems to be the exception rather than the rule on shorties though.
If your going to go LT's I'd suggest some that will clear for tranny removal, Flowtech's / hookers do, so do kook's but they kinda $$ IMO.
 

mustangkid05

New Member
Mar 10, 2006
199
0
0
Dec 22, 2006
#5
  • Dec 22, 2006
  • #5
lt's = pita to install
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Boosted Boss 302 HP/TQ
  • coltoncaskey12
  • May 24, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
98
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech May 24, 2026
coltoncaskey12
C
L
Is catback worth it over axle backs?
  • Lorencarson
  • May 15, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
690
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 15, 2025
89ripper
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
734
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
0
Engine Multiple o2 sensor codes, car runs terrible
  • 02newedge
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
527
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
302
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?