• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Low dyno numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 795.0pacecar
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 7, 2007
#1
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #1
Combos in my sig. I tried different fuel pressures and timing and the best was with 15º base timing and 39psi. Im going to do a compression test next weekend. The only thing I can think of otherwise is the heads are too big for my combo and there just isn't enough velocity. What do you guys think. It kind of sucks that the only thing I gained was a cool sounding idle.


 

25thmustang

Mustang Master
Sep 5, 2003
2,021
85
99
Montgomery, NY
Apr 7, 2007
#2
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #2
The curves look really nice, but I do agree, I would have expected more. I think your on the right track, maybe just a mismatch on the parts. Take this combo to the track and get those numbers, make it a lot easier to see if you are happy where it is!
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 7, 2007
#3
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #3
Yeah, thats what I plan to do because in the end how fast it runs is what really matters. Maybe in a few months I may switch over to some TFS heads. At the very least it feels quite a bit faster, probably because after the power comes on it stays on to limiter.
 

txstang84

15 Year Member
May 21, 2005
1,639
42
69
Tuscola, tx
Apr 7, 2007
#4
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #4
...think you're right about the velocity bit...maybe need more cam to take advantage of the big valves and runners?
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 7, 2007
#5
  • Apr 7, 2007
  • #5
Thats what I've been told, but I'm not wanting to do a complete rebuild or notch pistons, so when the time comes Im thinkin I'll just use TFS heads.
 

SRT

New Member
Jan 7, 2007
29
0
0
MA
Apr 8, 2007
#6
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #6
+1 From everything I have read about, most people are running those heads on strokers and 351's, they are probably a little too big.

maybe just match the cam to them and you would be screaming
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Apr 8, 2007
#7
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #7
any tuning besides fuel pressure/timing? a personal tuner? i would have thought somewhere in the 285ish range.
 

JChalfan

Member
Nov 27, 2002
551
0
16
Bellevue, WA
Apr 8, 2007
#8
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #8
I don't mean to hijack too much here, but that's a badass looking car.

Jeff
 

shadow89gt

New Member
Dec 11, 2002
17
0
0
Lexington, Kentucky
Apr 8, 2007
#9
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #9
Hhm... you should be making quite a bit more than that really, I'd say there is a pretty big mismatch between those heads and that cam. Some longtubes would probably help a bit as well. My car with a stock 200k mile longblock (stock H/C/I/TB/MAS) with pulleys, ebay cai, msd box, and Longtubes/h pipe/blowmasters made 225 rwhp, and ran 13.56 @ 99 mph, so if you do run it before you change anything, that might be some numbers to compare to.
 

mstngjoe

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
428
0
0
Oregon
Apr 8, 2007
#10
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #10
I would think a bigger cam would be a better match for the heads. Those are Vic Jr knockoffs with 2.05 valves and a lot of runner volume. Not sure of the cross section, but I'll guess it's same or close to the Vic Jr.

Did you check the port alignment between the lower intake and the heads? I've heard of significant mismatch in this area with those heads.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 8, 2007
#11
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #11
The ports actually lined up perfectly. Everyone has been tellin me its the cam and A/F mixture, even the guy runnin the dyno. I was trying to avoid having to notch the pistons but I guess theres really no way around that. What off the shelf cam would you guys recommend? I will go custom but I'd like to get an idea on how big it might be.
 
R

Redrooster

New Member
Jul 13, 2005
73
0
0
Apr 8, 2007
#12
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #12
Where did you have it dynoed? I live in Griffin. Just curious.
 

Cwalk

New Member
Sep 25, 2006
78
0
0
Virginia Beach, Va
Apr 8, 2007
#13
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #13
All that money you were going to invest in a set of TFS. Just get a budget stroker kit. Since you're another daily driver anyway. The extra cubes will help you really take advantage of those heads. And get the bigger cam like I told you on corral, lol. Also get a tune. Forgot to tell you that on the corral. And I found a few places that still sell those wheels. Even in a five lug. Isnt the camaro/firebird still a 5x4.5?
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 8, 2007
#14
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #14
Redrooster said:
Where did you have it dynoed? I live in Griffin. Just curious.
Click to expand...

Coupe Performance, in Covington. The guy who owns the place (Scott) posts on the streetcarforums.com



I hadn't thought of the stroker thing, thats not a bad idea. One of the guys on the corral lives real close to me and next weekend he said he will introduce me to the guy who tuned his car. So I may go that route since its not a huge expense and wont create alot of down time for my car.
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Apr 8, 2007
#15
  • Apr 8, 2007
  • #15
its def the cam man.. contact Jay Allen.

The heads are NOT too big. Dont listen those comments.
 
R

Redrooster

New Member
Jul 13, 2005
73
0
0
Apr 9, 2007
#16
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #16
Its not the cam either. There are alot of people making 300+rwhp with a stg 1 cam.

What is the combustion chamber size? Isn't it like 70cc? I'm almost certain the Victor Jrs are. The procomp heads don't flow that well either. They are also known to have large differences in flow from port to port. They don't flow any better than a set of TFS TW,but with a whole lot more port volume.
 

795.0pacecar

lover of pudgy polygamists
Jul 11, 2003
480
0
17
Senoia, GA
Apr 9, 2007
#17
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #17
The heads have 61cc chambers. They also look identical to vic jr.s, I have seen both up close.
 

white99gt

Founding Member
Aug 8, 2000
4,649
1
0
stockbridge,Ga(near atlanta)
Apr 9, 2007
#18
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #18
I love internet techs..Its easy to throw parts at something that isnt yours.

Like i said on the corral ,get a tune so everything is 100% THEN worry about changing something later.
 

poneypower89

Now everyone in the world will know I wanna bang t
Dec 6, 2004
0
3
28
Indianapolis, Indiana
Apr 9, 2007
#19
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #19
Redrooster said:
Its not the cam either. There are alot of people making 300+rwhp with a stg 1 cam.
Click to expand...

Just because "someone" made power with that cam does not mean it will work in his set-up.

The TFS-1 cam is a very mild cam designed to work primarly with the TW heads. The heads pacecar have are MUCH larger and pretty different design wise. This would require different valve train events and such.. aka a poor miss-match of the tfs-1 cam.
 

mstngjoe

Founding Member
Jul 26, 2002
428
0
0
Oregon
Apr 9, 2007
#20
  • Apr 9, 2007
  • #20
white99gt said:
......get a tune........
Click to expand...

The original post indicated a tune has been done.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Engine Rough idle and aggressive sputtering when accelerating
  • 88vertible
  • Aug 13, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 13, 2025
Jarhead67
J
Engine 1990 LX 5.0L EFI Mustang Fuel Management Problems - HELP!
  • 5.0LXStanger
  • May 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 11, 2025
5.0LXStanger
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
645
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Forced Induction Bypass valve backwards?
  • Dontknowchit
  • Jun 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
293
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 29, 2025
JD1964
9
1995 5.0 just cranks
  • 9GT5
  • Jun 29, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
1
Views
341
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2025
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?