• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Lowering Engine with TCP Motor Mounts -- How to Post Photo?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 70FB 383EFI
  • Start date Start date Nov 28, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Apr 10, 2004
#21
  • Apr 10, 2004
  • #21


You can lower the motor with the early '65 three piece mounts. The early '65 mounts hold the motor lower in the car than the '66 style mounts anyway, if you drill a hole lower on the C shaped piece of the mount like I did, it will lower the motor 3/4". I had to do it to fit the Tubular Automotive headers to the Cleveland in the car years ago. We use www.fordpowertrain.com headers now and the motor sits in the stock location. I noticed no gain in handling from the motor sitting 3/4" lower. The small bolt is to keep the mount from coming apart. We also use a torque strap. Remember if you lower the motor in a 4-speed car the clutch linkage with have to be bent to accomodate the lowering of the motor. The throttle linkage may be at a different angle too. I don't think it would be worth it on a street car or a track car that wasn't driven for points for money.




John
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Apr 11, 2004
#22
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #22
John, good stuff and I also use a torque strap, which, in my case is actually a chain.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 

xoxbxfx

Founding Member
May 9, 2001
3,959
0
0
Southlake, TX
Apr 11, 2004
#23
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #23
he used tcp mounts and flipped the bracket over I believe. He needed to lower the motor to put a TFS 351 intake on his motor. Since its EFI, the intake sits like 7" tall. When I had a Trickflow intake on my 393, the hood would barely not close. If the motor was about 1" lower, it would fit. The torque shouldnt pull the motor enough to make it hit. THe TCP Mounts are the key.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Apr 11, 2004
#24
  • Apr 11, 2004
  • #24
I'm not sure how you would flip this over and get away with it. It looks like if you flipped the piece on the motor over it would lower the motor more than 1".


With our car, if I lowered the motor more than 3/4" from the way it sat on the early style mounts, the center link would hit the oil pan at full lock. I have a worn oil pan and center link to prove it. You can lower the motor only so much with stock steering. None of our cars have a rack, so it may work fine with one of those with some clutch and throttle linkage work.

John
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Apr 12, 2004
#25
  • Apr 12, 2004
  • #25
Opentracker said:
None of our cars have a rack, so it may work fine with one of those with some clutch and throttle linkage work.
Click to expand...
It should work but getting a full inch with the TCP rack is going to be REALLY tight. Here's a picture of my 351W in a 67, stock mounts, Hedman long-tubes. There's room in there, a 0.75 drop would work fine.

 

Attachments

  • randpsmall2.webp
    111 KB · Views: 165

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#26
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #26
Did we ever get photos here of more details on the flipping concept?
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Oct 22, 2004
#27
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #27
The original designer of the tcp mounts believe it or not is John from JMC motorsports. He was tight with Terry back then and he was just getting a royalty.

They do lower the engine a bit although I'm not sure how much. It can make the headers a real issue fitting between the towers. However it does virtually eliminate the need to do the complete tunnel mod with new sheet metal. But you still have to cut out the crossmember support and weld in some flat stock about 3/4 of the way up the tunnel... A little trim job on the front of the shifter hole as well...

 

Attachments

  • tunnel-mod1.webp
    45.9 KB · Views: 186

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Oct 22, 2004
#28
  • Oct 22, 2004
  • #28
Disclosure: Looking at methods of getting the 351W in my '67 lower so I can go to a flat hood (steel for fit and finish).
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Oct 23, 2004
#29
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #29
I thought about this a month or so ago. I think I'd just get the chassis mounts remade with the bit with the hole for the bolt that joins the engine and chassis mounts a bit lower.

Make sure it is vertical to, you don't want to just move the tab down the side of the chassis plates, if they aren't vertical, you may have to move it into or out of the chassis plates.
 
C

Cbarton

New Member
Feb 27, 2003
176
0
0
Santa Ana, CA
Oct 23, 2004
#30
  • Oct 23, 2004
  • #30
I was told once that the TCP mounts are the same as the 65's, so they WILL lower your engine as long as your aren't currently using 65 motor mounts......

Chris Barton
 
M

Mosse

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
229
0
0
Finland, Tampere
Oct 25, 2004
#31
  • Oct 25, 2004
  • #31
I´ve got -65 set in my -66 with 351, and the engine dropped something around 1" with them. i had to modify clutch linkage and the point it attaches to body. I lenghtening the upper part of the link about on inch So that it still evades steering column. It wasn´t really so hard... Soon I´ll have to modify my transmission crossmember to lower the transmission too, cause I don´t think my yoke is getting enough oil, cause it´s a bit low on front. Luckily the winter is coming, it would be difficult to put it back to garage with out...
 
G

gsxrken

Member
Sep 12, 2005
206
1
18
Weschester County, NY
May 8, 2007
#32
  • May 8, 2007
  • #32
Cbarton said:
I was told once that the TCP mounts are the same as the 65's, so they WILL lower your engine as long as your aren't currently using 65 motor mounts...... Chris Barton
Click to expand...

I'd like to hear if someone can back this up. I have stock 351W mounts in my MAch 1 and I'm looking to drop the motor a half inch or so. Thanks
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
H
SOLD Trick Flow 351w R series EFI manifold upper and lower NEW In BOX NEVER installed
  • Hizdudeness
  • Mar 6, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
2
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Mar 6, 2024
Hizdudeness
H
For Sale 94 Cobra 408w AOD Project For Sale
  • Labora
  • Oct 11, 2024
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
1K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Apr 7, 2025
Labora
D
351C Engine Swap Motor Mounts
  • djd1230
  • May 17, 2021
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- May 17, 2021
djd1230
D
3
WTB/Trade Motor mounts for clutch pedal? :)
  • 351MooseStang
  • Dec 22, 2020
  • Mustang II Parts
Replies
0
Views
2K
Mustang II Parts Dec 22, 2020
351MooseStang
3
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?