you bashed my thread and pretty much everything i said. with that, im going to defend what i stated. the last post i made was just a hit back at you, thinking you could take it well.
im not arguing with physics. and you are not "trying to help out" . you giving a my way or the highway speech. hanky doesn't know all, so why act like it?
the input is appreciated, its a forum. but like stated above, try and have a little tact about it. last time i checked, you never rode in my 95. so i think its fair to say, you have no clue what it rode like, how it handled, or was able to have any knowledge or first hand sight to see what parts were NOT worn out, etc. same thing with my 2000.
as stated several times, its not a track car. there is no need to spend a ton of money on
suspension components that are not needed. think about how many people lower their mustang every day doing the same setup i did. you honestly think all those people wear out their
suspension, shocks, struts, etc in a years time - no.
the parts i have listed DO WORK CORRECTLY. i never said they were ideal. take the thread for what it is and comment all you want but have a little class when you do it.
, the entire point and title of the thread was lower your mustang on a budget. It did not say lower your mustang get maximum performance and handle like a Formula 1 car. Yes the sportline spring doesn't do the best for actual suspension performance but if your looking for the best stance of your car they have to be one of the best and most widely used springs ever. And I don't see to many cars loosing it in the turns on the street because of a set of sportlines. I mean you make it sound like any car with this set up is crap. Well my car runs this set up handles great on the curves no complaints what so ever. So next time do us all a favor and read the title of the thread assess the point of the thread before you post.
ics:
