• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Lowering your mustang on a budget - with new parts!

  • Thread starter Thread starter fiveoho
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jan 31, 2010
#81
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #81
OK, here's my opinion. Its definitely unnecessary to get the X2's for the added drop. While it may be another road to get there, it sounds like its not worth the money at this point in time. On my old car, like I said I had Sportlines and I ran them with no isos at all in the front, and only one of the iso's in back (can't remember which one). Regardless, the cheapest and easiest way is to remove the front iso's for sure. I promise you that you will be satisfied with the added .5" or so. Here is a pic for reference for you:



Another point that I have made before that I will say again is that at some point you will reach the point where your 94-04 specific struts will bottom out on their travel up front. That said, if you have that issue, just get some Fox-specific struts for the front. I ran KYB GR2's and they were cheap and rode great. I think they were maybe $50 or $60 each. Just some food for thought man, good luck!
 

HankyGT

Member
Jan 15, 2006
81
3
6
Warren, OH
Jan 31, 2010
#82
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #82
^^ Your strut 'bottoming out' is completely affected by the design and shim height of your CC plate. Although it's a 'trick' to run a a strut designed for a different application; it is a bandaid and should not be nessesary.

Yank the iso's; make sure you set up your CC plates correctly...call it a day
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Jan 31, 2010
#83
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #83
stprorolla49 said:
OK, here's my opinion. Its definitely unnecessary to get the X2's for the added drop. While it may be another road to get there, it sounds like its not worth the money at this point in time. On my old car, like I said I had Sportlines and I ran them with no isos at all in the front, and only one of the iso's in back (can't remember which one). Regardless, the cheapest and easiest way is to remove the front iso's for sure. I promise you that you will be satisfied with the added .5" or so. Here is a pic for reference for you:



Another point that I have made before that I will say again is that at some point you will reach the point where your 94-04 specific struts will bottom out on their travel up front. That said, if you have that issue, just get some Fox-specific struts for the front. I ran KYB GR2's and they were cheap and rode great. I think they were maybe $50 or $60 each. Just some food for thought man, good luck!
Click to expand...

car looks really nice. good stance to it. you and hanky are both right about the shocks/struts. i know the oem replacements are not the best for longevity but they do work. i knew before buying them that they would wear out faster with a lowered car but i know ill get my moneys worth with them also.

thanks for the pic. did your car sit noticeably higher b4 you took them out?
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Jan 31, 2010
#84
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #84
HankyGT said:
Yank the iso's; make sure you set up your CC plates correctly...call it a day
Click to expand...

i think im gonna try this, hopefully within the next week or two (whenever access to the lift comes avail). this may be the simple solution im looking for. i think i will tape the pigtails b4 reinstalling the springs.

fingers crossed.
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jan 31, 2010
#85
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #85
I wonder how long electrical tape would last honestly. Its so soft that I would assume it would rub right through. And if you tape the piss out of the spring, you might as well put the isolator back in ya know? I dont think the tape would hurt anything, just wondering if it would help at all either.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Jan 31, 2010
#86
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #86
95BlueStallion said:
I wonder how long electrical tape would last honestly. Its so soft that I would assume it would rub right through. And if you tape the piss out of the spring, you might as well put the isolator back in ya know? I dont think the tape would hurt anything, just wondering if it would help at all either.
Click to expand...

im honestly wondering the same thing. i can say i have searched a ton of threads and alot of guys have done it and reported good results . in fact, a few specifically said theirs squeaked until they took the springs back out and taped them. like you said, i cant get crazy wrapping them or i will add to much thickness.

wont know till i try i guess
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Jan 31, 2010
#87
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #87
Well give it hell and post more pics!
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Jan 31, 2010
#88
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #88
95BlueStallion said:
Well give it hell and post more pics!
Click to expand...



10 4



one guy posted how he sprayed some rubber coating inside the spring cup. dunno if id wanna try that or not
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Jan 31, 2010
#89
  • Jan 31, 2010
  • #89
HankyGT said:
^^ Your strut 'bottoming out' is completely affected by the design and shim height of your CC plate. Although it's a 'trick' to run a a strut designed for a different application; it is a bandaid and should not be nessesary.

Yank the iso's; make sure you set up your CC plates correctly...call it a day
Click to expand...

While I do agree to an extent, I did have my c/c plates shimmed to the point where the piston of the strut was as expanded as far as possible through the top of the c/c plate without hitting the inside of the hood, and it still bottomed out on large bumps. Again, not starting an argument because I do agree that it is all about the shim height of the c/c plate, but when you can't shim anymore, you gotta do what you gotta do. Just stating to the OP that if he has this issue and he can't adjust it anymore through the c/c plate that Fox struts are an option. It just gave me piece of mind that god forbid I hit a big bump I wouldn't need to cringe when the strut compressed
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 16, 2010
#90
  • Feb 16, 2010
  • #90
These came in today. hated to do it but maybe this will solve my front fender gap problem.


 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 16, 2010
#91
  • Feb 16, 2010
  • #91
HankyGT said:
make sure you set up your CC plates correctly...call it a day
Click to expand...

i thought of something. this may or may not be relevant. after everything was installed when we lowered the car, we took it out for a test drive. immediately we noticed a horribly loud metallic thud noise that was constant. brought the car back to the shop and noticed the strut was moving vertically thru the CC plates. the kit was suppose to come with spacers ( pretty sure on that) but didnt. we rounded up a spacer for each side and that stopped the noise and slack. could that spacer(s) we added cause the front end to sit higher?
 

HankyGT

Member
Jan 15, 2006
81
3
6
Warren, OH
Feb 16, 2010
#92
  • Feb 16, 2010
  • #92
It very well could be depending on where the spacers sat, bumpstops etc. Check with your instructions on your CC plates and make sure they are not fox style aswell. I still fail to believe it's the springs causing a ridehight issue.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 17, 2010
#93
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #93
i double checked. the cc plates i ordered were 94-04 specific. the spacers could be the problem you think? w/o them it clanks like a mofo.

im open to all suggestions but im hesitant to think its anything other than the springs. i had the same cc plates, the same springs, same isolators, basically the same shocks/struts ( 01 takes-offs ) on my 95 and it sat a heck of alot better than the car i have now. however, it did have a little lopsidedness to it in the rear. and i have noticed this on my silver car ( in different parking lots - same stance ) that the rear is noticeable lower on one side than the other
 

HankyGT

Member
Jan 15, 2006
81
3
6
Warren, OH
Feb 17, 2010
#94
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #94
Let me dig a little bit for you if I can find some CC plate instructions and the like and go over them. Could be the 4.6s just plain sit different with the same springs, just strikes me odd.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 17, 2010
#95
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #95
well i appreciate you doing that. i still have not got a chance to check the front bumpstops.

just browsing around....MM kit (MMCC9994) supplies bumpstops with their cc plates. also, according to their pdf install instructions spacer placement looks very important.


"For cars at stock ride height:

• Install 2 long spacers and 1 short spacer below the
spherical bearing. Install 1 short spacer above the
spherical bearing. There should be a total of 4 spacers
per side."

"For lowered cars:

• If using any of the Tokico 3026 series of struts, use
the spacer guideline above for vehicles at stock ride
height. Failure to do so will severely limit droop travel
and may contribute to unsafe driving conditions.
• For all other struts, install 1 short spacer below the
spherical bearing. Install 2 long and 1 short spacer
above the spherical bearing. There should be a total of
4 spacers per side."


perhaps the washer was suppose to be installed below the bearing of the cc plate rather than above? if memory serves me right, it was above.

dumb question here but how would i tell if the car is riding on the front bumpstops if they are covered by the dust boot?



edit : washer = spacer
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 17, 2010
#96
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #96
i think these are the instructions for the cc plates per UPR

http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/yhst...stang-94-Caster-Camber-Plate-Installation.pdf


It shows a large spacer below the plate, then a small one above it. actually if im reading it right, more than one above it. i remember installing a spacer on each side above the plate (after we drove it). and i believe the installer said there were spacers that he installed below. supposedly, the kit shorted us spacers so used our own spacers. maybe the ones we used were to thick? too thin?

would it make any difference if that spacer was installed under the plate rather than above? or vice versa. how would that change the ride height? or would it?
 
9

94gtfreak

Active Member
Oct 19, 2008
412
4
39
your moms house
Feb 17, 2010
#97
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #97
It might help a lil bit if you could post up a pic or two or your CC plates.
 

HankyGT

Member
Jan 15, 2006
81
3
6
Warren, OH
Feb 17, 2010
#98
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #98
After reading what you have given and dug around myself:

Yes, if it is too long on the bottom, it is going to limit the downward travel of the shock to where it's not compressing. The extra long under the plate is acting like a bumpstop more or less. The difference in travel if the car was loose should have been shimmed only above the spherical bearing, with the shortest shim available underneath.

Take the CC plates apart, put the shortest shim it came with under the main bearing and you can use whatever you want to make up the space above. That should fix it.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 17, 2010
#99
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #99
94gtfreak said:
It might help a lil bit if you could post up a pic or two or your CC plates.
Click to expand...

im in the process of moving and the car is my garage at my new location. next time i am there, ill try and remember to snap a pic. visuals help.
 

fiveoho

15 Year Member
Apr 28, 2005
1,958
16
69
TN
Feb 17, 2010
#100
  • Feb 17, 2010
  • #100
HankyGT said:
After reading what you have given and dug around myself:

Yes, if it is too long on the bottom, it is going to limit the downward travel of the shock to where it's not compressing. The extra long under the plate is acting like a bumpstop more or less. The difference in travel if the car was loose should have been shimmed only above the spherical bearing, with the shortest shim available underneath.

Take the CC plates apart, put the shortest shim it came with under the main bearing and you can use whatever you want to make up the space above. That should fix it.
Click to expand...

i remember the final shimming we did was above the bearing. the kit didnt include enough spacers but maybe, like you said, the long spacer that was put under the bearing should have gone on top. refering to the install instructions tho, it says long spacer under bearing.

hell i dunno. my head hurts from trying to figure out what the problem is. best thing to do is get the car back in the shop when possible and go back over everything. just will annoy me to no end until i figure it out.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
94
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
M
Progress Thread mkk50's Progress Thread
  • mkk50
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
798
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 22, 2025
Noobz347
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
174
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
What's your tow rig?
  • LILCBRA
  • May 31, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
146
Other Auto Tech May 31, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?