• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

LS1 Vs LT1

  • Thread starter Thread starter D0cks
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last

bobbys9350

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
472
0
0
Apr 12, 2005
#21
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #21
eec4tuner said:
What about the ls-4 in the gto's?
Click to expand...
they have LS2, and ive HEARD over 400HP
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 12, 2005
#22
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #22
An ls1 with some cheap bolt ons and a cam is good for over 400rwhp.
 

darthcual

Member
Mar 31, 2005
985
19
18
Arlington, TX
Apr 12, 2005
#23
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #23
I have been beat and have beaten some camaros in my area and either way its good for me cuz if they hand me my azz well they got a bigger engine, and if i win, well they got a bigger engine. I love it when they ask me if I have a supercharger! The look on their faces when I say no, Priceless.
 

just4bob50

Active Member
Apr 2, 2005
504
5
28
Pa.
Apr 12, 2005
#24
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #24
near stock Ls1's with sticky tires and 6-spd can do high 12's
 

Gremlin5.0

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
5
0
0
Apr 12, 2005
#25
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #25
LS1's are wicked motors. my friend with a stock 2000 automagic with 140k miles. ran a 13.4.

I know heads/cam on those cars is out of this world.
 

mootang

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
907
0
0
texas
Apr 12, 2005
#26
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #26
the ls2 is a 6.0L engine
 

ALMOSTFINISHED

Member
Jan 8, 2004
315
0
17
Westchester County NY
Apr 12, 2005
#27
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #27
While everyone is on the topic of numbers, my friend has a 99 z28 auto, factory gearing and all. I installed an electric cutout and a lid and the car ran consistant 12.8's in the quarter, can even get the car sideways if you mash it doin about 60 mph. Fast car. I like em alot, thats why its on the list to get one pretty soon.

Nick
 

huRACEmentPSR

Banned
Apr 2, 2005
101
0
0
San Jose, CA
Apr 12, 2005
#28
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #28
ok....so i know that the 350 is gm's trademark motor. the 289/302 has always been fords mustang-based motor. gm however, has almost always had the 350, but ford stuck to a 302 until 96. then they downsized to a 4.6 mod motor. yes, that are great motors, but why downsize? imagine if they would have made the standard gt motors a 351 pushrod or mod? or even made the 5.4 mod standard. gm wouldnt have a chance
 

DarkMesa8

Founding Member
Oct 15, 2002
1,087
0
0
Orlando, FL
Apr 12, 2005
#29
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #29
huRACEmentPSR said:
ok....so i know that the 350 is gm's trademark motor. the 289/302 has always been fords mustang-based motor. gm however, has almost always had the 350, but ford stuck to a 302 until 96. then they downsized to a 4.6 mod motor. yes, that are great motors, but why downsize? imagine if they would have made the standard gt motors a 351 pushrod or mod? or even made the 5.4 mod standard. gm wouldnt have a chance
Click to expand...

Look what happens when you stick an expensive 350 or 346 into a pony car.

Where'd they go?

Mustangs have always outsold F-bodies, in the final years it was like 3-1.

Ford's modular motor cost a lot to research and develop, but look at the fleet of modular cars now. All GM can do is up their displacement in hopes to catch up with the GT's 5.4L. The 03/04 Cobra motor certainly laid waste to the LS1s with only 281 ci.

And don't give me this supercharger vs N/A crap. If its factory stock, its factory stock.
 

5o5speed

New Member
Aug 9, 2004
79
0
0
Apr 12, 2005
#30
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #30
I've also heard that Ls1 and Lt1's respond well to simple bolt-ons and cam swaps but you don't see too many of them that are supercharged because they don't respond to well.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 12, 2005
#31
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #31
DarkMesa8 said:
And don't give me this supercharger vs N/A crap. If its factory stock, its factory stock.
Click to expand...

If you put the highest model mustang (cobra) why not pair it against the highest model ls1? (Z06) They are both on equal playing fields and the Z06 would win. And that is motor vs supercharger.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Apr 12, 2005
#32
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #32
5o5speed said:
I've also heard that Ls1 and Lt1's respond well to simple bolt-ons and cam swaps but you don't see too many of them that are supercharged because they don't respond to well.
Click to expand...


Most ignorant comment I have heard in this thread so far. They respond really well to superchargers. Most people are happy with the 400rwhp+ street car that is all motor and can beat 99% of the cars on the road. LS1's with blowers and turbos are insane. I've seen the cars do 9's on the stock block, and they don't crack in half

The reason is they are more expensive. Not that they don't respond well.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Apr 12, 2005
#33
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #33
88_GT_5_oh said:
wish ford would have stuck with a the pushrod motor................ with those cars don't you have to drop the motor out under the car?
Click to expand...
hahah a dual over head can motor is way better than a push rod motor..............still a svt cobra motor 03+ will own either one..........
 
G

goinbigger

New Member
Apr 11, 2005
15
0
0
Apr 12, 2005
#34
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #34
Actually they have gotten up to 8.8's on a stock block.
Funny thing, first post. I am picking up a 91 gt this weekend. I wrecked my 98 z28 a few months ago. I was on here doing some research on what I could do to the new stang and came across this. If you want to know about the LS1, go to www.LS1tech.com there are some very, very sick cars on there and a wealth of info. One of my buddies was joking saying the first thing I should do with the stang is throw the LS1 I have in the garage in there, and get plates that say "bowtie". LOL Mine was a very fun car to drive. With a lid and a dynomax ultraflow mine made 340rwhp/360tq. Behind a t-56. Ran a 13.1 stock w/ a 2.0 short time. Then I put on longtubes and a 150 shot, never got the chance to dyno it. Ran a 12.8@118 I was scared of snapping the tiny 10 bolt so I never put any sticky tires on it. A guy in a vw golf cut me off and put me underneath a gaurdrail on my way to work one morning. So I bought a massive truck. I have been craving some speed lately so decided to pick up the stang. Going to need some work to get it to where the camaro was but that's half the fun of the sport! I'll be on here a lot researching parts. All that research on the camaro and now I have to start all over again. LOL oh well.
Later.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Apr 12, 2005
#35
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #35
To compare Z06 to any Mustang Cobra is like comparing a Viper or Ford GT to a SS... Definately not in the same class car.
Kevin
 
9

95GTAODE

New Member
Nov 25, 2004
200
2
0
Apr 12, 2005
#36
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #36
bluevenom867 said:
The LS1 is like the Ford Celveland of the early 70's,only with much more technology and a lot less wieght,and is made by GM.
Click to expand...


Blasphemy!
 

huRACEmentPSR

Banned
Apr 2, 2005
101
0
0
San Jose, CA
Apr 12, 2005
#37
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #37
DarkMesa8 said:
Look what happens when you stick an expensive 350 or 346 into a pony car.

Where'd they go?

Mustangs have always outsold F-bodies, in the final years it was like 3-1.

Ford's modular motor cost a lot to research and develop, but look at the fleet of modular cars now. All GM can do is up their displacement in hopes to catch up with the GT's 5.4L. The 03/04 Cobra motor certainly laid waste to the LS1s with only 281 ci.

And don't give me this supercharger vs N/A crap. If its factory stock, its factory stock.
Click to expand...

oh i fully agree with what youre saying. espically with the 03/04 cobras. they are i think .2 seconds slower than a zo6 vette in the 1/4, cost much less, can fit 4 or 5 people, sound way nicer, and look hands down better. all im saying is imagine how badly ford would waste GM IF there was a larger all aluminium motor. i think there would be no contest. thats all i was trying to say
 

Paul Perreca

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,085
0
0
Apr 12, 2005
#38
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #38
its still a camaro or a firebird lol
Not as cool as a mustang lol
 

huRACEmentPSR

Banned
Apr 2, 2005
101
0
0
San Jose, CA
Apr 12, 2005
#39
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #39
im with paul. IMHO i think f-bodies are hideous. GM could at least took some stlying cues from the classics......which by the way.....IMHO agian, were not nearly as nice looking as mustangs.
 

DarkMesa8

Founding Member
Oct 15, 2002
1,087
0
0
Orlando, FL
Apr 12, 2005
#40
  • Apr 12, 2005
  • #40
mackey said:
If you put the highest model mustang (cobra) why not pair it against the highest model ls1? (Z06) They are both on equal playing fields and the Z06 would win. And that is motor vs supercharger.
Click to expand...

I'll see your ZO6, and raise you a Ford GT.

The LS1 isn't in a Z06, the LS7 is.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 2 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
G
1983 GLX Convertible 5.0 5-Speed 4BBL 'Barn Find' - 82,000 original miles - Restoration Motivation Needed
  • Grande Luxe X-Factor
  • Oct 7, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 31, 2024
Mac131
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
C
Progress Thread 2004 Comp Orange GT
  • ctandc
  • Jun 26, 2023
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
56
Views
5K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 1, 2026
ctandc
C
Fox rear coil-over vs. traditional spring opinions
  • Waz900
  • Mar 5, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
9
Views
6K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 6, 2020
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?