• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Suspension LX springs on a GT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gs1987GT
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2020
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#1
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #1
Good morning,

I did a search with no results. I'm looking to replace my worn out OEM springs with stock replacements. The ride of my GT is pretty harsh, I'm not sure if that's due to the springs and suspension being worn out or not, but that's my observation. I'm replacing everything when I do the spring work.

Is there any reason I couldn't use LX convertible springs on my GT? Would the ride height be the same? I'm assuming the ride of the LX would be softer, if that's incorrect, please let me know and I'll just get some stock replacement GT springs.

This is strictly a cruiser, so I'm not interested in lowering springs. The car sits too low for my taste with the worn out springs.

Thanks for any thoughts you can share.

Sincerely,
Greg
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,083
21,267
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 3, 2020
#2
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #2
Get yourself some aftermarket progressive rate springs and OEM style set of shocks and struts.
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT and General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,939
224
Massachusetts
Jan 3, 2020
#3
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #3
A 5.0 LX would have the same springs as a GT. The 2.3L LX would have softer springs.

Main difference however is the weight of the vehicle changes the length of the spring a tiny bit. Ford put different springs in 5.0 convertibles than it did for 5.0 coupes. The differences is quite small, maybe an extra 1/4 of a coil to compensate for the extra 300-400 lbs in a convertible.
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT and General karthief

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,083
21,267
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 3, 2020
#4
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #4
Noobz347 said:
Get yourself some aftermarket progressive rate springs and OEM style set of shocks and struts.
Click to expand...


...And bushings! You likely need new rubber bushings all the way around.

Skip the poly bushings (or any other style) if you're after the smooth ride.
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT and General karthief

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#5
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #5
Thanks guys. Appreciate the help
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,643
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 3, 2020
#6
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #6
Honestly, if your ride is bad in a stock Foxbody, it's probably because everything is worn out. If soft ride is your game, I would just put new stock stuff in it. Could be worn out bushings, shocks, etc. Those cars don't ride hard from the factory.

Kurt
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#7
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #7
Absolutely. Thanks for your thoughts.
Yes looking for a softer ride. I'll give this some thought. Are there any decent rear control arms with rubber bushings? I like the BBKs but they are poly.

I don't want to beat up the torque boxes so I'd prefer rubber. If not I'll get the BBKs.

Thanks again
 

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#8
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #8
revhead347 said:
Honestly, if your ride is bad in a stock Foxbody, it's probably because everything is worn out. If soft ride is your game, I would just put new stock stuff in it. Could be worn out bushings, shocks, etc. Those cars don't ride hard from the factory.

Kurt
Click to expand...

That's what I was thinking too. The stock stuff is all original and the front springs are sagged at least 1.5 or more inches. So much that I have tire rub with the stock turbine wheel's

My plan is a full rebuild front and rear suspensions.

Thanks
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,301
1,643
214
Acworth, GA
Jan 3, 2020
#9
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #9
Gs87GT said:
That's what I was thinking too. The stock stuff is all original and the front springs are sagged at least 1.5 or more inches. So much that I have tire rub with the stock turbine wheel's

My plan is a full rebuild front and rear suspensions.

Thanks
Click to expand...

Glad we are on the same page. I agree with your assesment. Usually when the tires start rubbing it's a combination of spring wear, and control arm bushing wear. When that control arm bushing bolt gets closer to the edge, it rides harder, and the tires rub. You have to be realistic with cars that have been around longer than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Kurt
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,255
17,939
224
Massachusetts
Jan 3, 2020
#10
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #10
Mm sells rubber upper arms for the rear. Ford also sells new axle bushings in rubber. Mm has them too.

Rear Upper Control Arms, 1979-2004 Mustang

For the lower, not much options if you want rubber.

I’m partial to MM stuff.

Sport series Mustang Rear Lower Control Arms, 1979-1998

I realize it’s not cheap stuff
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#11
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #11
revhead347 said:
Glad we are on the same page. I agree with your assesment. Usually when the tires start rubbing it's a combination of spring wear, and control arm bushing wear. When that control arm bushing bolt gets closer to the edge, it rides harder, and the tires rub. You have to be realistic with cars that have been around longer than Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Kurt
Click to expand...


Lol agreed, thanks Sir. Yes and as I was over driving age when these cars were new, that makes me old too, hence my connection with and love for these cars.
 

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 3, 2020
#12
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #12
Mustang5L5 said:
Mm sells rubber upper arms for the rear. Ford also sells new axle bushings in rubber. Mm has them too.

Rear Upper Control Arms, 1979-2004 Mustang

For the lower, not much options if you want rubber.

I’m partial to MM stuff.

Sport series Mustang Rear Lower Control Arms, 1979-1998

I realize it’s not cheap stuff
Click to expand...
Sounds good, I'll check that stuff out. Thanks. I'm starting with the front, new lower control arms, struts, coil springs, spring insulators, sway bar frame bushings & end links.

Trans and engine mounts

Rear upper and lower control arms, springs, spring insulators, regular and quad shocks and axle bushings. Already ordered and have the MM kit to press them in and out.

Thanks

Once all that's done it's time to drop the trans and do the clutch and rear main engine seal.... then full exhaust....

Have a good weekend guys!
 
Reactions: General karthief

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
43,083
21,267
234
Box behind Walmart
Jan 3, 2020
#13
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #13
You probably should replace the lower control arms. They were never great to begin with.

Here's a source for some OEM style bushings. I see that the rubber ones are getting tougher to find.

93 1993 Ford Mustang Control Arm Bushing - Suspension - AC Delco, Centric, Delphi, Energy Suspension, Mevotech, Moog, TRW, Front, Front Lower, Front Lower Forward, Front Lower Rearward, Rear, Rear Upper, Rear Upper Rearward, Rear Upper To Axle, Rear

Buy a 1993 Ford Mustang Control Arm Bushing at discount prices. Choose top quality brands AC Delco, Centric, Delphi, Energy Suspension, Mevotech, Moog, TRW.
www.partsgeek.com
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Jan 3, 2020
#14
  • Jan 3, 2020
  • #14
There were many different springs installed at the factory. Sometimes LX 5.0L and GT springs were the same. Sometimes not. I can get a list.
 
Reactions: Gs1987GT and General karthief

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 4, 2020
#15
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #15
FoxChasis said:
There were many different springs installed at the factory. Sometimes LX 5.0L and GT springs were the same. Sometimes not. I can get a list.
Click to expand...


If you could, please, that'd be great. See this is the source of my confusion and this thread. When I began looking at springs, I saw listings, multiple different places for LX and GT convertible springs. I believe that LMR shows them this way and the GT springs have a half inch or so taller overall, unloaded height.

I'm not sure why that would be unless they are stiffer than the LX or because the GT is typically heavier than the LX? This car, as long as I have it will never be a track car, so I'm looking for a softer ride, as now it's harsh.

The thought that it's due to everything being 33 yrs old now and totally worn out is valid and it may be resolved by simply going back with stock parts. The car has a little over 60k on it, original miles, but the old saying "if mileage don't get it, age will" .... my car is the perfect example of that.

However, I figured it was worth asking here as although I think I know these cars fairly well, I sure don't know it all..... not by a long shot.

Thanks again guys. Have a good Saturday.
 
Last edited by a moderator: Jan 4, 2020

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 4, 2020
#16
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #16
Noobz347 said:
You probably should replace the lower control arms. They were never great to begin with.

Here's a source for some OEM style bushings. I see that the rubber ones are getting tougher to find.

93 1993 Ford Mustang Control Arm Bushing - Suspension - AC Delco, Centric, Delphi, Energy Suspension, Mevotech, Moog, TRW, Front, Front Lower, Front Lower Forward, Front Lower Rearward, Rear, Rear Upper, Rear Upper Rearward, Rear Upper To Axle, Rear

Buy a 1993 Ford Mustang Control Arm Bushing at discount prices. Choose top quality brands AC Delco, Centric, Delphi, Energy Suspension, Mevotech, Moog, TRW.
www.partsgeek.com
Click to expand...


Yes Sir, thanks. Yes, agreed, the lowers have flex issues so they will be replaced.
 
F

FoxChasis

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 23, 2003
589
276
93
Jan 4, 2020
#17
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #17
For 1987 model year 5.0L only....

I show the following spring codes and applications:

BBAA - LX coupe/manual
BBBB - GT hatchback/manual, LX hatchback/manual (late)
BBSS - LX coupe/manual, SSP/manual
KKFF - LX coupe/manual
OOAA - LX coupe/manual
OOSS - LX hatchback/manual (early)
PPBB - GT hatchback/auto & manual, GT convertible/manual, LX hatchback/auto & manual (late)
PPSS - GT hatchback/auto, LX coupe/auto (asc only) & manual, SSP/manual
PPTT - GT hatchback/auto & manual
QQCC - GT convertible/auto
RRBB - GT hatchback/auto, GT convertible/auto, LX convertible/auto (early)
RRCC - GT convertible/manual
RRSS - LX coupe/auto (SSP only)
RRTT - GT hatchback/auto, LX convertible/auto (late) & manual
 
Last edited: Jan 4, 2020

7991LXnSHO

wanna catch the space herp
10 Year Member
Sep 1, 2010
7,387
2,745
194
Kearney, NE
Jan 4, 2020
#18
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #18
The next thing to help with those codes would be spring rate and heights. I wonder if a TRW actual paper catalog has a chart in the back for that. In your situation, a softer spring with good height would be helpful.
New bushings and the right shock choice are critical. Monroe’s best ride shocks and struts are what I’d recommend to a customer. Take KYB off the table. They make some of the (cheap and high volume) OEM shocks, but the aftermarket ones have been pretty rough for a while. They gave our floating mini van a plumbing truck like ride. Which was ok fully loaded up as a band wagon, but not ok as a soccer or trip cruiser.
A thought on rear control arms and bushings - I have read where the Ford four links depend on some flex not to bind up. As you are not looking for drag strip times, reinforcing the stock arms with plates might be not only cheaper, but the best choice for ride quality with new bushings.
 
Last edited: Jan 4, 2020

Gs1987GT

Active Member
Sep 25, 2019
484
170
53
MidAtlantic
Jan 4, 2020
#19
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #19
Excellent info. Thanks y'all!
 

Blown88GT

Founding Member
Nov 13, 1999
2,283
524
164
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Jan 4, 2020
#20
  • Jan 4, 2020
  • #20
I did most of the suspension stuff 25 years ago.
I went with poly everywhere except the top of the rear UCA's & the front control arms.
With the Tokico 5-way adjustable shocks, you can tune the ride to your liking.
If my signature is displayed, all is there.
 
Last edited: Jan 5, 2020
Reactions: Gs1987GT
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
J
Foxbody mustang throttle body return spring
  • Jakub2537
  • May 18, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
128
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 18, 2026
86HO5.0
8
Paint and Body Rotten moon roof trim
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
136
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 15, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
808
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Fox Fuel Pump Issues After Replacement/Upgrade
  • Ryu
  • Jun 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
558
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2026
Ryu
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?