• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

LX tailpipes on a GT ???

  • Thread starter Thread starter gregpro50
  • Start date Start date Dec 21, 2004

gregpro50

Member
Sep 11, 2004
140
0
16
Binghamton NY
Dec 21, 2004
#1
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #1
Here's the deal. I have a new flowmaster 2 1/2" catback system with stainless tips that I bought to use on an LX project I never finished. Now my '92 GT needs the pipes. I have seen guys either use a cobra bumper or hog out holes in the factory bumper to fit the LX pipes but I dont want to do that. I have seen guys fab a drop bracket for the rear hangers to drop the pipes below the rear bumper and it looks good, but I am just worried about the pipes will be interfering with the rear end. Especially if the car is going to be lowered. I was just wondering if anyone else has done this and how it worked out.
 
G

ghostkilla

New Member
Dec 5, 2004
4
1
0
Between LACR & Willowsprings
Dec 21, 2004
#2
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #2
In my opinion the classic look of chrome tips on early GTs and LX's are unbeatable. Even with holes cut in a GT bumper it doesnt give the awesome side look of the LX's and it looks better than lower the tail pipes which may scrape on upgrades or if you ever get the car towed.
 
Reactions: Scrapla347

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Dec 21, 2004
#3
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #3
I would just spend the extra cash and get the cobra rear bumper to go with it. I personally think the Lx pipes on a GT no matter what way you have it looks like Crap. But on a Lx or Cobra they look SIC.
 

nito88stang

Founding Member
May 23, 2002
2,012
0
46
Fullerton, California
Dec 21, 2004
#4
  • Dec 21, 2004
  • #4
cobra bumper is the only way to do it, any other way just looks like a hack job IMO

 

Legendary

Founding Member
Oct 10, 2002
1,925
0
0
City of Angels
Dec 22, 2004
#5
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #5
nito88stang said:
cobra bumper is the only way to do it, any other way just looks like a hack job IMO
Click to expand...


AGREED!

 

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Dec 22, 2004
#6
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #6
it can be done without "hacking" the rear valance. i happen to think that mine is tastefully done.

 

Goldmember

Member
Oct 23, 2004
118
0
16
Southen California
Dec 22, 2004
#7
  • Dec 22, 2004
  • #7
Ive seen it on a few gt's with both the holes in the gt cover and under the cover. If you install the under you will be scraping everywhere, especially when lowered. The holes on the gt cover look way crappy. Best would be to get a cobra bumper cover and call it a day plus it would look nice.
 

Wil

New Member
Jan 2, 2003
581
0
0
Burke, VA
Dec 23, 2004
#8
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #8
go for the cobra rear!!!
 

gregpro50

Member
Sep 11, 2004
140
0
16
Binghamton NY
Dec 23, 2004
#9
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #9
axeman said:
it can be done without "hacking" the rear valance. i happen to think that mine is tastefully done.

Click to expand...


That is exactly what I was thinking . I think that looks very tasteful. I cant see having any problem with it scraping (unless I can stand it up that far). How did you fab the brackets to drop them down lower ??
 

_jb_

New Member
Mar 4, 2004
808
0
0
Michigan, Berrien County
Dec 23, 2004
#10
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #10
I vote get a Cobra rear effect. But do not cut into the GT effects since it always looks like a ****ty job.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Dec 23, 2004
#11
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #11
gregpro50 said:
That is exactly what I was thinking . I think that looks very tasteful. I cant see having any problem with it scraping (unless I can stand it up that far). How did you fab the brackets to drop them down lower ??
Click to expand...

That car looks a little higher in the back then stock. If you lift the back of the car a little it might look good. But if youhave to back down a drive way on a slant or pull out of a parking lot your definately gonna srape. Just get the cobra rear and youll love it.
 

axeman

Founding Member
Feb 9, 2001
1,348
0
36
Elizabethtown, PA
Dec 23, 2004
#12
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #12
personally, i vote for the cobra rear too. but, i couldn't afford to do that at the time, so the result is what you see. one of these years when i get the car painted, i'll get the cobra rear valance and a cowl hood to go along with it. but for now, i think it looks pretty good.

actually, the rear is ~1" higher because of the 28" tires. at the time of that picture the front was lowered, but when i put the big tires on i ended up raising the front to stock. now it sits pretty level.

i do not have a problem with scraping, but i bet a car that was a little lower would scrape once in a while in odd situations.

for me, it was a pretty simple install. i have mac exhaust with ball and socket joints. the tailpipes bolt on after the axle, unlike the rest of the companies that bolt on before. all i had to do was angle the tailpipes down and tighten down the bolts. the rest of the cat-back exhaust stays put (no clearence issues with the axle). to finish it off, all i did was bought 2 more of the rubber hangers for the tailpipes to hang at the correct heigth. project finished.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Dec 23, 2004
#13
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #13
My call is for the Cobra rear. IMHO at GT stang with holes cut in the rear fascia just looks like ass. But its your car.
 

DirtyD916

Active Member
May 25, 2003
804
1
38
Norcal 916
Dec 23, 2004
#14
  • Dec 23, 2004
  • #14
although AXEMAN's GT looks that best out of al the stock bumper tail pipes i have seen, i would still suggest getting the cobra bumper. i think that they are pretty rear to see as not many people have them and the look of the pipes stabbing through is unbeatable. For $220 and a some more to prep its not TOO expensive but IMO its well worth the cost.
 
T

TheUser

Active Member
Jul 25, 2003
1,859
1
36
Springfield, MO
Dec 24, 2004
#15
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #15
as far as I can tell, you can't see the tailpipes too much w/ the cobra bumper either, just the ends. LX 5.0's look better as far as the rear end goes IMO.
 
D

Darkhorse845

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
101
0
0
Las Vegas,Nevada
Dec 24, 2004
#16
  • Dec 24, 2004
  • #16
You can get the Cobra rear bumper cover
at www.50resto.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
496
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
G
Fox Tire Size for 16" Pony Wheels on 1984 LX Convertible
  • gw7
  • Jun 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
85
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 24, 2026
Mustang5L5
Tailpipes under a Fox GT Bumper?
  • AnthonyA1234
  • Feb 13, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
44
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 20, 2025
limp
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
The Dilemma! 1988 LX 5.0
  • TTSaleen
  • Sep 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
329
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 11, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?