• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Mach 1 questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter weldonGT
  • Start date Start date Sep 27, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

weldonGT

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
100
0
0
Florida
Sep 27, 2004
#1
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #1
I have a 2004 GT that has 6500 miles on it. I very happy with the car but now have a chance to get a 2003 mach 1. Can someone please give me the particulars on the 2003 mach 1 as far as the differences between a mach 1 and a GT. BTW, the 2003 mach 1 only has 6000 miles. I've done some searching here on the forums and I think I have a good grasp of the mach 1.

I guess I don't have to ask if I should go with the 03 mach 1 over my current 04 GT
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Sep 27, 2004
#2
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #2
This should answer most of the questions...

http://www.mach1registry.com/Specs/Specs.htm
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Sep 27, 2004
#3
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #3
Basically it's a bigger engine and limited production. It has a shaker hood (ram air), different exhaust, 3.55 gearing, different suspension, different rims, small interior accents (which you may have on your GT already).

I'd do it!!!
4V
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Sep 27, 2004
#4
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #4
JonJon said:
Basically it's a bigger engine
Click to expand...

It's the same displacement though the heads are DOHC 4v and physically larger then the SOHC 2v heads on the GT.
 

TR03Mach1

Member
May 31, 2002
450
0
16
New Castle, Delaware USA
Sep 27, 2004
#5
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #5
Marks5.0! said:
4v motor, functional hood scoop, better seats, 3.55 gears, retro instrument cluster, black hood stripe, side stripes and spoiler. thats all i can think of right now, im sure if i messed something someone will add it
Click to expand...

To add to the list: Brembo brakes 13" in front 11" in rear, Tokico shocks and struts, different springs (lower the car 1/2" over stock GT, Heritage 17" rims, different front and rear sway bars.
 

Marks5.0!

Founding Member
Jan 27, 2000
640
2
0
San Antonio, TX
Sep 27, 2004
#6
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #6
4v motor, functional hood scoop, better seats, 3.55 gears, retro instrument cluster, black hood stripe, side stripes and spoiler. thats all i can think of right now, im sure if i messed something someone will add it
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Sep 27, 2004
#7
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #7
The hood scoop doesn't really do much more than route cooler air to the filter. The intake is pretty much stock GT up to the box where it connects to the tubing that runs to the scoop. If you've looked under the hood you'll know it's impossible to get any real ram air effect. But damn it's fun to rev the engine and watch the hood shake
 

weldonGT

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
100
0
0
Florida
Sep 27, 2004
#8
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #8
Thanks for the replys. I just got back from test driving and I think I'm going to go with the mach 1. Damn it is nice to hear that v8 rev to over 6k. I'll post when it is parked in my garage.
thanks again.
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Sep 27, 2004
#9
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #9
The sway bars are the same as a GT.

Why not mod the GT? IMO the GT's look better and can be just as fast for very little money.
 

kirkyg

Founding Member
Jun 14, 2002
3,568
1
56
Beaumont, TX
Sep 27, 2004
#10
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #10
better suspension...

They are considerably faster than a GT...

kirkyg
 

01GT eibach

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,075
0
36
Pittsburgh, PA
Sep 27, 2004
#11
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #11
codyGT said:
... IMO the GT's look better ...
Click to expand...
Mach 1's have the shaker hood, grill delete, lower ride height, and chin spoiler. Those items look far better than a stock GT. However, I have never been a big fan of the Mach 1 rims or the black spoiler.
 
0

01mgvert

New Member
Jan 12, 2004
302
0
0
Sep 27, 2004
#12
  • Sep 27, 2004
  • #12
codyGT said:
Why not mod the GT? IMO the GT's look better and can be just as fast for very little money.
Click to expand...

A stock Mach was dynoed by Hot Rod magazine. It produced 280 rwhp. That's 333 bhp, not the under-rated 305 bhp advertised by Ford. I've added over $2000 in bolt-on mods (not including labor) onto my GT and I am now up to 260 rwhp. It will take more than a few mods for a GT to beat a Mach I.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Sep 28, 2004
#13
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #13
Just curious, how much of a premium are you paying for the Mach 1 over your '04 GT? Or is it an even swap?
 

weldonGT

New Member
Jul 15, 2004
100
0
0
Florida
Sep 28, 2004
#14
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #14
Gearbanger 101 said:
Just curious, how much of a premium are you paying for the Mach 1 over your '04 GT? Or is it an even swap?
Click to expand...

It was nearly an even swap. The Mach 1 has 6700miles and my 04 GT had 6600 miles (give or take fifty or so). Since the interest rates went up by half a point since I got my 04 my payments went up a few bucks, but other than that...I'm ridin' in a 03 Mach 1 as of 6:30pm last night.

I'm loving this car...the engine feels smoother, the build quality seems better, this is the way I think GT's should be, but the Mach 1 is so much better than my 04 GT was. I didn't think there would be this much difference, but WOW!
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Sep 28, 2004
#15
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #15
That RWHP was most likely on a Mustang dyno.

If they really had 330hp I wouldn't be able to smoke them so easy in my 00 SS.

Most numbers (SAE) for Mach1s are in the low 260s. With my mods I can easily take my friend Daren's Mach1 to 60 and anything after that is a dead heat. He has a MAC H and weld-ins.
 

MineralgreyGT01

New Member
Jun 23, 2002
519
0
0
Normal, Illinois
Sep 28, 2004
#16
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #16
codyGT said:
Most numbers (SAE) for Mach1s are in the low 260s.
Click to expand...

Well maybe for the automatic Mach 1. I would not generalize the numbers if you are not sure.
 
C

CatmanJJ

Captain Tangnet
20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 5, 2002
4,379
1
68
Maryland
Sep 28, 2004
#17
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #17
News flash!!! Mach 1s can be modded as well. Gears, shifter, tires, exhaust and you'll be rollin. I thought we were comparing GT and Mach. Where'd the SS come from, you always gotta throw that one in there doncha
 

TR03Mach1

Member
May 31, 2002
450
0
16
New Castle, Delaware USA
Sep 28, 2004
#18
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #18
codyGT said:
That RWHP was most likely on a Mustang dyno.

If they really had 330hp I wouldn't be able to smoke them so easy in my 00 SS.

Most numbers (SAE) for Mach1s are in the low 260s. With my mods I can easily take my friend Daren's Mach1 to 60 and anything after that is a dead heat. He has a MAC H and weld-ins.
Click to expand...

Yeah, and you need to lay off the crack pipe! MOST stock Mach 1's dyno on a DynoJet in the 270-290rwhp range. This is my pretty much stock Mach 1 dyno. With the simple addition of a Magnaflow o/r x-pipe, it jumped to the numbers in my sig.

 

Attachments

  • Mach1Dyno_2.webp
    35.1 KB · Views: 113

Zinc03GT

New Member
Apr 21, 2004
241
0
0
Mass
Sep 28, 2004
#19
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #19
codyGT said:
That RWHP was most likely on a Mustang dyno.

If they really had 330hp I wouldn't be able to smoke them so easy in my 00 SS.

Most numbers (SAE) for Mach1s are in the low 260s. With my mods I can easily take my friend Daren's Mach1 to 60 and anything after that is a dead heat. He has a MAC H and weld-ins.
Click to expand...

If that was on a Mustang dyno it would be sick. Mustang dynos give lower rwhp readings than dyno-jets. Most auto Machs are in the 250-260 range on the dyno-jet, but the 5 speeds are 270-280 (and some monsters have pulled 290s).
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Sep 28, 2004
#20
  • Sep 28, 2004
  • #20
Well what ever they have, a GT can easily keep up with a little $.

Then again I guess a couple of " smart " people over at Mach1registry also couldn't tell a difference in power when some of them test drove a Cobra.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
47
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
S
Engine 2003 Mach 1 Automatic Upgrades assistance
  • SJK1417M1AT
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
252
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 21, 2025
01SVTvertt
0
O
Manual to Auto Mach 1 Swap
  • Osnick
  • Mar 16, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
438
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 27, 2025
Osnick
O
D
Need help for my PCM Mach1
  • Danaololo
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
158
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jul 30, 2025
Danaololo
D
6
New Member 1969 Mach 1
  • 69Resto
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
152
The Welcome Wagon Sep 19, 2025
69Resto
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?