• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

mallory distributor

  • Thread starter Thread starter vsj100
  • Start date Start date Sep 6, 2024

vsj100

Member
Feb 29, 2024
3
3
13
95112
Sep 6, 2024
#1
  • Sep 6, 2024
  • #1
Mine is a 1966 289 C. It has a stock distributor and today I checked the points and they were a bit fried. I surfaced them and that made an improvement. I picked up a Mallory
YL-551-HP today so I will give it a try. What are your thoughts about this Mallory?
I also picked up a stock aluminum 4 bb manifold so I plan to switch to a 4 barrel. What do you think about that and about Holley 450 or 600 or 650 ?


Thanks,
Scott
 
Reactions: Potomus Pete and 89ripper

89ripper

Founding Member
Jun 3, 2002
926
308
103
Rockford, Illinois
Sep 7, 2024
#2
  • Sep 7, 2024
  • #2
Well I cant really give you any pointers about your setup but that car looks hot! Wheels look great on that!
 
Reactions: Realmongo

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,944
2,898
194
Middle of Maine
Sep 7, 2024
#3
  • Sep 7, 2024
  • #3
A 450 cfm Holley 4bbl is a waste of time and effort. Most 2bbl carbs on Ford V-8 engines were 500 cfm.
Nothing wrong with a larger carb. It just needs to be jetted correctly for the needs of the engine. If done so correctly, it will work just fine.
Example: If a engine uses 600 cfm of air, and a 750 cfm carb is installed and jetted correctly, it will run just fine, the extra 150 cfm of available capacity of the carb will never be used.
Think about it. When a 500 cfm carb is on a engine, and the engine is only using 200 cfm of air (part throttle), does the car run rich? No, it is jetted to provide the right amount of fuel for the air entering the engine.
Same holds true for a carb that can provide more fuel/air than the engine can use at WOT.
 
Reactions: 89ripper

Realmongo

I prefer to be called "Evil Genius"
Founding Member
Oct 10, 2001
2,468
86
99
Western Mass
Sep 7, 2024
#4
  • Sep 7, 2024
  • #4
The stock 1966 289 2V Autolite has 1.14 venturis and was rated at 300 CFM. You don't want to go too large on a stock to mild 289 or your drivability and fuel milage will suck. Believe me, I know (been there done that). You'd probably be happier with something like a 500 CFM Edelbrock. Remember, the stock 289 Autolite 4V from Ford was only 480 CFM and that extremely mild camshaft in your engine will not crank out high RPMs.
The distributor will run well, but it does not have vacuum advance, so that will hurt your mileage.
 
Reactions: 89ripper
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
B
studder/miss on 289 on hard(er) acceleration
  • Bristang5
  • Sep 18, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
308
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2024
jonbearman
J
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
D
Engine 85 GT Backfires through Carb
  • DienstXIV
  • Oct 3, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
19
Views
581
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 7, 2025
85GTStangGuy
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?