• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Man I just got SMOKEby an '98 Camaro LS1

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Green GT
  • Start date Start date Nov 25, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Nov 25, 2006
#1
  • Nov 25, 2006
  • #1
He was pulling on me pretty hard. Would gears get me closer to him. He has an auto and he "says" the motor is stock, but that thing was really fast. I made a video but my friend dosent know how to keep the camera on the road. Plus Id get bitched at.

But do you think gears will allow me to keep up with him? Maybe throw some NO2 in the mix?
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Nov 25, 2006
#2
  • Nov 25, 2006
  • #2
gears would help, some no2 would get you closer
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Nov 25, 2006
#3
  • Nov 25, 2006
  • #3
Since you were at the "track" when you raced....................................
the 94 LT1 that whipped me had 3:73's and after market rockers and CAI.....it took the H/C/I and supporting mods to get him.........I have him by a second now but he is making some upgrades over the winter..............
 

OrangeMustangGt

Founding Member
Mar 7, 2002
1,976
0
36
Cape Cod, MA
Nov 26, 2006
#4
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #4
ls1's are fast. even the auto's...gm knows how to make a decent auto(i hate to say that) Gears wont help you....his massive 350cu and great flowing stock heads. etc puts a hurt on a poor stock 5.0.

Nitrous, boost, or a good h/c/i are your only reprieve.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Nov 26, 2006
#5
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #5
On my local "track" 1st and 2nd are pretty even because it's hard to get a good launch here. After that, I had him by about 3 lengths.

It'll take at least H/C/I or boost to run with stockish LS1's.
 

illwood

Member
Apr 3, 2004
636
1
19
Worcester, MA
Nov 26, 2006
#6
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #6
LT1 - good engine by Chevy. easy to mod. (even easy to tune the ECU).

LS1 - even better engine by Chevy. Good design & lightweight (aluminum block). Not an easy car to pull on.

Too bad (for Chevy) the build quality of the LT1 and LS1 F bodies was poor.
 

Zero Signal

Active Member
Feb 24, 2003
2,633
2
46
Tucson, AZ
Nov 26, 2006
#7
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #7
You basically need a built motor or boost to keep up with them, we have so many disadvantages under them. Stock for stock they weight about 150-200lbs less, they have as much power as a decent H/C/I (302) mustang and have torque-arm/panhard bar rearend system so they have much better traction. I could be wrong on this, but I think they have a 3.42 rearend(?). Find an LS1 with a cam and some bolt-ons and you'll need to be running a 331 or 347 stroker, sticky tires, better gearing and good driving. It's just tough going against something that will push 400rwhp N/A.
 

Guero

Active Member
Oct 11, 2005
2,148
0
47
Nov 26, 2006
#8
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #8
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2a1d31d4-5095-4955-8f65-985d012ebcbb.htm

Is you both are good drivers, it will take more than a 75 shot and bolt ons.
 

trav_19

New Member
Oct 29, 2006
810
0
0
Jackson, MI
Nov 26, 2006
#9
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #9
haha i hate it so much!!! i got a buddy who always make coments to me that chevys are better and that his vette could whip my mustangs and im like hello your got a 350 i got a 302....there a major diff right there im like go get a 305 camaro and you can talk crap if you want....hes not even in the same class as me...im not gonna go buy a viper and run my mouth to him ....i guess i just dont get it.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Nov 26, 2006
#10
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #10
Buy my nitrous and call it a day. Not that I would recommend street racing at all.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Nov 26, 2006
#11
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #11
Just to clarify, the LSx engines are 346ci.

Also, to give you an idea of how the modded ones run, there's a guy around here that installed Patroit Performance stage II LS6 heads, LS6 intake, and comp cam 228/234dur 588/598lift, with exhaust and other supporting mods. He put down 405hp to the wheels on a mustang dyno, and he's run a best of 11.71@119 so far.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Nov 26, 2006
#12
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #12
Here's my question to you all...Is it the short block that is so killer on those cars? Or is it the stock heads? What is it that makes them so advanced? Ignition system?

A block is just a block right?? There's nothing special you can do to a short block to make a car faster other than cubic inches. That leaves the heads intake cam and ignition.

How come they have 40 CI more and get close to 100more rwhp?
 
S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned
Mar 31, 2005
991
1
0
Philly
Nov 26, 2006
#13
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #13
Pokageek said:
Here's my question to you all...Is it the short block that is so killer on those cars? Or is it the stock heads? What is it that makes them so advanced? Ignition system?

A block is just a block right?? There's nothing special you can do to a short block to make a car faster other than cubic inches. That leaves the heads intake cam and ignition.

How come they have 40 CI more and get close to 100more rwhp?
Click to expand...

I remember seeing something about LS engines utilizing very high volumetric efficiency...like
when the intake valve closes, the air pushes back to the intake, and bounces back down to the valve, and at that precise moment the valve is opened.
I'm probably just making all of this up though.
 
9

95five-oh

New Member
Jun 25, 2006
158
0
0
Mount Airy, MD
Nov 26, 2006
#14
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #14
My friend has a '99 Camaro SS, the only mods are headers and an slp lid, and it is almost as fast as my dad's freind's c5 Vette, i've driven both. It'd not even in the same league as a mildly modded 302. Don't forget that the f-body LS1 is basically the same engine that the standard (non z06) corvette c5 had...minus the true dual exhaust and better air intake.
 
B

bimmertech

New Member
May 3, 2005
1,123
0
0
merriam, ks
Nov 26, 2006
#15
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #15
Synned said:
I remember seeing something about LS engines utilizing very high volumetric efficiency...like
when the intake valve closes, the air pushes back to the intake, and bounces back down to the valve, and at that precise moment the valve is opened.
I'm probably just making all of this up though.
Click to expand...

close, what you are talking about is called wave pulse tuning--not VE although wave pulse tuning has a direct effect on VE.

having said that the LS1 operates on a 2nd pulse where as our beloved 5.0 operates on a 3rd pulse.

the heads on LS1's are superfantistico. great flow, velocity, really low burn time, etc...


as for saying a block is just a block, there is alot you can do to a block to make more power. for instance the diff between an LS1 block and an LS6 block is very slight(mostly revised ventilation passages) and is reported to make as much as a 15hp diff---thats the same crank, rods, pistons, heads, cam, etc, only diff is block.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Nov 26, 2006
#16
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #16
bimmertech said:
close, what you are talking about is called wave pulse tuning--not VE although wave pulse tuning has a direct effect on VE.

having said that the LS1 operates on a 2nd pulse where as our beloved 5.0 operates on a 3rd pulse.

the heads on LS1's are superfantistico. great flow, velocity, really low burn time, etc...


as for saying a block is just a block, there is alot you can do to a block to make more power. for instance the diff between an LS1 block and an LS6 block is very slight(mostly revised ventilation passages) and is reported to make as much as a 15hp diff---thats the same crank, rods, pistons, heads, cam, etc, only diff is block.
Click to expand...

That makes sense - although I don't exactly understand al you said.. Gotta admit, sounds like you know your stuff man.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
Nov 26, 2006
#17
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #17
lsx are no joke


haha which is why I am working on acquiring an ls1 rx-7

I still like the sound of mustangs the best.

Anyone else think lsx engines sound like garbage disposals
 

MattZ281LE

Founding Member
Feb 6, 2000
345
1
19
Purcellville, Va
Nov 26, 2006
#18
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #18
Stock......down to the tires with stock air filter and 700 miles on the od. I ran a 13.2 @ 106 with my 99 Z28 (orange)

Same track similar conditions my 95 GT ran 13.1 @ 105 with full H/C/I

The LS style motors pull HARD up top. They revised the cams in 00 or 01 to give them a little more tq under the curve. Slightly soft off the line, a set of 4.10's fixes that though.

a stock or few bolt on LS1 -VS- a HCI 5.0 is a drivers race in the 1/4. The 5.0 will almost always be on top in the 1/8th. After that on comes the 3rd gear pull in the LS1.

 

Attachments

  • Mustand2x1LEs1.webp
    33 KB · Views: 144

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
Nov 26, 2006
#19
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #19
I cant beleive Ford would do this to us.
 

drakesdad

Member
Jul 29, 2005
961
0
16
Oregon OHIO
Nov 26, 2006
#20
  • Nov 26, 2006
  • #20
MattZ281LE said:
Stock......down to the tires with stock air filter and 700 miles on the od. I ran a 13.2 @ 106 with my 99 Z28 (orange)

Same track similar conditions my 95 GT ran 13.1 @ 105 with full H/C/I

The LS style motors pull HARD up top. They revised the cams in 00 or 01 to give them a little more tq under the curve. Slightly soft off the line, a set of 4.10's fixes that though.

a stock or few bolt on LS1 -VS- a HCI 5.0 is a drivers race in the 1/4. The 5.0 will almost always be on top in the 1/8th. After that on comes the 3rd gear pull in the LS1.

Click to expand...
:OT: Matt...what major city are you by?
 

Attachments

  • Mustand2x1LEs1.webp
    33 KB · Views: 149
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
46
Views
3K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 16, 2026
Noobz347
S
65 Coupe I6 Auto to 302 EFI 5 Speed Swap
  • Scuderia
  • Feb 3, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 9, 2025
Noobz347
Betty white budget build
  • Stevenmverrill
  • Jun 16, 2023
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 15, 2023
2Blue2
98 GT PI Swapped Engine Fires, Dies Immediately NOT PATS
  • MMccPerformance
  • Dec 2, 2023
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
2K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 20, 2023
Yel2002GTAuto
Y
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?