• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

MAX H.P. WITH 30LB. INJECTORS?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aod92
  • Start date Start date Feb 22, 2007

aod92

New Member
Jun 4, 2005
104
0
0
Feb 22, 2007
#1
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #1
I was wondering the max hp i can get with my 30 lb. injectors? The rest of the fuel system is a 255 lph intank pump,and a kirban regulator. I'm installing a master power 70mm turbo and looking to make around 550 rwhp. Would i be maxed out with the 30's or do i need to jump to 42's to be safe? The car also has ported tfs twisted wedge heads,anderson b31 cam and a trickflow intake with a bunch of other bolt on's Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 22, 2007
#2
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #2
Without an FMU you'll be maxing out those 30lb injectors under 400 rwhp. 42lb injectors will be good up to 500-600rwhp depending on fuel pressure. The 42's will suit you fine but will leave no room to grow. Also be advised that if your still on the stock 5.0 block…your going to be walking on eggshells with that much h/p.
 

aod92

New Member
Jun 4, 2005
104
0
0
Feb 22, 2007
#3
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #3
millhouse said:
Without an FMU you'll be maxing out those 30lb injectors under 400 rwhp. 42lb injectors will be good up to 500-600rwhp depending on fuel pressure. The 42's will suit you fine but will leave no room to grow. Also be advised that if your still on the stock 5.0 block…your going to be walking on eggshells with that much h/p.
Click to expand...

Its on a stockblock with a dss girdle. Dss tells me i should be safe to about 650hp. Does that sound right?
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Feb 22, 2007
#4
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #4
aod92 said:
Its on a stockblock with a dss girdle. Dss tells me i should be safe to about 650hp. Does that sound right?
Click to expand...

That sound about right for what they "claim". It isn't true however...and I wouldn't trust it to be reliable past 450rwhp. Once you start pushing it much past that it's a crap shoot with reliability.
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Feb 22, 2007
#5
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #5
aod92 said:
Its on a stockblock with a dss girdle. Dss tells me i should be safe to about 650hp. Does that sound right?
Click to expand...

The only thing that girdle is going to do is hold the block together when it does split I say around 550 at the most.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Feb 22, 2007
#6
  • Feb 22, 2007
  • #6
Injector HP ratings: divide flow rating by.5 and multiply the result by the number of injectors. This uses a 100% duty cycle. These ratings are for naturally aspirated engines.

Example:
19/.5 = 38, 38 x 8 = 304 HP
24/.5 = 48, 48 x 8 = 384 HP
30/.5 = 60, 60 x 8 = 480 HP

The preferred duty cycle is about 85% maximum, so for a safety factor multiply the final figure times .85.

304 HP x .85 = 258 HP
385 HP x .85 = 326 HP
480 HP x .85 = 408 HP

Remember that the above ratings are at 39 PSI. Increasing the pressure will effectively increase the flow rating. Example: a 19 lb injector will flow 24 lbs at 63 PSI, and a 24 lb injector will flow 30 lbs at 63 PSI.

See http://users.erols.com/srweiss/ to get the calculators used in these examples.
 

Metalcop

Active Member
Jun 6, 2004
148
1
28
New Hampshire
May 18, 2007
#7
  • May 18, 2007
  • #7
Does it hurt anything to have a bigger injector than necessary, so that you will have enough injector/duty cycle as you build your combination? Right now my car dynoed at 275 rwhp, so I am outside of my preferred duty cycle. I did the math, same equations as above, and my goal is 400 rwhp, eventually. I purchased 30# injectors to achieve this goal. Obviously, I don't need the 30#'s right now, but I will in the future. Driveability is my main concern, I'm hoping there will be no difference with the 30#'s, there will just be more duty cycle and lbs of fuel available, but not utilized?!
 
D

Daggar

New Member
Jul 19, 2004
3,902
5
0
May 18, 2007
#8
  • May 18, 2007
  • #8
It doesn't "hurt" exactly but does make low speed tuning for drivability a bit more difficult.
 

Metalcop

Active Member
Jun 6, 2004
148
1
28
New Hampshire
May 18, 2007
#9
  • May 18, 2007
  • #9
I have a PMS with the start up tunes from Anderson. All that is 'suggested' is to add timing (+6) at idle. No fuel subtraction, or changes made to air or idle control.

Here is my setup:

Stock block, heads intake
Vortech w/6lbs boost
65mm TB
Off-road exhaust, smog delete
19# injectors
Vortech FMU/19#
AFM Power pipe
3.55 gears

I am adding, today: (!)

30# injectors
recal FMU 30#
80mm MAF/30#
Adjustable FP regulator Aeromotive
Fuel pressure gauge
boost gauge
190 lph Ford fuel pump

Obviously, this is more than I need for my current setup, but I want to plan for the future, which included a good H/C/I package, looking for 400 rwhp (or slightly less) eventually, so I wanted to 'prepare' for these upgrades by building up my fuel/air delivery system. Rick Anderson has provided me a tune for after I install these upgrades. Again, idle is not really touched, just +6 for timing. Right now my car runs really well, I don't drive it too hard, and according to the PMS, my injector duty cycle is pretty low. Should I even bother with these upgrades or just hold off until I actually install the hci? Thanks!
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
May 18, 2007
#10
  • May 18, 2007
  • #10
1 million H.P.
 

Metalcop

Active Member
Jun 6, 2004
148
1
28
New Hampshire
May 18, 2007
#11
  • May 18, 2007
  • #11
Thanks for your intelligent reply, that really helps me a lot!

 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
May 18, 2007
#12
  • May 18, 2007
  • #12
Metalcop said:
Thanks for your intelligent reply, that really helps me a lot!

Click to expand...

your welcome. your question was already pretty much answered i just figured i would throw that in for laughs. guess it didnt work.
 
Reactions: shroomhauler

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
May 18, 2007
#13
  • May 18, 2007
  • #13
100....................................BILLION..............................H.P. ?
 

BK_CAULEY

it's built for speed not longevity, woman
Dec 26, 2006
0
10
49
Thomasville, ga
May 18, 2007
#14
  • May 18, 2007
  • #14
he is gonna flame you for that one. 1 billion ...that was so un-intelligent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
378
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
A
SOLD For Sale: 1993 Ford Mustang Cobra Modified
  • anjteal93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
13
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 26, 2025
Mindseye007
Fuel 19lbs EV6 fuel injectors, what fuel pressure???
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 11, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 6 7 8
Replies
144
Views
11K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 25, 2024
PonyGTrider
B
Help me price my car to sell
  • Bkernan24
  • Oct 13, 2020
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
6
Views
2K
What is it Worth?!?!? Oct 15, 2020
Bkernan24
B
M
Mag’s 86 Vert build thread
  • magnum517
  • Mar 8, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 9, 2020
magnum517
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?