• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

May switch intakes-Victor, RPM II or Holley?

  • Thread starter Thread starter VibrantRedGT
  • Start date Start date Oct 12, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
55
Boca Raton, Florida
www.mustangworks.com
Oct 12, 2005
#1
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #1
Check sig for combo. Victor maybe overkill since it's a 4000rpm-7000rpm runner type. The Holley is very nice and makes power from 2000-6500. The RPM II maybe a bit perfect for my combo, 1500-6500 rpm.

Any thoughts?
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Oct 12, 2005
#2
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #2
I think MM&FF did a shootout between almost all the intakes, I'll look for the article, it might be on their webpage too.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
55
Boca Raton, Florida
www.mustangworks.com
Oct 12, 2005
#3
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #3
Sig didn't work.

347 9:5:1 Compression, Probe rotating assembly
AFR 185's unported
Comp Custom Cam .533/.544
Probe 1.6 stud mount rockers
Edelbrock RPM Intake
BBK 70MM TB
30Lb injectors
Pro-M 80MM Mass Air
4 Inch homemade powerpipe
1 3/4 Ceramic Long Tube Headers
3 Inch Prochamber
3 Inch cat back
P.M.S Tuned
3:55 gears at the present time, 4:10's later with rear rebuild.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
42
San Diego
Oct 12, 2005
#4
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #4
Ive heard nothing but great things about the RPM II. I would go that way, but im gonna get my Performer RPM Lower ported by TMOSS
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 12, 2005
#5
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #5
RPM II for this application. I don't think your cam is big enugh to support a victor efi intake, nor do you have near enough compression. You're using probe srs flat tops right? Should be over 10:1 with a 58cc head. What thickness head gasket you using and is the block zero deck?

The rpm with ported lower might work good for your application as well. Though with the right cam, the rpm II will spank it from here to kingdom come The victor is an awesome 347 intake if you have the parts to support it. You're just lacking cam and compression.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
55
Boca Raton, Florida
www.mustangworks.com
Oct 12, 2005
#6
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #6
Yes, srs flat tops, 58cc head, zero deck and no clue on head gasket thickness. Just says qty-2, 302ci, graphite.

May just port my lower and be done with it.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 12, 2005
#7
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #7
If its a .039" gasket or close to it, you're in the 10.5:1 range. My heads are 55.6cc with a zero deck block, probe srs flat tops, .039" gasket and my compression came out to 11.045:1. I remember you saying you were @ 9.5:1, I don't see how when our only difference is I have a slightly smaller chamber and i'm 11:1. I have a compression calculator I can Email you.

The ported rpm should work well. Have the upper opened for a 75mm tb too Should have gone more aggressive on the camshaft!

Then if thats not quick enough, throw on the victor with an anderson N91 cam, 4.30 gears shift @ 7,000 and rock on
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 12, 2005
#8
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #8
From our talks about what YOU want out of your car, I cant see why you would go with something other than the RPM II.

RC
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
55
Boca Raton, Florida
www.mustangworks.com
Oct 12, 2005
#9
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #9
I didn't want an aggressive cam. I still have A/C and want to drive the wife and kids around every weekend. I didn't want a car that rocks back and forth or obnoxious to be around. Going back to simplier times.

I'll call Toby at CHP and check compression again. I have the balance sheet right here but it doesn't list it. Email the compression caculator.
 

WhiteDevil

New Member
Feb 4, 2003
2,717
0
0
42
San Diego
Oct 12, 2005
#10
  • Oct 12, 2005
  • #10
VibrantRedGT said:
I didn't want an aggressive cam. I still have A/C and want to drive the wife and kids around every weekend. I didn't want a car that rocks back and forth or obnoxious to be around.
Click to expand...
Yeah i feel pretty much the same way. I think we will end up with pretty similar combos wheni do mine this summer. I will be fine with 340-350rwhp but better driveability, i mean it is my only car lol.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 13, 2005
#11
  • Oct 13, 2005
  • #11
Just give me your Email address, Joe.

I hear you on not wanting an obnoxious car. Oddly enough with my healthy cam, the car drives fine. Your cars gonna make quite abit of noise though with that 3" stuff and 3" mac mufflers
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 14, 2005
#12
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #12
Grn92LX said:
The rpm with ported lower might work good for your application as well. Though with the right cam, the rpm II will spank it from here to kingdom come
Click to expand...

Really? Here to kingdom come huh? Seen that done before? ...........I'm up for a challange.

RPMII vs ported RPM on that combo.........
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Oct 14, 2005
#13
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #13
tmoss said:
Really? Here to kingdom come huh? Seen that done before? ...........I'm up for a challange.

RPMII vs ported RPM on that combo.........
Click to expand...

Did you read ALL of what I said, Tom or no? I said with the right cam
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
55
Boca Raton, Florida
www.mustangworks.com
Oct 14, 2005
#14
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #14
I'll probably go with the RPMII.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 14, 2005
#15
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #15
Grn92LX said:
Did you read ALL of what I said, Tom or no? I said with the right cam
Click to expand...

He already has his cam - is it the right one?
 

Redsnk95

Founding Member
Feb 3, 2002
2,243
1
0
46
Houston, TX
www.stangtuning.com
Oct 14, 2005
#16
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #16
The RPM II would be my choice for you Joe. The Holley takes a ton of work for it to match up remotely close to the AFR 185 head. AFR's match up really well with the RPM line of intakes and the RPMII would be great for you.

Troy
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Oct 14, 2005
#17
  • Oct 14, 2005
  • #17
Redsnk95 said:
The Holley takes a ton of work for it to match up remotely close to the AFR 185 head.
Click to expand...

Wow, good to know. A friend of mine was going to go with that combo. The systemax is a pretty popular intake, I wonder why it doesn't match up well are the Holley heads alot different then AFR-185's?
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Oct 15, 2005
#18
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #18
zenboy99 said:
I wonder why it doesn't match up well are the Holley heads alot different then AFR-185's?
Click to expand...

The Holley intake and AFR heads do not share the same runner centerlines. It's not worth the work, just use an Eddy intake.
 

DougNuts

Founding Member
Jul 11, 2000
2,596
0
47
46
Georgetown Ky
Oct 15, 2005
#19
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #19
VibrantRedGT said:
I'll probably go with the RPMII.
Click to expand...

Good choice. I'm leaning towards the Victor on my 357, but my compression will be a little higher and I plan on reving it to about 6800.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Oct 15, 2005
#20
  • Oct 15, 2005
  • #20
What are the "right" heads to use with the Holley for a car that is mainly a street car, but with a lot of balz?

RC
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
S
Engine Stalls when downshifting/coasting
  • Scott_S
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
727
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
497
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?