• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Maybe a 331

  • Thread starter Thread starter theautomatics
  • Start date Start date Dec 20, 2007
T

theautomatics

New Member
Dec 6, 2007
37
0
0
Chicago
Dec 20, 2007
#1
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #1
Well socalcruising got me thinking now.

I'm looking for a good street ride from light to light and I want a stronger low to mid range power band. As i said before I'm rebuilding from a 289.

how hard is it to go from a 289 to a 331? Bore and stroke? Worth the money? If it's not a 331/347 then I'm just sticking with the 302. Maybe I should go the stroker route.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 20, 2007
#2
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #2
331 will need a new crank , rods and pistons. Going to a 302, may just require a crank and rods, depending on how good your bores are. Does your motor use oil ? Burn oil? run bad? How much money do you have to spend ? The 331 I have cost me about $1500 for just the short block to build.
 
T

theautomatics

New Member
Dec 6, 2007
37
0
0
Chicago
Dec 20, 2007
#3
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #3
Since pistons are around 350$ extra that sounds like a good idea. Well I'm rebuilding nearly the entire motor. It's a 289 now and has about 190hp. I cant tell if its an orginal 289 block yet. I've got about 4-5k to spend on the motor. The compression is bad now but after new canfield heads, and pistons it should be ok. I'd like 350-400 hp for street use.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Dec 20, 2007
#4
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #4
Look at the casting numbers above the starter. One group will look like this; C60E-6015-A (not necessarily those exact numbers, excepting the "6015") That will tell you if the block is a 289 block. "C6" translates to 1966--"C" is for the 60's decade, "6" is the year the model year the block was first cast. 6015 is the engineering number for an engine block. Next to these numbers, will be a number/letter/number(s) group, this is the date code, the actual date the block (or any other part) was manufactured. First number is the year, the letter is the month, starting with "A" for January thru "M" for December, skipping the letter "I". Last number or numbers is the day of the month. If this is the original block, it will have been cast up to a month before the build date of your car.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Dec 20, 2007
#5
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #5
Your 289 block will be fine for a 331. The cylinder skirts are very close to the same - to the same - as a 302 block. I have one resource that states the bores a slightly longer, but this seems to not be the case in practice, else the variation between blocks is so great that the small difference gets lost in the "mud". Anyway, stroking is okay. You can use a cast crank (like a Scat) and cheap forged rods (like Scat) and not be in it for much more than a 289 to 302. The torque difference is big with the stroker and I would recommend it for your stated needs (stop light torque, baby!). Your heads (if you already have them) are fine for under 6000RPM operation and a modest cam profile. I would upgrade to the Comp XE274HR for a roller cam. Something similar to those duration numbers if you stay flat tappet.

As for 331 pistons, Mahle (using 5.4" rod), DSS (5.315" rod), and Probe (5.4" rod) have pistons that do not have the pin encroaching the oil ring and, therefore, do not require an oil land support. An oil land support, if correctly mounted, should not be a problem, but distorting the support when installing it is (loss of good oil control). For DIYS applications by amateurs (like me), I recommend one of the above pistons just to keep down the risk of a mistake. I used the Mahle Power Pack (pistons, pins, rings, locks) and am happy with them.
 

coolblue65

Founding Member
Jul 26, 1999
1,224
2
39
Algonquin, IL
Dec 20, 2007
#6
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #6
Do the 331 or 347 for $4-5k you can build a nice strong reliable engine.

You may want to consider ditching the 289 block and using a late model 5.0 roller block to build a stroker.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Dec 20, 2007
#7
  • Dec 20, 2007
  • #7
use your 289 block and get a balanced rotating assembly from some place like DSS. that way you ge tthe complete kit of crank, rods, and pistons, as perhaps rings and bearings as well, as a matched set ready to go into your block. have the block checked over for any machine work that it will need BEFORE you order the kit. as for the cam and heads, socalcruising has the right idea.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
552
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 1994 Cobra Supercharger install
  • from6to8
  • Sep 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 20 21 22
Replies
420
Views
8K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
1970 Boss block
  • Sparky714
  • Dec 6, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
617
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 7, 2024
FastDriver
Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?