• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Measuring For Pushrods...mid-lift Method Or Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 85_SS_302_Coupe
  • Start date Start date Feb 27, 2018

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 27, 2018
#1
  • Feb 27, 2018
  • #1
Man, just when I thought I had a basic understanding of what I'm doing, I stumbled across this mid-lift thing. I've only done stud mount rockers once and that was back in 2009 when I first built this stroker, so my memory is already muddy at best. I have myself some ghetto solid lifters and an adjustable pushrod (that I'm probably going to break because I don't have the light pressure valve springs). I get the basic idea behind adjusting the pushrod and using a marker on the valve stem and such, but what about this mid-lift method? Anyone wanna throw in their two cents? I'm not looking to break any dyno records here, I just want the safest and most reliable method to measure for pushrods.
 

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,050
653
164
SE Michigan
Feb 27, 2018
#2
  • Feb 27, 2018
  • #2
You can use any method you want. What I do is keep adjusting the push rod in .050 increments until that gives maximum lift at the valve. I have the dial indicator on the valve. Before I start I have already checked what the lift was at the lifter. So with that number and the rocker ratio you can calculate the theoretrical lift at the valve. I have a Proform valve checker kit that makes this really easy that I bought years ago. Once you are finished check your scrub at the valve and adjust as necessary. It's all about kintimatics.

Without getting to deep mid lift does can get you there. I have found it to be ineffective on high lift big spring pressure as you end up with poor geometry at 0 and max lift and ideal at mid lift. What this causes at high lift is push rod deflection/adjuster or rocker failure on the push rod end.
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Feb 27, 2018
#3
  • Feb 27, 2018
  • #3
I used this method for my most recent build, worked out great.
In the video they used lightweight check springs but I did not and was able
to get correct results.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5is9BsH5OU
 
Reactions: rgsauger and 85_SS_302_Coupe

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 27, 2018
#4
  • Feb 27, 2018
  • #4
Steel1 said:
I used this method for my most recent build, worked out great.
In the video they used lightweight check springs but I did not and was able
to get correct results.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5is9BsH5OU
Click to expand...


Man that is the most clear explanation I've seen for any method of measuring. He didn't mention anything about accounting for valve lash though, should I worry about that? Gasket thickness is accounted for since the head is torqued down, right?
 
Reactions: rgsauger

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Feb 28, 2018
#5
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #5
Gasket thickness would be accounted for if head is torqued. I used this method when assembling my
engine on the stand and just snugged the heads. I also did it with engine installed and heads torqued
when I changed rockers, worked well in both applications.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 28, 2018
#6
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #6
Steel1 said:
Gasket thickness would be accounted for if head is torqued. I used this method when assembling my
engine on the stand and just snugged the heads. I also did it with engine installed and heads torqued
when I changed rockers, worked well in both applications.
Click to expand...


Did you follow up with doing the marker marks on the valve stem afterwards?
 

Steel1

Mustang Master
Aug 18, 2017
1,419
639
143
Connecticut
Feb 28, 2018
#7
  • Feb 28, 2018
  • #7
I checked one for reference and it looked good so I proceeded with the rest,
When I changed rockers used the same method and didn't bother with the marker check.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
532
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
Engine Finishing up 331 build
  • RedFury5.0
  • Mar 21, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
592
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 20, 2025
RedFury5.0
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
791
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
SOLD SOLD!!!! 1993 Notchback Roadracer For Sale. She's a beast!
  • Boydster
  • Apr 25, 2025
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
0
Views
1K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Apr 25, 2025
Boydster
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?