• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Might get a 86 GT...Difference in engine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter narib2008
  • Start date Start date Feb 19, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
N

narib2008

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
14
0
1
Feb 19, 2008
#1
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #1
Hello,
I was just wondering what the 86 gt would take to stay up with the 87 gt.I heard the engines are similar...heads are different and the plenum and tb?But im not sure?The reason im looking at the 86 gt is because its all original and has 54k miles on it.The price seams reasonable as well at 3500.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Feb 19, 2008
#2
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #2
You've pretty much nailed the essential points, already. Heads, cam, and intake plenum, basically.

That is an AWESOME price on an '86 GT with mileage that low. GET IT!
 
V

venom97

Member
Apr 29, 2003
258
8
18
Illinois
Feb 19, 2008
#3
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #3
i know the 86s have flat top pistons and "turbo swirl heads" which is why their rated lower than the 87 up. my 86 must have been built on a good day,it ran with the 87 ups. it dynoed at 202hp and 283ft/lbs of torque at the wheels. it had equel length headers,x pipe, pullies and a k&n other wise stock.
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Feb 19, 2008
#4
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #4
Ah. I forgot about the pistons.
 
N

narib2008

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
14
0
1
Feb 19, 2008
#5
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #5
Darkwriter77 said:
Ah. I forgot about the pistons.
Click to expand...

So essentially if i were to do H/C/I on a 5.0 as long as its efi it does not need to be a 87 up? Are the pistons on the 86 ok for H/C/I?
 
V

venom97

Member
Apr 29, 2003
258
8
18
Illinois
Feb 19, 2008
#6
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #6
you have to check piston to valve clearance to be sure but i dont think you run much bigger of a cam with out getting into the pistons. heads and intake will work but you might want to convert to mass air.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Feb 19, 2008
#7
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #7
This might burn some people up but IMO it's the worst of the roller 302s.
 
N

narib2008

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
14
0
1
Feb 19, 2008
#8
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #8
85_SS_302_Coupe said:
This might burn some people up but IMO it's the worst of the roller 302s.
Click to expand...

I understand however 3500 for a near mint all orignal 5.0 with 54k miles?Heres pics
 

Attachments

  • mustang 1.webp
    21.9 KB · Views: 155
  • mustang 2.webp
    18.6 KB · Views: 142
N

narib2008

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
14
0
1
Feb 19, 2008
#9
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #9
Two more pics
 

Attachments

  • mustang 3.webp
    32.2 KB · Views: 172
  • mustang 4.webp
    43.2 KB · Views: 171

ryan218

In just 10 years, I'll be old enough to drive!!!!
Dec 28, 2005
0
1
38
columbus ohio
Feb 19, 2008
#10
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #10
our 230k 86 gt is cleaner then that under the hood...and the fan cover looks to have markings from a junkyard...id check and make sure it wasn't in an accident recently.( car fax craw under it ) exterior looks very nice as well as the interior...imo its worth that even if it was in an accident
 
D

Dennis86GT

Banned
Dec 19, 2007
2
0
0
Feb 19, 2008
#11
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #11
Are you sure that the mileage isn't 154k? Look at how crumy the motor is. There is a leak everywhere as well! That could be a 154k car with a new paint job bud. I just don't want you to buy it thinking its 54k original miles. Are they documented miles? I would def check car fax. It does look nice though. If your buying a Fox for the motor buy a '89-92 5.0. '86 is not the best 5.0 motor, actually worst in my book.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Feb 19, 2008
#12
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #12
ryan218 said:
our 230k 86 gt is cleaner then that under the hood...and the fan cover looks to have markings from a junkyard...id check and make sure it wasn't in an accident recently.( car fax craw under it ) exterior looks very nice as well as the interior...imo its worth that even if it was in an accident
Click to expand...

Dont flatter yourself
To swap the heads to anything other than e7s you need to get the pistons fly cut or run a weak ass cam.
 

RsStanG1987

I shaved all my pubes playing this game.
10 Year Member
Mar 13, 2004
569
9
79
Dupont PA
Feb 19, 2008
#13
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #13
Honestly that motor looks exactly how it should for a 22 yr old car that has propbabbly never had the engine cleaned. We have cars come into the dealership where i work w/ 400 miles on them and they look like ass. We have an 05 mustang Gt w/530 miles on it and the engine is filthy. Hell my engine bay is dirty and i never even drove my car yet. Hell you can tell just from the interior alone the car has lower miles. The seats arent twisted, The door panel isnt wavy around the edges, the consel isnt ripped on the pad, The seat belt still stands straight, the carpet is really clean as are the seats.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Feb 19, 2008
#14
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #14
I'd say jump on it. While the motor does kind of suck, it actually has a broad torque curve and was magazine tested to be the fastest 0-60 car of the speed-density Foxes. the TB is smaller, the intake is smaller, the heads flow poorly, but the compression ratio is higher than the other cars because of the flattop pistons, so thats why it feels good on the street. But everything else aside, its a clean 4-eye with most of the stuff you need to go EFI already in place, so just pull a junk 87+ motor, do what you want to it and plug it in.
 
N

narib2008

New Member
Feb 19, 2008
14
0
1
Feb 20, 2008
#15
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #15
Yes the owner has documents proving 54k miles.He even has copy's of all the previous titles.He is the 3rd owner.The car has been painted so an accident is probable.It was done at the ford dealership and he said its a perfect job.The car overall sounds pretty clean.He said theres some surface rust on the drivers bottom door.I would take care of the immediatly if i was going to buy it.Honestly i would probably rather have an 87+.However they seem very hard to find for a reasonable price.
 

Flavadave4

Active Member
Nov 28, 2003
1,044
21
49
Utica, NY
Feb 20, 2008
#16
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #16
Give me his phone number so i can buy it...
Dont listen to Ryan about the junkyard fan shroud either, if he could read he would realize that they marked what temp the water was mixed to, and what date they did it.
 

Nova

New Member
Aug 10, 2006
128
0
0
Feb 20, 2008
#17
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #17
dont forget you would have to do a maf conversion bease speed density doesnt do well with upgrades, granted you can find someone to tune your car as a speed density...
 
R

Rdrcr

Member
Jul 7, 2007
77
1
9
Thousand Oaks, CA.
Feb 20, 2008
#18
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #18
I too would buy it for $3.5K, nice find and very clean (with the exception of the engine compartment). My completely stock '86 5-spd. with 100K miles ran 15.4 @ 90 in the 1/4 mile. I'm not sure how that compares with the '87, but if memory serves me correctly, it's pretty close in performance.

Mike
 

Darkwriter77

Resident Ranting Negative Nancy
5 Year Member
Jul 1, 2005
314
281
134
Apache Junction, AZ
Feb 20, 2008
#19
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #19
RsStanG1987 said:
Dont flatter yourself
To swap the heads to anything other than e7s you need to get the pistons fly cut or run a weak ass cam.
Click to expand...

Not true. You can throw E7's and an 87-93 HO cam on a low-po shortblock with flattop pistons and still be safe. Guys with Crown Vics, Grand Marquis, and Town Cars have been doing it for years without any problem. Although, yes, the clearances are tight and the compression ratio is a bit different, it's still easily do-able and doesn't require any modification, as long as you're running a stock '86 to '93 cam. If you go poking an E303 or something else like that in there, though, all bets are off...



Nova said:
dont forget you would have to do a maf conversion bease speed density doesnt do well with upgrades, granted you can find someone to tune your car as a speed density...
Click to expand...

If he's just upgrading to stock '87-'88 stuff, he won't NEED to convert to mass air. You can go as far as adding a full exhaust and CAI to the setup and still not cause any problems with the speed density system. It's when you go throwing on things that allow for a much higher demand for fuel than the air/fuel mix table in the ECM can account for that you need to upgrade to MAF (such as aftermarket heads/cam/intake, injectors, and so on).
 
D

Dennis86GT

Banned
Dec 19, 2007
2
0
0
Feb 20, 2008
#20
  • Feb 20, 2008
  • #20
narib2008 said:
Honestly i would probably rather have an 87+.However they seem very hard to find for a reasonable price.
Click to expand...

You said it yourself... Sure that '86 isn't a bad car but its not the car you want. I would not buy it in your case. You'll have to do a MAF conversion which is well over $500.00 i believe. You won't be able to run a good heads/cam setup becasue of the pistons. And i don't think you like the look of the '86s more then the '87+. Just wait for the one you want man. TRUST ME. Don't just buy a car because its a deal or nice. I made that mistake the first time. Everytime i saw the Mustang i wanted originally i just didn't want the Mustang i got a deal on. Sure i saved some money and got a nice car but it wasn't the one i wanted. I regreted buying that car for about 2 years. Then i bought the car i've always wanted. So now i dont' care much. But before i just bitched about it ha. Just tryin to help yah out man.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
858
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
Progress Thread Evolution of the 'Hudson Heap' plans (87 GT)
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Jan 5, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
29
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 26, 2024
Noobz347
For Sale 3-owner 1987 Mustang GT, $18K obro, Lancaster CA
  • Bill Cool
  • Oct 6, 2024
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
Replies
4
Views
2K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Oct 13, 2024
nickyb
M
03 GT Misfire at idle only, calling all experts!
  • midnight03
  • Feb 27, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
878
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2024
midnight03
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?