• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Might have found EFI fuel tank solution... from strange source

  • Thread starter Thread starter Swede958
  • Start date Start date Feb 26, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 26, 2006
#1
  • Feb 26, 2006
  • #1
So saturday night was an amazing boring night at 'teh Zone, so I started browsing through our catalogues that we got laying around in the back. I come upon our oil pan/gastank/fuel sending vendor. Start leafing through.
I found pictures in the back of the fuel tanks and they had sizes listed as well. Long story short, I found a tank that I think can be modded into our cars and have EFI.... and it's out of an E-150 van

Now I haven't completely studied the catalog, but here's what I got so far:

70 Stang tank: 32 5/8"L x 24.5"W x 9.75"D

88-91 E-150 : 33.5:L x 23.5"W x 11 1/8"D
(Behind Rear Axle)

Now... I know it's a lot deeper, but it looks like there's more of the tank above the belt line than the older tank since the sending unit mount above said belt line. If it's not too much, a simple false floor should be able to cover it and give a small area between the tank, floor and rise for the axle that would be perfect for running a bit of fuel line from the sender. Oh yeah, top mounted sender so you don't ahve to pull tank to change fuel pump. And the size is a bit off, but .75" in length and an inch in width seem to be well within the modification range of most of us.... at least as far as not being too much of a hassle.

The bad... there are three holes to be brazed/welded/closed up. Inlet lines on the driver side (fill/vent) and what I can only guess was a vent line on the top. As far as I know brazing some peices into these holes should be fine without damaging the galvanizing. Then's it's just a matter of brazing in a point for the filler neck to tie into with the rubber coupler or brazing the filler neck directly onto it.

And, with the fuel pump book I borrowed too... it looks like the 5.0 mustang pump will fit into the stock van sending unit....

So what do y'all think?
 

Attachments

  • 70tank.webp
    8.6 KB · Views: 157
  • vantank.webp
    9.4 KB · Views: 152

68rustang

Active Member
Jan 17, 2003
1,537
0
36
Cleveland, OH
Feb 27, 2006
#2
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #2
How much does the van tank cost?
 

monk302

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2001
742
2
16
New Jersey
Feb 27, 2006
#3
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #3
What are the dimensions for a 1968? Same?
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 27, 2006
#4
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #4
Yes, as far as my catalog is concerned the dimensions (L x W) are the same. When I ran it through the computer, I think it cost about 170$ for a new tank. That was through our vendor though, another vendor or another source may be cheaper.
 

Tubo(2-bo)

Member
Mar 25, 2004
279
0
16
Ft Walton Beach FL.
Feb 27, 2006
#5
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #5
So This has the baffles built into it?? Yep interesting find.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Feb 27, 2006
#6
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #6
Quote by Swede:
When I ran it through the computer, I think it cost about 170$ for a new tank. That was through our vendor though, another vendor or another source may be cheaper.
Click to expand...

Checker/Kragen/Schucks (PartsAmerica.com) lists it for $125.99

http://www.partsamerica.com/ProductDetail.aspx?mfrcode=SPC&mfrpartnumber=F15D&parttype=1296&ptset=A



Good info though!

Might be worth the mods to the trunk area. You wouldn't have to worry about hooking up an external pump, a surge tank, tapping into the old tank for a return... ect, ect.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Feb 27, 2006
#7
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #7
Just found a link to a tank place.

Lots of good info:

http://www.tanks-to-pans.com/site/823208/product/F-F15D
 

monk302

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2001
742
2
16
New Jersey
Feb 27, 2006
#8
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #8
Hmmmm. I am doing the EFI swap as we speak. Let me see if my local parts store can get one in for me to try one out. So let me get this right. The fuel pump is an internally mounted right where that hole is right? Where does the filler neck attach to?
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Feb 27, 2006
#9
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #9
posted by Monk302:
Hmmmm. I am doing the EFI swap as we speak. Let me see if my local parts store can get one in for me to try one out. So let me get this right. The fuel pump is an internally mounted right where that hole is right? Where does the filler neck attach to?
Click to expand...

mmm .... good question.

There's no doubt there will be some fabrication involved. Give 'em a call!
here's info from their site:

From Classic Cars to the newest models of cars and light trucks, we carry it all. If you don't find the fuel tank you are looking for give us a call at 1-800-511-4971 and we will do our best to help you find what you are looking for. New models are being added as they become available.
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 27, 2006
#10
  • Feb 27, 2006
  • #10
Yes, as far as I know just about all EFI tanks had some sort of baffling in them from the OEM.... and the replacement tanks should have the same baffling.

The filler pipe will have to welded/brazed/bolted/screwed/etc. into place and the other holes will have to be closed off. As far as I can tell, the pip should go in either right in the middle of, or towards the top of the diagonal slant on the side opposite of the sending unit mount. And yes, the fuel pump will sit in a sending unit which will be lock-ringed into the large hold.
 
S

samwe

Founding Member
Jun 18, 1999
985
0
16
Eagle River, Ak, USA
Feb 28, 2006
#11
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #11
I think that is a great find...
When I resume work on mine I think will make an attempt at getting that tank in there.
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Feb 28, 2006
#12
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #12
Gentlemen, a different tank isn't needed, you can get an inline high pressure pump, and add a return line to the sending unit in the stock tank.
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Feb 28, 2006
#13
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #13
Very true Worth, that is normally the cheapest and easiet solution. However, I've read and heard lots of accounts of problems in corners with less than 1/4 tank. Now there are adaptors (I think holley makes one) that spreads out like 3 pick up points into the tank of the sending unit. But personally I like the idea of having everything basically self contained within the tank... that's just my .02
 

WORTH

20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 18, 2002
2,166
44
98
Cape Cod, Ma.
Feb 28, 2006
#14
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #14
Swede958 said:
Very true Worth, that is normally the cheapest and easiet solution. However, I've read and heard lots of accounts of problems in corners with less than 1/4 tank. Now there are adaptors (I think holley makes one) that spreads out like 3 pick up points into the tank of the sending unit. But personally I like the idea of having everything basically self contained within the tank... that's just my .02
Click to expand...

Most of the factory efi tanks do have baffles to keep fuel near the pickup, but I did myown in my 90 econoline, it was propane when i bought and I had a new tank and sender from a carbed van, so I bought an inline pump from napa and put a return in the sender. I've been driving it for about 5 years now and haven't had a problem. Ofcourse I don't drive the van as hard as I do the stangs, so not sure if you'd have a problem with pedal to the metal turns. In normal driving the pump is supplying about 3 times the fuel the engine needs so a slight miss in the delivery shouldn't effect the engine.
Tough call.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Feb 28, 2006
#15
  • Feb 28, 2006
  • #15
I'm pretty sure the older econoline vans had an external fuel pump. Just because it's factory EFI doesn't mean the pump is in the tank.

I guess this all depends on the amount of work involved. To me it seems like a surge tank would be a much easier install and you wouldn't have to modify your trunk floor at all...
 

Swede958

Founding Member
Dec 17, 2001
712
0
0
Austin, TX
Mar 1, 2006
#16
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #16
before '88, the econos had the two pump system. low pressure in the tank ( leading me to believe that it would have no/less baffling for the low pressure) and a high pressure pump on a rail. from 88 to 91 they had an integral high pressure pump in the tank to feed the 5.0 and 5.8
 

Rusty67

20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 3, 2002
3,749
37
109
LA, CA
Mar 1, 2006
#17
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #17
The main reason I see for an in tank pump is reliability. The gas in the tank keeps the fuel pump cool. People who complain about their electric pumps dying every 2 years and them being noisy to boot could eliminate these problems by having a fuel pump mounted in the gas tank. More reliable and much quieter ? Sounds like a win/win situation to me.
 

Tim65GT

Active Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,149
2
39
West Texas
Mar 1, 2006
#18
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #18
Posted by Rusty67:
The main reason I see for an in tank pump is reliability. The gas in the tank keeps the fuel pump cool. People who complain about their electric pumps dying every 2 years and them being noisy to boot could eliminate these problems by having a fuel pump mounted in the gas tank. More reliable and much quieter ? Sounds like a win/win situation to me.
Click to expand...

So when ya gonna do it and let us all know how it goes?
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Mar 1, 2006
#19
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #19
Rusty67 said:
The main reason I see for an in tank pump is reliability. The gas in the tank keeps the fuel pump cool. People who complain about their electric pumps dying every 2 years and them being noisy to boot could eliminate these problems by having a fuel pump mounted in the gas tank. More reliable and much quieter ? Sounds like a win/win situation to me.
Click to expand...


The fuel flowing through the pump is plenty to cool it. Don't forget that at below 1/4 tank the pump is no-longer submerged anyway....just the pickup.(although the pump will probably get "splashed" during driving anyway).

But I do agree with the noise comment... it's quieter inside a tank.

The reason they put the pumps in the tank is because high pressure pumps don't like to "suck" fuel...only push. The shorter the distance the fuel has to travel before reaching the pump the better.
 
M

mtbdoc

New Member
Nov 2, 2003
245
1
0
Mar 1, 2006
#20
  • Mar 1, 2006
  • #20
I am installing a fuel cell in the 'vert, and will need a good bit of pump as the car is blown. In tank works well, and even swapping to a bigger pump isn't that tough. Given what I'm doing, we are going to try to work with a surge tank and go from there. What a pain! Carbs sure are a LOT easier to deal with...sigh!

BTW, why in the world is a drop-in Fuel Safe so darned expensive? With my rear frame mods, we were forced to buy a $200 fuel cell from Jegs!!!
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
219
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
H
Fuel starvation issues, 91 EFI to carb swap. Car dying after 1-3 gallons used. EFI tank, electric fuel pump, bypass regulator. Dual fed carb
  • hassler
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
733
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 12, 2025
nickyb
finding wiring from PCM to fuel tank pressure sensor
  • Roont
  • Oct 19, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
202
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Roont
Electrical How to test a fuel tank sending unit
  • limp
  • Apr 3, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
6K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 15, 2024
limp
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
554
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?