• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Might Need New Rear Lower Control Arms: Which

  • Thread starter Thread starter from6to8
  • Start date Start date Aug 12, 2014
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 14, 2014
#21
  • Aug 14, 2014
  • #21
Here's the thing. On ,most street driven cars you don't need anything more than stock uppers. That is why MM doesn't sell them. Factor in the cost of buying cheaper lower and uppers from another company and you are at the same price point as the MM ones. For the uppers, just replace the stock rubber bushings with 94-95 or cobra spec rubber bushings.
 
Reactions: A5literMan

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Aug 14, 2014
#22
  • Aug 14, 2014
  • #22
the real reason mm doesn't sell uppers is because they sell torque arms instead. theyre mostly focused on road racing, where the three-link works better. this is about the only thing where, if youre building a pure strip car, you just really cant go full mm.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 14, 2014
#23
  • Aug 14, 2014
  • #23
Chuckman said:
the real reason mm doesn't sell uppers is because they sell torque arms instead. theyre mostly focused on road racing, where the three-link works better. this is about the only thing where, if youre building a pure strip car, you just really cant go full mm.
Click to expand...

I disagree. I've talked to Jack Hidley- go the MM's site. They don't sell the uppers because they don't think they are needed. How many upper control arms do you think they could sell if they wanted to? Tons. Ask him yourself. He's on the Corral all the time. I've gone deep in the 10's with their lowers and Ford factory uppers. Never had a problem. I'm sure if you drag race all the time and/or do this for a living, you want to dial in the car for a pure drag car, then yes adjustable uppers are the way to go.

However, the OP is not building a drag car so the point is moot. For his application, he doesn''t need aftermarket uppers. Would you agree?
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Aug 15, 2014
#24
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #24
mikestang63 said:
Here's the thing. On ,most street driven cars you don't need anything more than stock uppers. That is why MM doesn't sell them. Factor in the cost of buying cheaper lower and uppers from another company and you are at the same price point as the MM ones. For the uppers, just replace the stock rubber bushings with 94-95 or cobra spec rubber bushings.
Click to expand...
i have a set of new stock uppers and new stock bushings that I have had for yrs and my thinking back then must have been to change em out and use those. I am taking the car this morning to get it diagnosed as to what exactly is wrong though. I like what I read from the JnM's one poster provided on page 1 and will read up on the UPR's and BBks. I have saved in my notes some others as well so i will see which ones I think will be better overall being the car won't see the track until maybe another motor and at that time it might be just to time it but I highly doubt it. I really don't care much about all the track stuff, I just want it nice on the streets
Here is the part number of just the new bushing:
1R3Z-5A638-BA
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Aug 15, 2014
#25
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #25
mikestang63 said:
However, the OP is not building a drag car so the point is moot. For his application, he doesn''t need aftermarket uppers. Would you agree?
Click to expand...
Totally agree with this last part, replace the bushings if theyre torn up, but stock will be fine.
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Aug 15, 2014
#26
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #26
mikestang63 said:
I disagree. I've talked to Jack Hidley- go the MM's site. They don't sell the uppers because they don't think they are needed. How many upper control arms do you think they could sell if they wanted to? Tons. Ask him yourself. He's on the Corral all the time. I've gone deep in the 10's with their lowers and Ford factory uppers. Never had a problem. I'm sure if you drag race all the time and/or do this for a living, you want to dial in the car for a pure drag car, then yes adjustable uppers are the way to go.

However, the OP is not building a drag car so the point is moot. For his application, he doesn''t need aftermarket uppers. Would you agree?
Click to expand...
This is for everyone and an update on rear suspension check. It really wasnt anything noticable to me and the guy at precision tune who checked the car even though I could tell he wasnt that knowledgeable on the matter. Somewhat but not an expert. At least I could get the car up in the air and take pics which I will post below.

Here is the main issue I am having. When I go over certain low spots in roads and even some railroad tracks at normal speed, I hear the scrape sound from rear and I'm sure the fenderwell lip is hitting the tires with the rear of car going down that far. New shocks and struts put on last year, new isolators, struts, and all front end work. Tires are 295 35 18's in rear on 18x10 wheels. I did notice the way I was parked in garage for a week since drove car before today, it appeared car was leaning or squatting more in rear but it didnt look so that way today in shop so not sure if it was my garage floor or what. Not exactly sure but using 2 fingers check there and when got home, there is just a lil more than a hair difference using the 2 finger check method which is what can get between rear tire and fender lip. Also looking at the lowers, I wonder why the arm isnt the width of the housing? The arm is resting on the bushing though the bushing has a rubber sleeve. Also do the arm need to be more centered on the bushing?

I just hate that dawggone scraping sound when I hit those spots in road, it's irritating and appears the tires are being hit some, can actually see it. I even rolled fender lips some with a baseball bat sometime last year. I want to make sure everything in rear is up to par so here are pics below and let me know what yall think I might need to do/change.

pic 6 is in next post
 

Attachments

  • LCA BUSHINGS 2.webp
    82.4 KB · Views: 164
  • LCA BUSHINGS 3.webp
    77 KB · Views: 164
  • LCA BUSHINGS 4.webp
    73.4 KB · Views: 164
  • LCA BUSHINGS 5.webp
    59.7 KB · Views: 159
  • LCA BUSHINGS 6.webp
    53.3 KB · Views: 144

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Aug 15, 2014
#27
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #27
also another pic, compare pic 7 to one of the other 5 and you should be able to see how one is centered and the other side appears the arm is more to the end of the bushing/housing
 

Chuckman

GTFO you fat, heavy bastard
15 Year Member
Oct 21, 2005
1,604
1,002
173
st. louis, mo
Aug 15, 2014
#28
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #28
If tires are rubbing, its probably on the inside of the wheel well, about a 275 is about the widest you can really go without some kind of work with a bfh. A 295 is almost an inch wider than that.

The bushings in those arms do look pretty tired though, I would at least throw some new bushings in there, I would almost bet a call to prothane or energy with some measurements would find what you need (they probably make most of the a/m arm bushings, or at least the material for them)
 

Sharad

ALWAYS choose the V over the P!!! Wait... what?
Jan 5, 2011
1,562
480
94
Fort Myers, Florida
Aug 15, 2014
#29
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #29
Yeah, those bushings look worn out to me. There's a lot of tech that goes into the bushing design, and unfortunately, not all aftermarket arms have good quality bushings and pins.
 

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Aug 15, 2014
#30
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #30
Chuckman said:
If tires are rubbing, its probably on the inside of the wheel well, about a 275 is about the widest you can really go without some kind of work with a bfh. A 295 is almost an inch wider than that.

The bushings in those arms do look pretty tired though, I would at least throw some new bushings in there, I would almost bet a call to prothane or energy with some measurements would find what you need (they probably make most of the a/m arm bushings, or at least the material for them)
Click to expand...
when i bought those arms at first, the ones that came in the Mac arms actually crumbled up. How do you know when Polys are worn? Mine are actually energy suspensions the bushings that we swapped out before
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Aug 15, 2014
#31
  • Aug 15, 2014
  • #31
Just switched from Steeda upper and lowers to UPR. No reason other than wanting to go faster, given UPR has proven the suspension wins.

All say this, both were great control arms hands down. I wouldn't hesitate to put either on my car. The fit and finish are great on both pair. The UPR's were lighter.

However, I sixty footed better on the UPR suspension first pass off the trailer with no other changes than a blown head gasket, I was fighting cooling issues only to find a blown head gasket.
 
Reactions: Sharad

from6to8

There's suction so I used that end O_O
15 Year Member
Sep 2, 2012
1,896
142
94
Aug 29, 2014
#32
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • #32
7upstang91 said:
Just switched from Steeda upper and lowers to UPR. No reason other than wanting to go faster, given UPR has proven the suspension wins.

All say this, both were great control arms hands down. I wouldn't hesitate to put either on my car. The fit and finish are great on both pair. The UPR's were lighter.

However, I sixty footed better on the UPR suspension first pass off the trailer with no other changes than a blown head gasket, I was fighting cooling issues only to find a blown head gasket.
Click to expand...
Also, when I did the engine swap back in 02, the rear end came out of a 96-98 convertible GT. I noticed on for instance Trick vert's car and even my boy's car, which I had forgot to inquire about, there are quad shocks on the rear right? Is that something that I need to get and put on the car? Advantages and disadvantages of having them on/not on?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 29, 2014
#33
  • Aug 29, 2014
  • #33
If you go with aftermarket control arms you might not need the quad shocks. If you do still get wheel hop, put them back them on.
 

7upstang91

10 Year Member
May 30, 2008
936
124
74
Florida
Aug 30, 2014
#34
  • Aug 30, 2014
  • #34
I do not run quad shocks. Zero hop at all. You should be fine.
 
Reactions: Sharad

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 30, 2014
#35
  • Aug 30, 2014
  • #35
If you do need to put them on, you can reverse them for more tire clearance.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
250
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
332
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
295
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Considering widening my rear wheels, would like to verify my thoughts on fitment
  • 2000xp8
  • Jul 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
393
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 15, 2026
FastDriver
Suspension Rear pinion angle
  • JD1964
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
987
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 5, 2025
JD1964
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?