• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Mind made up...Supra

  • Thread starter Thread starter blackonblack06
  • Start date Start date Dec 26, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

blackonblack06

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
108
0
0
San Antonio, TEXAS
Dec 26, 2006
#1
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #1
Well, I am going to have the strangest inventory of cars. I have decided to get a TT Supra. Bang for buck...extremely competitive. Horsepower...wicked 900rwhp
I Been looking around a lot and the prices are reasonable, HP is crazy...and best of all will still have my Stang. The power and look of the Supra's is unbelievable and the prices I have seen, a sub-10 second car will not be unreachable with my budget.
I am not, and will not get rid of the Stang. One thing I am afraid of is the reliability of a Supra. But most research to date indicates an excellent reliablity rating for a sports supercar, and good gas mileagle to boot.
Is this considered a "going to the dark side" moment?
 

A&B 06GT

New Member
Jul 11, 2006
54
0
0
BAY AREA
Dec 26, 2006
#2
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #2
you can have a very reliable supra and they do make great HP unlike our mustang motor a stock supra motor can handle crazy boost! do the single turbo upgrade!
 

blackonblack06

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
108
0
0
San Antonio, TEXAS
Dec 26, 2006
#3
  • Dec 26, 2006
  • #3
What trips me out the most is that for 30g's I can grab a 7-900rwhp Supra. At least that is what my research on a budget race car is telling me. I want to some day run a sub10 car. A Supra will do it and it will be street legal to boot. I guess I am hooked on speed but don't have the money to get my or any other stang to that high of HP, with reliability hangin' in the balance.
Any other supercar with that high of hp will cost in the upper 90-100k range. Why are the Supra's so comparitively cheap? More research is due...
 

Mr_Q

Founding Member
Nov 5, 2002
721
8
48
Burbank, CA
Dec 27, 2006
#4
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #4
Supra is one of the few cars you can brag about not only on here but any Mustang forum and not get flamed. They eff'n rock the block...literally.
 

65fastback2+2

New Member
Aug 4, 2003
1,229
0
0
Louisville, KY
Dec 27, 2006
#5
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #5
you can put 30k into your stang and it would be just as fast if not faster and reliable....guy on the mach1 forums has a 1000rwhp mach thats completely reliable....supras are pretty bad at getting traction (usually)
 
T

thomas91169

I'd donkey punch my sister.
Aug 19, 2005
0
0
0
Modesto, CA
Dec 27, 2006
#6
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #6
yeah umm, whats a 300hp and a 1000hp supra have in common? 12 seconds. They suck at launching unless you have them specifically set up to do so, and then they would be horrible at everything else but the 1/4.

If you do get a supra and do plan on making 500+hp, it WILL only be useful on the freeway, 1st, 2nd and 3rd will be useless.

you want to know the best bang for your buck car to get into 10's? 90-94 Eclipse/Talon/Laser. AWD utilizing the 4g63, probably one of the greatest 4cyl motors ever concieved by man. In a DSM, its capible of 500rwhp UNTOUCHED, 600 when you upgrade the head studs and gasket (the stock studs will allow the head to lift past 25-28psi) and the right tuning. you can get a running good condition 1g (90-94 dsm) for 1-2k and throw another 5-9k into mods (60trim turbo, fuel system, fmic, DSMlink to tune, 2.4L Stroker, Shep Tranny) and it WILL run 10's. Reliable, no, but guess what, a 900hp Supra wont be either, no matter what the supra fansite says. Many DSM guys have Supras as well, and drive their dsm's more cause the supra is down. just cause the motor alone can take the abuse, doesnt mean the rest of the car can.

btw whats your "Budget" anyways? i dont know what your smoking, but modding a supra to the 900hp level is NOT cheap, ask Hogan, he has a few. youre looking at 20k+ for mods alone, before taking into consideration dyno time, installation time if you have a shop do it, and before the price of the car (10-15k). I dont think id call thats much bang for the buck. you can have a TT Terminator for less.

Unless you want a supra cause all the hot asian chicks flock to them at HIN..........
 
U

Uncle Meat

Banned
Jun 13, 2002
0
1
0
Prattville, Alabama
Dec 27, 2006
#7
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #7
Get a DSM pushin' 500+ and then you can "Walk the Crank" too!



U.M.

 

Attachments

  • Crankwalk.webp
    28.6 KB · Views: 144

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Dec 27, 2006
#8
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #8
I am a former Supra owner, and I want to make it clear that the car is no super car. Don't even try to put it in that category. Another thing, your paying 30 grand for a used and likely abused car. Fast and the Furious ruined the care of these cars. Unless you owned it from the get go, there is no telling who did what with the car. You can bolt on a big azz turbo or some twins and tune, beat the snot out of that car for 5 years and then return it to stock and no one would be the wiser. The good news - that bottom end can handle it. The bad news, the suspension and trans take a serious beating. If your making a race car out of it, this doesn't matter, but if you are staying in a budget it definately does matter.

Fully expect to spend no less than 4K in getting the chassis dialed in for traction, but you still won't get great traction. The car is an animal properly boosted and tuned and I'll forever be a fan of these cars.

Head work for flow will break the bank too.

Mine was full on drag for 2 years, 10.17 et's on conservative tunes, would have cut easy 9 second passes pushing her, but I got the wise idea to convert to show car, and then last year sold her. Man I miss this car.

My main point is, don't think your just gonna pop sub tens without the normal headaches of spending lots of money, you will sink a ton of dough into building the Supra. Drivetrain beyond the motor is an issue, and no one accounts for what those parts cost when you make the proper upgrades for power handling. Getting the Chassis dialed in is a whole other issue.

Here's a few photos of the engine bay in mine just before World of Wheels car show here in Chicago in 2003, had to detail the engine bay for judging.





 

Attachments

  • supraturbo3po0.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 165
  • supraturbo2sq5.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 135
  • supraturboxj6.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 171
H

helmsman

New Member
Jul 9, 2006
10
0
1
Snohomish, Wa
Dec 27, 2006
#9
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #9
If owning a supra is a venture too the dark side then enjoy the ride, I have, even though mine is old school. I-6 Turbo Rocks!!!
 
H

Hoboattacker

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
542
0
0
Baton Rouge (LSU) / Houston, TX
Dec 27, 2006
#10
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #10
You can have 1200hp in a Supra and never break out of the 12's
 
H

helmsman

New Member
Jul 9, 2006
10
0
1
Snohomish, Wa
Dec 27, 2006
#11
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #11
Some of the top teams are are running sub 7 sec 1/4's. Not to shabby for a 6 banger.
 
F

FNG 2001

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2001
201
0
0
Hawthorne, CA
Dec 27, 2006
#12
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #12
I am considering buying a new one. I believe 2009 is the year they will be reintroduced. I would never spend 30k on a used Supra. I spent 11K on a 3000GT VR-4 with only 38K miles. That's one of the most underrated cars around. Dynamic racing is doing some sick stuff with those cars. That was a fun car until I got over aggressive with the suspension and went with the tein coilovers. Can you say harsh ride? Car sold, lesson learned.
 

blackonblack06

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
108
0
0
San Antonio, TEXAS
Dec 27, 2006
#13
  • Dec 27, 2006
  • #13
Well I appreciate all the input from everyone. It is such a hard decision. I want to find one with low miles that has been kept up. I know pretty much any car I choose will have a history of being beat on. But hopefully I will make the right decision.

As far as price goes, I hope to get one that has mods done already, but I want to stay cautious enough to not buy someone elses problems. Just like any car, the more you mod it the more you are throwing money away because you won't get much on the return sale. I will post my progress once I get one. My instinct is to just go get one....But I prefer to be patient and wait for the right deal.
Thanks a bunch...any more info is surely welcome.
 

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Dec 28, 2006
#14
  • Dec 28, 2006
  • #14
Get in that engine bay and do compression test, an absolute must. Start there and then work your way around to everything else. Bad results on that compression test, walk away. Test all cylinders, not just one or two.
 

Rock36

Member
Jan 1, 2006
76
0
6
Modesto, CA/Germany
Dec 28, 2006
#15
  • Dec 28, 2006
  • #15
FNG 2001 said:
I am considering buying a new one. I believe 2009 is the year they will be reintroduced. I would never spend 30k on a used Supra. I spent 11K on a 3000GT VR-4 with only 38K miles. That's one of the most underrated cars around. Dynamic racing is doing some sick stuff with those cars. That was a fun car until I got over aggressive with the suspension and went with the tein coilovers. Can you say harsh ride? Car sold, lesson learned.
Click to expand...

+1 I completely agree on the 3000GT, I don't know if they have a super bottom end like the supra, but they are pretty quick out of the box, and you can find them very cheap. I don't think they look too shabby either.

I just read in motor trend or one of those mags that the new performance car from Supra may not be a Supra at all. It is the FT-HS concept.

http://www.motortrend.com/future/concept_cars/112_0702_toyota_fths
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
Dec 29, 2006
#16
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #16
65fastback2+2 said:
you can put 30k into your stang and it would be just as fast if not faster and reliable....guy on the mach1 forums has a 1000rwhp mach thats completely reliable....supras are pretty bad at getting traction (usually)
Click to expand...


if it is a ford block not for long
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 29, 2006
#17
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #17
Hello 05+ guys..... I saw someone posted the S word and talking about how cost-effective they are.... is that right? Well right for the... (I don't want to say horse's) mouth of whatever...




Lots of money for a dyno queen / roll revenger.

Well, I don't hate Supra's, but generally that is what most of them are, and you see why, look at the prices.
 

Emay

Member
Oct 4, 2006
228
1
18
South Elgin, IL
Dec 29, 2006
#18
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #18
90 - your right, the car is not cheap to build overall when looking for the 10's. Performance parts are no different for a supra than they are for a mustang, often times they are priced slightly higher for the imports.

I think blackonblack06 is talking about out of the box performance. Which I totally agree with and know first hand. The Supra is a bad boy in stock form and with little money can be deadly as a street car.

Sub ten second passes won't come cheap. Like any other aftermarket following though, you can stay in your low cost category on a majority of the parts list via group buys, sales and what not. The good news is the thing can go well into the tens reliably on the stock block.

I personally would build a terminator instead. Probably because I did the supra thing..
 
G

govedob

New Member
Dec 19, 2006
3
0
0
Dec 29, 2006
#19
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #19
Toyota's and Honda's are the most reliable cars. The only reason for doubts would be the fact that's probably 10 or more years old vehicle since they stopped making them a while ago.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Dec 29, 2006
#20
  • Dec 29, 2006
  • #20
I don't care what make or model a car is, when you start making real power, especially when you start hooking it, things are going to break. If you just want a fast/fun car, you can do it for less, but if you want to roll with the big dogs, it's going to cost you a lot more. It is true you can make some cars pretty fast without really getting your hands dirty, that is why some types of cars attract some types of guys.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
Expired 2000 GT Track HPDE car
  • bossman429
  • Feb 23, 2013
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
1
Views
20K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Mar 13, 2013
bossman429
B
B
  • Locked
2002 Mustang GT 302 Forged Stroker, Head/Cammed, Procharged
  • BrendonDoherty
  • Jul 2, 2011
  • SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04)
Replies
2
Views
2K
SN95 Mustangs For Sale (1994-04) Jul 2, 2011
BrendonDoherty
B
P
Engine 95 Gt 5.0ho Build-up
  • psychorugby
  • Oct 19, 2011
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
38K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 20, 2016
Dirt bike kid
  • Locked
88 Mustang LX Highly Modified Street Machine
  • soontobefastfox
  • Jul 18, 2011
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
25
Views
12K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) Sep 16, 2011
LS3vette
L
8
  • Locked
FS: 1993 LX 5.0 347 stroker reef blue/black int.
  • 87nitemare
  • Mar 9, 2010
  • Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93)
  • 2
Replies
36
Views
19K
Fox Body Mustangs For Sale (1979-93) May 19, 2010
87nitemare
8
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?